<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; wreckage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/wreckage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Titanic Expedition Was a Cover For Secret Navy Missions</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/11/28/titanic-expedition-was-a-cover-for-secret-navy-missions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/11/28/titanic-expedition-was-a-cover-for-secret-navy-missions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wreckage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2008/11/28/titanic-expedition-was-a-cover-for-secret-navy-missions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Ballard, the explorer who found the wreckage of the Titanic, has just revealed that the expedition was actually a cover story for the US Navy about two lost nuclear submarines:
The Navy was not interested in the Titanic. &#8230; I mean, they funded the technology because it had so many military applications. And I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2008-11/titanic-shipwreck.jpg" width="150" height="223" class="imageleft">Robert Ballard, the explorer who found the wreckage of the <em>Titanic</em>, has just revealed that the expedition was actually a cover story for the US Navy about two lost nuclear submarines:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Navy was not interested in the Titanic. &#8230; I mean, they funded the technology because it had so many military applications. And I was a naval intelligence officer for 30 years, and so I did a lot of missions for the Navy. Many remain classified, my best stuff. Rats &#8230;</em></p>
<p><em>Yes, the Titanic was a cover for a series of military operations. The Titanic was here, and over here was the Scorpion and over here was the Thresher (as he says this, he arranges three objects on a tabletop, roughly in a line, the center one depicting the Titanic).</em></p>
<p><em>And had that not occurred, I probably would not have found the Titanic because they wouldn&#8217;t have funded me. I mean, if the Titanic was in the Indian Ocean, it&#8217;d probably still be in the Indian Ocean. But &#8230; it was straddled by two very interesting subs that we had lost &#8212; and the Scorpion was lost on war patrol &#8230; and it was carrying nuclear weapons. So it was a very hot sub to the Navy &#8230;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/humaninterest/article914855.ece">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2008/11/28/titanic-expedition-was-a-cover-for-secret-navy-missions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-26 02:16:53 -->