<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>People Freaking Out Over The Wikipedia Blackout</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2012/01/18/people-freaking-out-over-the-wikipedia-blackout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2012/01/18/people-freaking-out-over-the-wikipedia-blackout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Harness</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=59308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, I&#8217;m sure you have all heard about SOPA and PIPA being as how every blog in the world has been talking about them as of late. Even those that are usually apolitical (like Neatorama) have taken a stand against the legislation, but despite all the talk and Wikipedia&#8217;s many messages warning about their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-59309" title="herpderpedia-20120118-013626" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/herpderpedia-20120118-013626-500x215.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="215" /></p>
<p>By now, I&#8217;m sure you have all heard about <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2012/01/18/sopa-and-pipa-the-internet-needs-your-help/">SOPA and PIPA</a> being as how every blog in the world has been talking about them as of late. Even those that are usually apolitical (like Neatorama) have taken a stand against the legislation, but despite all the talk and Wikipedia&#8217;s many messages warning about their upcoming blackout, some people still didn&#8217;t get the memo.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where Herpderpedia comes in&#8230; chronicling the Tweets of people freaking out over the Wikipedia blackout despite the many warnings on the site and the fact that its blackout message clearly describes what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>Sure the Twitter account will only have one good day, but it&#8217;s certain to bring endless enjoyment for the internet snobs around the country.</p>
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/herpderpedia">Link</a> Via <a href="http://laughingsquid.com/herpderpedia-a-collection-of-tweets-by-people-freaking-out-about-wikipedias-sopa-pipa-blackout/">Laughing Squid</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2012/01/18/people-freaking-out-over-the-wikipedia-blackout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case History Of A Wikipedia Page: Nabokov’s &#8216;Lolita&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/25/case-history-of-a-wikipedia-page-nabokov%e2%80%99s-lolita/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/25/case-history-of-a-wikipedia-page-nabokov%e2%80%99s-lolita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book & Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lolita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=51956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some websites that are so interesting and extensive they are known as &#8220;black holes&#8221; or &#8220;time sucks,&#8221; because once you get started, you may not be able to escape. Wikipedia is near the top of the list. Even more perilous to your workday than reading is joining Wikipedia as an editor. Before you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-51955" title="357px-Lolita_1955" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/357px-Lolita_1955-150x251.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="251" />There are some websites that are so interesting and extensive they are known as &#8220;black holes&#8221; or &#8220;time sucks,&#8221; because once you get started, you may not be able to escape. Wikipedia is near the top of the list. Even more perilous to your workday than reading is <em>joining</em> Wikipedia as an editor. Before you decide to take that step, you might want to learn something about the culture of Wikipedia editing. The Awl looks at the editing history of one provocative entry:</p>
<blockquote><p>Since 2001, the Wikipedia entry on Vladimir Nabokov&#8217;s Lolita has been edited 2,303 times. It&#8217;s a popular entry, too: of approximately 750,000 Wiki articles out there, it ranks at 2,075 in traffic.</p>
<p>In the past ten years, the entry has grown from the four-sentence description, shown above, to the detailed, 6,000-plus-word monolith of today. The two Lolita films now have their own pages, while the entry on the novel has expanded to include sections on such subjects as Lolita&#8217;s Russian translation and its literary allusions. An edit is made, on average, about every other day.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not only is the entry constantly edited, but those edits are discussed among editors. The road to the perfect entry is long and involved, and sometimes resembles sausage making. <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2011/08/case-history-of-a-wikipedia-page-nabokov%E2%80%99s-lolita" target="_blank">Link</a> -via <a href="http://boingboing.net/" target="_blank">Boing Boing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/25/case-history-of-a-wikipedia-page-nabokov%e2%80%99s-lolita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State of Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/01/22/the-state-of-wikipedia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/01/22/the-state-of-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=40877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(YouTube link) Co-founder Jimmy Wales explains how Wikipedia came about ten years ago, how it works, and some interesting facts you might know about the website. -via Boing Boing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="295" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gXD1TRGafQ0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="295" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gXD1TRGafQ0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
(<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXD1TRGafQ0" target="_blank">YouTube link</a>)</p>
<p>Co-founder Jimmy Wales explains how Wikipedia came about ten years ago, how it works, and some interesting facts you might know about the website. -via <a href="http://">Boing Boing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/01/22/the-state-of-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia Explains Rap Music</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/07/wikipedia-explains-rap-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/07/wikipedia-explains-rap-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren G and Nate Dogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/07/wikipedia-explains-rap-music/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with rap today is that mere mortals can't possibly understand the lyrics of the song. Thankfully, Wikipedia's WikiProject Songs comes to our rescue. Aaron Lefkove of The Awl has the scoop: Earlier this week a link to the Wikipedia synopsis of the 1994 Warren G and Nate Dogg hit &#34;Regulate,&#34; from the &#34;Above [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2010-07/regulate-rap.jpg" width="150" height="150" class="imageleft">The 
        problem with rap today is that mere mortals can't possibly understand 
        the lyrics of the song. Thankfully, Wikipedia's WikiProject Songs comes 
        to our rescue.</p>
      <p>Aaron Lefkove of <a href="http://www.theawl.com/">The Awl</a> has the 
        scoop:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p><em>Earlier this week <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulate_%28song%29#Synopsis">a 
          link to the Wikipedia synopsis of the 1994 Warren G and Nate Dogg hit 
          &quot;Regulate,&quot;</a> from the &quot;Above The Rim&quot; soundtrack, 
          bounced around the internet. The summary gives a shot-by-shot breakdown 
          of two young thugs out on an all night sex, drug, homicide and gambling 
          romp. The entry also provides a great summation of the &quot;G-Funk&quot; 
          sound, a style of music that sits comfortably at the nexus of mid-period 
          Parliament and Michael McDonald's solo 80s output, wherein rhythm, bass, 
          and treble elements are all interchangeable. The description is dry 
          and academic in tone and, the more times you read it, riddled with condescending 
          and likely ironic latent racism. Or, as one acquaintance prefaced it 
          when forwarding the link, &#8220;it&#8217;s written in language white 
          people can understand.&quot;</em></p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>For example:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p><em>On a cool, clear night (typical to Southern California) Warren 
          G travels through his neighborhood, searching for women with whom he 
          might initiate sexual intercourse. He has chosen to engage in this pursuit 
          alone.[6]</em></p>
        <p><em> Nate Dogg, having just arrived in Long Beach, seeks Warren. On 
          his way to find Warren, Nate passes a car full of women who are excited 
          to see him. Regardless, he insists to the women that there is no cause 
          for excitement.</em></p>
        <p><em>Warren makes a left turn at 21st Street and Lewis Ave, in the East 
          Hill/Salt Lake neighborhood[7], where he sees a group of young men enjoying 
          a game of dice together. He parks his car and greets them. He is excited 
          to find people to play with, but to his chagrin, he discovers they intend 
          to relieve him of his material possessions. Once the hopeful robbers 
          reveal their firearms, Warren realizes he is in a less than favorable 
          predicament.</em></p>
        <p><em>Meanwhile, Nate passes the women, as they are low on his list of 
          priorities. His primary concern is locating Warren. After curtly casting 
          away the strumpets (whose interest in Nate was such that they crashed 
          their automobile), he serendipitously stumbles upon his friend, Warren 
          G, being held up by the young miscreants.</em></p>
        <p><em>Warren, unaware that Nate is surreptitiously observing the scene 
          unfold, is in disbelief that he is being robbed. The perpetrators have 
          taken jewelry and a name brand designer watch from Warren, who is so 
          incredulous that he asks what else the robbers intend to steal. This 
          is most likely a rhetorical question. </em>(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulate_(song)#Synopsis">Source</a>)</p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>I have only one thought about the whole thing: oh, please, please, please 
        let this be a meme!</p>
      <p><a href="http://www.theawl.com/2010/08/mr-dogg-is-angry-at-the-prospect-of-sharing-his-alcoholic-beverage-the-secretive-heroes-of-wikipedia">Link</a></p>
      <p>Previously on Neatorama: <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/10/04/freestyle-rap-battle-translated-into-plain-english/">Freestyle 
        Rap Battle Translated Into Plain English</a></p>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/07/wikipedia-explains-rap-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia as a Book</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/21/wikipedia-as-a-book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/21/wikipedia-as-a-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book & Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/21/wikipedia-as-a-book/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would Wikipedia look like if it were printed out as a traditional encyclopedia? Rob Matthews decided to make it his art project: behold, the 5,000 pages of Wikipedia (featured articles only, mind you) in book form: Link - via Cliff Pickover&#8217;s Reality Carnival]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/wikipedia-book.jpg" width="500" height="497"></p>
<p>What would Wikipedia look like if it were printed out as a traditional encyclopedia? Rob Matthews decided to make it his art project: behold, the 5,000 pages of Wikipedia (featured articles only, mind you) in book form: <a href="http://www.rob-matthews.com/index.php?/project/wikipedia/">Link</a><br />
- via <a href="http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/Pickover/pc/realitycarnival.html">Cliff Pickover&#8217;s Reality Carnival</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/21/wikipedia-as-a-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Celebrity Wikipedia Entries They Clearly Wrote Themselves</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/06/five-celebrity-wikipedia-entries-they-clearly-wrote-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/06/five-celebrity-wikipedia-entries-they-clearly-wrote-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corey feldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say, Cracked.com nailed this one. I grew up loving Corey Feldman. My cousins and I used to fight over who would get to marry him someday (thank God I lost that one, I guess). But even I have to admit his career is less than stellar at the moment. However, the &#8220;anonymous&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/stacy/corey.jpg" class="imageleft" width="150">I have to say, Cracked.com nailed this one. I grew up loving Corey Feldman.  My cousins and I used to fight over who would get to marry him someday (thank God I lost that one, I guess).  But even I have to admit his career is less than stellar at the moment.  However, the &#8220;anonymous&#8221; person who wrote this section of his Wikipedia entry begs to differ:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;In November of 2008 he released his most ambitious musical project to date, a new album with his band Truth Movement entitled Technology Analogy. This high concept album has been met with tremendous reviews, and features an all-star line up, including Jon Carin (Pink Floyd), Mark Karan (Rat Dog, Grateful Dead) Scotty Page (Pink Floyd), and artwork by the legendary artist Storm Thorgerson. To order his album check out his website at www.coreyfeldman.net&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Aw&#8230; yeah.  Cracked has also outed Bruce Willis, Hulk Hogan, Paul Stanley and William Shatner as the authors of their own Wikipedia entries.  And maybe the entries were written by lackeys or overzealous fans, but the article is funny either way.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_16939_5-celebrity-wikipedia-entries-they-clearly-wrote-themselves.html">Link </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/06/five-celebrity-wikipedia-entries-they-clearly-wrote-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2% Wikipediaholics Account for 73.4% of All Wikipedia Edits</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/04/2-wikipediaholics-account-for-734-of-all-wikipedia-edits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/04/2-wikipediaholics-account-for-734-of-all-wikipedia-edits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 06:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimbo Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/04/2-wikipediaholics-account-for-734-of-all-wikipedia-edits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia bills itself as the free online encyclopedia anyone can edit. And while indeed that is true, do you ever wonder who does the bulk of the work? Jimbo Wales, the founder of Wikipedia has the surprising answer: Wales decided to run a simple study to find out: he counted who made the most edits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-01/wikipedia.jpg" width="150" height="186" class="imageleft">Wikipedia bills itself as the free online encyclopedia anyone can edit. And while indeed that is true, do you ever wonder who does the bulk of the work? Jimbo Wales, the founder of Wikipedia has the surprising answer:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Wales decided to run a simple study to find out: he counted who made the most edits to the site. &quot;I expected to find something like an 80-20 rule: 80% of the work being done by 20% of the users, just because that seems to come up a lot. But it&#8217;s actually much, much tighter than that: it turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users &#8230; 524 people. &#8230; And in fact the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits.&quot; The remaining 25% of edits, he said, were from &quot;people who [are] contributing &#8230; a minor change of a fact or a minor spelling fix &#8230; or something like that.&quot;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Aaron Swartz of Raw Thought has the full story: <a href="http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia">Link</a> &#8211; via <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/who-the-hell-writes-wikipedia-anyway">Silicon Alley Insider</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/04/2-wikipediaholics-account-for-734-of-all-wikipedia-edits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:01:12 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.2709 seconds -->
