With the Affordable Care Act, she can apply for insurance that will cover this. One of the anomalies of the Act is that preexisting conditions cannot be taken into account. She can take one of the better plans (higher premiums but since she knows she will be using it right away it is worth it) and have all this covered. Of course, it will be months before she can actually get online to get the actual coverage...
I agree with Mel on this one. The name calling response is just the sort of hateful divisiveness that keeps us all opposed to each other. Maybe it is time for people to mind their own business, let others be what and who they are, and do what's best for them individually. Issuing challenges to the rest of us, calling each other names and acting all (unjustifiably) superior, just gets in the way.
There is this common misconception that anything a woman does in retaliation for an action is permissible. How many times does the media portray a woman slapping, punching, kicking someone because that person said something, or as in this case did something. The correct response is not to break someone's nose, and the woman got what she deserved for her overreaction. If she had simply accused him of the assault (technically, a battery, because there was touching) then this story would have had a different outcome.