<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; Space Race</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/space-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Secret Race to the Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/18/the-secret-race-to-the-moon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/18/the-secret-race-to-the-moon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bathroom Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=49458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is reprinted from the book Uncle John&#8217;s Unsinkable Bathroom Reader. For nearly twenty years after Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon in July 1969, the Soviet Union categorically denied having a manned lunar program of its own. It wasn&#8217;t until the late 1980s that we began to learn just how close they came [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-49467" title="250_sovietposter" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/250_sovietposter.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="380" />The following is reprinted from the book <em><a href="https://bathroomreader.theretailerplace.com/MLBX/actions/searchHandler.do?key=0007844209&amp;nextPage=booksDetails&amp;parentNum=11997" target="_blank">Uncle John&#8217;s Unsinkable Bathroom Reader.</a></em></p>
<p><em>For nearly twenty years after Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon in July 1969, the Soviet Union categorically denied having a manned lunar program of its own. It wasn&#8217;t until the late 1980s that we began to learn just how close they came to beating the United States to the moon.</em></p>
<p><strong>HEARING IS BELIEVING</strong></p>
<p>Not too long after 9:00 PM on the evening of April 11, 1961, a United States government listening post off Alaska picked up the sound of human voices speaking in Russian. That wasn&#8217;t unusual; in the early 1960s, the Cold War was at its height, and the listening post had been set up for the purpose of intercepting Soviet communications.</p>
<p>But as the analysts studied the transmission, they realized that one of the voices was coming from <em>space</em> -low-Earth orbit to be exact- and the other voices were transmitting from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Soviet Kazakhstan, headquarters of the USSR&#8217;s space program. As the entire world would learn in a few hours, the 27-year-old cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin had just become the first human being to fly in space. As was typical with the Soviet space program, the launch had been kept a secret. The signals from space were probably the first inkling the United States had that it had been beaten in the space race once again.</p>
<p><strong><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-49461" title="240_gagarin" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/240_gagarin.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="152" />SECOND PLACE</strong></p>
<p>Gagarin had blasted off at 9:07 AM Moscow time on the morning of April 12th (Moscow was 12 hours ahead of Alaska). He made just one orbit around the Earth before landing back on Soviet soil at 10:55 AM. That&#8217;s not much of a space flight by modern standards, but in 1961 it stunned the world. Just as it had when it launched <em>Sputnik</em>, the world&#8217;s first artificial satellite, in October 1957, the Soviet Union had demonstrated that it, not the United States, was leading the way into space. The United States wouldn&#8217;t be able to send an American astronaut, John Glenn, into orbit until February 1962.</p>
<p><strong>JFK&#8217;s QUERY</strong></p>
<p>No one felt the sting of second place more than president John F. Kennedy. &#8220;Do we have a chance of beating the Soviets by putting a laboratory in space, or by a trip around the Moon, or by a rocket to land on the moon, or by a rocket to go to the moon and back with a man?&#8221; the president asked in a memo to his vice president, Lyndon Baines Johnson. &#8220;Is there any other space program which promises dramatic results in which we could win?&#8221;</p>
<p>JFK dispatched Johnson to NASA to get an answer. Wernher von Braun, head of rocket development, suggested that America had a chance of beating the Soviets in a flight <em>around</em> the Moon, but that it had an even bigger chance at being the first country to land a man on the Moon&#8217;s surface. JFK weighed the options, and on May 25, 1961, made his famous speech committing the United States to landing a man on the Moon by the end of the decade.</p>
<p><strong>NO CONTEST?</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-49462" title="200_usmoonlanding" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/200_usmoonlanding.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="160" />On July 20, 1969, the United States won the race to the Moon when astronaut Neil A. Armstrong became the first human being to set foot on lunar soil. But had the Soviets contemplated trying to beat the United States to the Moon? For more than two decades after the Moon landing, the official answer was a definitive, categorical &#8220;Nyet!&#8221; The Soviets claimed they skipped the Moon race in favor of the more practical challenge of putting a space station into Earth&#8217;s orbit. And they succeeded- between 1971 and 1986, they launched seven different space stations into orbit.</p>
<p>The Soviets stuck to their we-didn&#8217;t-shoot-for-the-Moon story until August 18, 1989, when the government&#8217;s official newspaper, <em>Izvestiya</em>, admitted that the USSR had indeed tried to send a cosmonaut to the Moon, in what was one of the most closely guarded secret programs of the Cold War. They had actually come pretty close to succeeding: Were it not for one large technical challenge that proved insurmountable, the Soviet Union might well have won the race.<br />
<span id="more-49458"></span><br />
When the Soviets were planning their lunar program, they faced the same question NASA had faced: Did they want to go in one large rocket, or did they want to use several launches of smaller rockets to assemble a lunar spacecraft in Earth&#8217;s orbit before heading to the Moon? Launching everything aboard one rocket was a quicker option, and since beating America to the Moon was a high priority, that&#8217;s what the Soviets chose to do. They set to work developing a rocket big enough for the job, called the N-1.</p>
<p><strong>DOWNSIZING</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_49463" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 230px"><img class="size-full wp-image-49463" title="220_SovietN1rocket" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/220_SovietN1rocket.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="346" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Soviet N-1 rocket</p></div>
<p>Using one rocket, no matter how big it is, severely limits the options on how to get to the moon and back, and because of this, the Soviets&#8217; secret program ended up looking a lot like the Apollo program, which also used one rocket, the Saturn V. But because the N-1 was smaller than the Saturn V, the Soviet mission would be smaller in many respects. It would have less room for cargo, and only two cosmonauts would make the trip, not three as on the Apollo missions. And that meant that only one cosmonaut would get to walk on the Moon, instead of two.</p>
<p>* The Soviet plans called for the N-1 rocket to lift a command ship called the <em>Lunniy Orbitalny Korabl</em> (LOK) into Earth&#8217;s orbit. The command ship would then travel to the Moon and enter lunar orbit. An attached lunar lander, call the <em>Lunniy Kabina</em> (&#8220;Lunar Cabin,&#8221; or LK, for short), would then separate from the LOK and descend to the lunar surface with one of the cosmonauts aboard. The other cosmonaut had to remain on the LOK.</p>
<p>* After spending about 24 hours on the surface of the Moon, the cosmonaut would climb back into the LK, launch back into lunar orbit, and dock with the LOK. Once the cosmonaut was safety back aboard the LOK, the LK would be jettisoned, and the LOK would fire its rocket, putting the craft on a return course to Earth. Then, when the LOK arrived in Earth&#8217;s orbit, the crew compartment would split apart from the rest of the LOK and re-enter the atmosphere with the cosmonauts aboard, parachuting to a landing somewhere inside the Soviet Union. The rest of the LOK would burn up on re-entry.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<div id="attachment_49465" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-49465  " title="500LOK" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/500LOK.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="317" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A model of the Lunniy Orbitalny Korabl (LOK)</p></div>
<p><strong>NOT QUITE APOLLO</strong></p>
<p>For all its similarities with the Apollo program, the Soviet lunar program did have its differences.</p>
<p>* Would you want to land on the Moon all by yourself while wearing an unwieldy spacesuit that&#8217;s difficult to move around in? What if you fell down -who would help you up? The Soviets were so worried about this possibility that they attached a device to the spacesuit that looked like a hula hoop. If the lone cosmonaut did fall on his back while walking on the Moon, he could use the hula hoop to roll over on his knees and stand back up.</p>
<div id="attachment_49464" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 240px"><img class="size-full wp-image-49464 " title="230_Sovietlander" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/230_Sovietlander.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="289" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Lunniy Kabina (LK)</p></div>
<p>* The Soviets were also worried about the LK becoming so damaged during landing that it would be unable to blast off from the Moon -landing a man on the Moon just to watch him die there would have been a human tragedy, not to mention a public relations disaster. The Soviets made plans to send a second LK to the Moon in advance of the mission &#8230;just in case.</p>
<p>* The second LK would have been useless if the cosmonaut landed too far away from it or couldn&#8217;t find it after landing on the Moon, so the Soviets also planned to send an unmanned, remote controlled rover to the Moon in advance of the manned landing. Its job would be to select landing sites for both the primary LK and the unmanned backup, and then serve as a landing beacon for both LKs. The rover would also be equipped with oxygen tanks and a platform for the cosmonaut to stand on, to enable it to ferry the cosmonaut to the backup LK if necessary.</p>
<p><strong>TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE</strong></p>
<p>So why didn&#8217;t the Soviets make it to the Moon? Part of the problem was that the Soviet leadership didn&#8217;t take the challenge seriously until it was too late to catch up with the Americans. Premiere Nikita Khrushchev endorsed the idea of a lunar program in 1962, but it wasn&#8217;t until 1964, more than three years after JFK put NASA on a course toward the Moon, that the Soviet leadership started committing resources to the project.</p>
<p>By then it probably would have been too late for them to catch up with the United States even under the best of circumstances, and the Soviets made the situation worse by designing the giant N-1 rocket so that it used 30 smaller rocket motors instead of fewer, more powerful motors. (NASA&#8217;s Saturn V used five rocket motors -that&#8217;s how it got its name.) Getting 30 rocket motors to work together in perfect unison without shaking each other apart is next to impossible, and the Soviets never did pull it off. The N-1 was only test launched four times -twice before Neil Armstrong landed on the Moon and twice afterward. All four tests ended in failure; the rockets either exploded or malfunctioned and had to be destroyed by Soviet ground control.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-49466" title="500_n1launch" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/500_n1launch.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="343" /></p>
<p><strong>SHHH!</strong></p>
<p>Given the open nature of the Apollo program and subsequent NASA missions, it&#8217;s difficult to absorb just how covert the Soviet Union&#8217;s manned lunar program was. Launches took place in complete secrecy, although the United States did have an inkling that a Soviet lunar program was underway. The N-1 rockets were nearly 40 stories tall, and once they were rolled out onto the launch pads, it wasn&#8217;t hard for American spy satellites to find them or for the CIA to guess what rockets that big were designed for.</p>
<p>On a few occasions, the U.S. government was even spooked into thinking they were about to lose the race to the Moon. In September 1968, for example, the U.S. detected the launch of a rocket from Baikonur and traced its course all the way to the Moon. They even detected the sound of a human voice in a radio signal transmitted from the spacecraft. Was this another Yuri Gagarin moment? This time, NASA got lucky -the voice was only a recording designed to test the spacecraft&#8217;s radio equipment.</p>
<p>NASA was so concerned about losing the space race that it sped up the pace of its operations. The Apollo 8 mission (December-21-27, 1968), only the second manned mission of the Apollo program, was originally intended to test equipment in Earth&#8217;s orbit. But the CIA was so convinced the the USSR was about to send cosmonauts on a flight around the Moon, NASA changed it to a circumlunar mission to keep the Soviets from beating them to the punch. Less than a year later, the Soviets -along with the rest of the world- watched the United States win the race.</p>
<p><strong>NOW WHAT?</strong></p>
<p>With that, the Soviet lunar program lost much of its purpose. For a time, the Soviets considered expanding the program to include a base on the Moon -if they couldn&#8217;t get there<em> first</em>, they reasoned, they could still get there <em>best</em>. But the lunar program was canceled in 1974 as the Soviet Union shifted its emphasis to building space stations.</p>
<p>In the early 1970s, NASA began work on a reusable space shuttle. When informed that the United States&#8217; shuttle would be able to carry military cargo over the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev ordered up a space shuttle of his own. &#8220;We are not country bumpkins here!&#8221; he is said to have shouted. The first American space shuttle, the <em>Columbia</em>, flew on April 12, 1981; the first Soviet shuttle, named the <em>Buran</em>, or &#8220;Snowstorm,&#8221; flew on November 15, 1988. The <em>Buran</em> only made a single, unmanned flight before the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 caused the program to be canceled.</p>
<p>Today the rivalry between the United States and Russian space programs is over, perhaps for good, as they work together with other countries in the International Space Station.</p>
<div id="attachment_49468" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-49468 " title="ISScrew" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ISScrew-500x365.png" alt="" width="500" height="365" /><p class="wp-caption-text">This NASA photo shows astronauts from the US, Russia, Japan, Canada, and Belgium together aboard the International Space Station (ISS) </p></div>
<p><strong>CABIN FEVER</strong></p>
<p>Not much remains of the Soviet manned lunar program more than 35 years after it was canceled. Remember, it wasn&#8217;t just canceled; it was officially, categorically denied until the late 1980s, and by then nearly everything that could be recycled or reused by the Soviet space program had long since disappeared. Some parts that couldn&#8217;t be used for anything else were made into storage sheds, airplane hangars, and even bandstands and children&#8217;s playgrounds in and around the Baikonur Cosmodrome. Four of the LKs did survive, however. If you ever make it to France, you can see one of them on display at EuroDisney.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">____________________________</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-49459" title="bri-unsinkable" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/bri-unsinkable.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="194" /> The article above is reprinted with permission from <em><a href="https://bathroomreader.theretailerplace.com/MLBX/actions/searchHandler.do?key=0007844209&amp;nextPage=booksDetails&amp;parentNum=11997" target="_blank">Uncle John&#8217;s Unsinkable Bathroom Reader</a>.</em></p>
<p>The Bathroom Readers&#8217; Institute has sailed the seas of science, history, pop culture, humor, and more to bring you Uncle John&#8217;s Unsinkable Bathroom Reader. Our all-new 21st edition is overflowing with over 500 pages of material that is sure to keep you fully absorbed.</p>
<p>Since 1988, the Bathroom Reader Institute has published a series of popular books containing irresistible bits of trivia and <a href="http://www.bathroomreader.com/pilot.asp?pg=throneroom">obscure yet fascinating facts</a>. Check out their website here: <a href="http://www.bathroomreader.com/">Bathroom Reader Institute</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/img4/bri-uncle-john-logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="67" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/18/the-secret-race-to-the-moon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Soviet Space Programs that Prove the USSR Was Insane</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/07/5-soviet-space-programs-that-prove-the-ussr-was-insane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/07/5-soviet-space-programs-that-prove-the-ussr-was-insane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soviet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=44311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Soviet Union used their space program as one of the front line battles of the Cold War. And for a time they were ahead, as anyone who remembers Sputnik and Gagarin will tell you. They had an edge in that reaching their goals was more important to the nation than the lives of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-44310" title="cosmonauts" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/cosmonauts-150x205.png" alt="" width="150" height="205" />The Soviet Union used their space program as one of the front line battles of the Cold War. And for a time they were ahead, as anyone who remembers Sputnik and Gagarin will tell you. They had an edge in that reaching their goals was more important to the nation than the lives of the cosmonauts. Documentation on the cosmonauts is limited, and some evidence has been altered, such as the disappearing cosmonaut in the photo here. Then there was Voskhod 2, the mission featuring the first space walk.</p>
<blockquote><p>The launch went up safely, got into an orbit, and a cosmonaut, Alexei Leonov, became the first human to perform a spacewalk. Super. But that was about when things took a turn for the cataclysmic.</p>
<p>On his way back in, Leonov&#8217;s spacesuit inflated due to the vacuum of space, which, apparently, the guys who designed the suit had never heard of. His suit was so laughably ballooney, in fact, that he could barely move and most definitely couldn&#8217;t fit back in the spaceship door. Leonov was forced to let some air out, all the while suffering from heatstroke and the bends. By the time his little 12 minute walk turned into a 20 minute walk, he was up to his knees in sweat. But he made it back in to the ship, safe and sound.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, things got worse for Voskhod 2 after that. Read all about it at Cracked. NSFW text. <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_19142_5-soviet-space-programs-that-prove-russia-was-insane.html" target="_blank">Link</a> -via <a href="http://reddit.com/" target="_blank">reddit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/07/5-soviet-space-programs-that-prove-the-ussr-was-insane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wonderful World of Big Science</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/15/the-wonderful-world-of-big-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/15/the-wonderful-world-of-big-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neatorama Exclusives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Genome Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large Hadron Collider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhattan Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Ignition Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Kamiokande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superconducting Super Collider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Very Large Array]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=25177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For most of its history, science has always been done by individual or at best a small group of scientists. World War II changed that: during the war, government-sponsored laboratories employing thousands of scientists sprung up to do large-scale research on weapons and technology. Since then, scientific research has entered a new era dubbed &#34;Big [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/wonderful-world-big-science.jpg" width="500" height="220"></p>
<p>For most of its history, science has always been done by individual or at best a small group of scientists. World War II changed that: during the war, government-sponsored laboratories employing thousands of scientists sprung up to do large-scale research on weapons and technology. Since then, scientific research has entered a new era dubbed &quot;Big Science&quot;.</p>
<p>Whether &quot;big&quot; science is any better than &quot;small&quot; science is a matter of controversy. Director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory Alvin Weinberg (who coined the term &quot;<em>Big Science</em>&quot; in the 1960s) defended the organization and big-budget financing of Big Science as the only way to continue research into progressively more complex scientific matters. On the other hand, science historian Paul Forman posited that defense-related funding by the government shifted the focus in physics from basic to applied research. </p>
<p>Whatever the answer, Big Science is here to stay. So let&#8217;s take a look at some of the biggest Big Science projects in the World:</p>
<h2>1. The Manhattan Project</h2>
<p>During World War II, <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/26/10-strange-facts-about-einstein/">urged by physicists Albert Einstein and Le&oacute; Szil&aacute;rd</a>, President Franklin Roosevelt sanctioned a secret government project to develop the world&#8217;s first atomic bomb. Dubbed the Manhattan Project, this secret weapon program employed more than 130,000 people over 30 different research and production sites and cost $2 billion ($24 billion in today&#8217;s dollar).</p>
<p>The Manhattan Project was initially called the Laboratory for the Development of Substitute Metals (a purposely deceptive cover name by the military). Concerned that even that name would attract too much attention, the military changed it to the Manhattan Engineer District or the Manhattan Project for short.</p>
<p>The very first problem facing the scientists was how to initiate a controlled and self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction. In 1942, scientists at the University of Chicago&#8217;s &quot;Metallurgical Laboratory&quot; (yes, another cover name) achieved such a reaction. Physicist Arthur Compton promptly placed a coded telephone call to Washington, D.C., saying &quot;The Italian navigator has landed in the new world, the natives are friendly.&quot; And so began the atomic age.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/oak-ridge-manhattan-project.jpg" width="500" height="491"><br />What Happens in Oak Ridge, Stays in Oak Ridge: World War II-era billboard at the Oak Ridge Facility, part of the Manhattan Project. (Photo: <a href="http://images.google.com/hosted/life/l?imgurl=a15feada6666ff89">Life</a>)</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/calutron-y-12.jpg" width="500" height="367"><br />Calutron at the secret Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. It was used to enrich the uranium fuel required for nuclear weapons. (Source: <a href="http://www.y12.doe.gov/about/history/getimages.php">DOE</a>)</p>
<p>Perhaps what&#8217;s more remarkable than making the first atomic bomb was that the scientists managed to keep the mega project secret, <a href="http://www.anl.gov/Science_and_Technology/History/Anniversary_Frontiers/italnav.html">even from their wives</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>At a social gathering a few days later, Laura Fermi noticed her husband being bombarded with congratulations. She wanted to know why, but no one would give her a reason. Woods finally whispered to her: &quot;He has sunk a Japanese admiral!&quot; When Laura Fermi asked her husband if that was true, he replied, &quot;Did I?&quot; The obvious next question was asked: &quot;So you didn&#8217;t sink a Japanese admiral?&quot; Without changing his sincere expression, Fermi said, &quot;Didn&#8217;t I?&quot; Laura Fermi would not learn of the events of December 2 for another two-and-a-half years. </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The very first nuclear explosion was conducted on July 16, 1945 in Alamogordo, New Mexico. The detonation was equivalent to the explosion of about 20 kiloton of TNT. It marked the beginning of the Atomic Age.</p>
<p align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XH907H1wadE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XH907H1wadE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br />[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH907H1wadE">YouTube Clip</a>]</p>
<p>(Note: the history of the Manhattan Project is very fascinating. Interested readers are highly recommended to read the early history of the Manhattan Project over at Argonne National Laboratory: <a href="http://www.anl.gov/Science_and_Technology/History/Anniversary_Frontiers/probo.html">Link</a>)</p>
<h2>2. Space Race</h2>
<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/sputnik-1.jpg" width="150" height="140" class="imageleft">Although it&#8217;s debatable whether &quot;science&quot; was much of a part of the Space Race, there&#8217;s no doubt that it definitely filled the &quot;Big&quot; part of &quot;Big Science.&quot; From 1957 to 1975, the United States spent approximately $100 billion competing with the Soviet Union in space exploration. </p>
<p>The Space Race was kicked off in 1957, when the Soviet Union launched <em>Sputnik-1</em>, making it the first space power. A couple of months later, they launched <em>Sputnik-2</em> with the first living passenger to go to space, Laika the dog. Then Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin became the first human in space when he orbited Earth in 1961. There&#8217;s no question that the Soviet Union took the early lead (United States&#8217; first attempt at space exploration, the Vanguard rocket, pathetically blew up on the launching pad).</p>
<p>In 1961, President Kennedy proclaimed that Americans would land a man on the Moon before the decade was out. In public, Kennedy said that NASA&#8217;s Apollo Program would benefit the economy, close the missile gap in which the Soviets have more ballistic missile weapons than the Americans, and spur science and technology in the United States. In private, Kennedy said that his main motivation was to beat the Soviet Unions and show them who&#8217;s better.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/buzz-aldrin.jpg" width="500" height="500"><br />Astronaut Buzz Aldrin on the moon, photo taken by Neil Armstrong (Photo: NASA) </p>
<p align="center"> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RMINSD7MmT4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RMINSD7MmT4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br />Video of the very first moon landing of the Apollo 11 mission [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7MmT4">YouTube Clip</a>]</p>
<p>In 1969, Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong became the first man to set foot on the lunar surface. The momentous event marked the apex of the Space Race, and intense rivalries between the US and the Soviet Union dwindled from that point on. In 1975, the Space Race came to an end with the rendezvous of the Apollo and the Soyuz spacecraft in orbit.</p>
<h2>3. Human Genome Project</h2>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/human-chromosome.jpg" width="500" height="334"><br />Fluorescent <em>In-Situ</em> Hybridization identification of human chromosomes (better known as &quot;chromosome painting&quot;). This technique uses DNA probes attached to fluorescent markers to identify the various human chromosomes. Photo: <a href="http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/FISH_chromosome_painting.html">Steven M. Carr</a></p>
<p>Not all Big Science projects are physics and engineering. The Human Genome Project is a project to sequence the entire 3 billion chemical base pairs that make up the human DNA and identify all the estimated 20,000 to 25,000 genes that make up our genome.</p>
<p>The project formally began in 1990, and was estimated to take 15 years to complete. In contrast to other Big Science projects listed here, the Human Genome Project was actually completed two years earlier than expected due to better technology (take that, physics!). The final sequencing of human DNA was completed in 2003, though analysis of the data is ongoing till today.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to envision the benefits that the Human Genome Project for humanity: advances in understanding our genetics would undoubtedly aid medicine and research to cure diseases. But some people point out that the <a href="http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/elsi.shtml">ethical, legal and social costs</a> may be high: who owns and should have access to our genetic information? Do people&#8217;s genes make them behave in a particular way and if so, how would this factor in determining guilt or innocence when it comes to criminal behaviors?</p>
<h2>4. International Space Station</h2>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/atlantis-mir.jpg" width="500" height="439"><br />Space Shuttle Atlantis docked to the Russian Mir Space Station in 1995 (Photo: NASA)</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/iss.jpg" width="500" height="374"><br />The International Space Station in 2009 (Photo: NASA)</p>
<p>Hands down, the biggest Big Science project ever launched is so big, so expensive, and so ambitious that it is &#8211; literally &#8211; out of this world. The International Space Station, a joint collaboration of space agencies of a couple dozens of countries, is not so much a scientific project as an exercise of engineering prowess and political will.</p>
<p>The ISS is so expensive that it&#8217;s hard to pin down its actual cost. The European Space Agency estimates that the entire station costs &euro;100 billion over a period of 30 years. Critics pointed out that the amount of science being done is paltry as compared to the sums of money being spent, but its advocates defended the program as a necessary first step towards manned exploration of space.</p>
<h2>5. Hubble Space Telescope</h2>
<p>In 1923, pioneers of modern rocketry imagined that rockets could propel a telescope in Earth&#8217;s orbit, but it wasn&#8217;t until the late 1970s that the <a href="http://hubblesite.org/">Hubble Space Telescope</a> project got off the ground (after an intense lobbying of Congress by astronomers, no less).</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/hubble-discovery.jpg" width="500" height="506"><br />Hubble Space Telescope released by the Space Shuttle Discovery in 1990 <br />(Photo: NASA/IMAX)</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/hubble-space-telescope.jpg" width="500" height="404"><br />Hubble Space Telescope, as seen from the Space Shuttle Discovery on its second servicing mission in 1997 (Photo: NASA)</p>
<p>Like many Big Science projects, the Hubble Space Telescope was fraught with errors and setbacks. The <em>Challenger</em> disaster brought US space program to a halt and forced the project to be postponed for years. When the telescope was finally launched, scientists found that it was out of focus because its primary mirror had been ground to the wrong shape! The telescope became the butt of jokes (an editorial cartoon likened the telescope as being built by the nearsighted Mr. Magoo)</p>
<p>Three years later, scientists gave the telescope a new set of &quot;eyeglasses&quot; and Hubble began producing some of the most fantastic images from space ever seen. The telescope went from being the butt of jokes into the apple of Big Science&#8217;s eye.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/pillars-of-creation-eagle-nebula.jpg" width="500" height="494"><br />&quot;Pillars of Creation&quot;, the star-forming pillars in the Eagle Nebula, one of Hubbles&#8217; most famous photos. Image: NASA, Jeff Hester, and Paul Scowen (Arizona State University)</p>
<p>In its nearly two decades of service, the Hubble Space Telescope has snapped over 570,000 pictures of the birth and deaths of stars and galaxies. </p>
<h2>6. Super Kamiokande</h2>
<p>Every second, 50 trillion solar neutrinos pass through your body so it&#8217;s no wonder that this &quot;ghostly&quot; elementary particle is so darned difficult to detect. But that doesn&#8217;t deter physicists building the <a href="http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sk/index-e.html">Super Kamiokande</a> (Super-K, if you want to be cute) neutrino detector in Japan.</p>
<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/super-kamiokande-1.jpg" width="500" height="402"></p>
<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/super-kamiokande-2.jpg" width="500" height="744"></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/super-kamiokande-3.jpg" width="500" height="663"><br />All photos from the <a href="http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sk/gallery/index-e.html">Super Kamiokande Photo Gallery</a></p>
<p>The Super-K is basically a tank filled with 50,000 tons of ultra-pure water, buried some 1,000 m (3,280 ft) underground. The idea is that once in a great while, a neutrino will interact with electrons or nuclei of water that will create a detectable electromagnetic radiation called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation">Cherenkov radiation</a> (the blue glow we usually see in nuclear reactor cores).</p>
<h2>7. Superconducting Super Collider</h2>
<p>Perhaps the most difficult part of a Big Science project is actually not science &#8211; it&#8217;s the politics, and there&#8217;s no better example of this fact than the birth and demise of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) in Texas.</p>
<p>In late 1982, Fermilab Director Leon Lederman proposed a gigantic particle accelerator that would be the world&#8217;s largest. Dubbed &quot;The Machine in the Desert&quot; or Desertron, the particle accelerator would be 54 miles long tubes of capable of producing enough energy to snag the Holy Grail of particle physics, the elusive Higgs Boson.</p>
<p>Initial estimate of the project pegged the cost at $3 billion, but in just a couple of years, the projected total cost had quadrupled to $12 billion and the SSC became a political football. In 1992, the Collider was killed by the House only to be resurrected by the Senate (&quot;It&#8217;s not the science, it&#8217;s the jobs&quot;). The next year, the House killed it again and the Senate revived it again (&quot;It&#8217;s actually not the jobs, it&#8217;s America&#8217;s supremacy in science&quot;). A few months later they ran out of excuses, the House killed the SSC again and this time, it stayed dead.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/superconducting-supercollider.jpg" width="480" height="477"><br />Photo: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory</p>
<p>When it was cancelled, $2 billion had been spent and some 23 km (14 mi) of tunnels had been dug, thus leaving Texas with a super-sized hole in the ground.</p>
<h2>8. Very Large Array</h2>
<p>Remember the scene in the 1997 movie Contact, where the character played by Jodie Foster received signals from outer space? All those antennas are actually real &#8211; they&#8217;re part of the radio astronomy observatory in New Mexico called the Very Large Array (VLA).</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/vla-1.jpg" width="500" height="334"><br />Very Large Array (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mexicaliblues/473645909/">Lee Otis</a> [Flickr])</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/vla-moon.jpg" width="500" height="333"><br />Very Large Array and the Moon (Photo: NRAO/AUI)</p>
<p>The National Radio Astronomy Observatory&#8217;s VLA is composed of 27 radio antennas in a Y-shaped configuration, located on the Plains of San Agustin, New Mexico. Each antenna is 25 m (82 ft) in diameter and weighs about 230-ton. They&#8217;re programmed to work together as a single instrument (hence the name).</p>
<p>The Very Large Array is actually going to be even larger &#8211; 8 new stations as distant as 250 km (155 mi) from the current array are planned (but not yet funded).</p>
<h2>9. National Ignition Facility</h2>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/national-ignition-facility.jpg" width="500" height="333"><br />Laser beams entering the target chamber at the NIF. Photo: Dave Bullock (more at his gallery at <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2009/05/gallery_nif">Wired</a>)</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/nif-target-chamber.jpg" width="500" height="502"><br />The interior of the NIF target chamber (Photo: <a href="https://lasers.llnl.gov/multimedia/photo_gallery/">Lawrence Livermore National Lab</a>)</p>
<p>The mild name of the National Ignition Facility belies one big fact: it is the world&#8217;s largest laser, capable of heating and compressing a small amount of hydrogen fuel to the point of nuclear fusion. Simply said, the NIF recreates the condition of an exploding star right here on Earth.</p>
<p>The NIF is designed to deliver nearly 2 million joules of ultraviolet laser energy in billionth-of-a-second pulses onto a target of hydrogen fuel smaller than a match head, heating it up to 100 million degrees while simultaneously subjecting it to pressures 100 billion times Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. If everything goes well (and that&#8217;s a very big if &#8211; there&#8217;s a lot that could go wrong. For instance, the NIF has some 60,000 points of control, 30 times as many as on the space shuttle), it would deliver the holy grail of energy: nuclear fusion.</p>
<p>The NIF is so full of technical marvels that it&#8217;s hard to pick just one to highlight. But if we had to pick one, it would be this: when fired, the pulses of NIF&#8217;s 192 laser beams &#8211; comprised of nearly 60 miles of mirrors, fiber optics, crystals and amplifiers &#8211; must arrive within trillionths of a second of each other and must strike within 50 micrometers on the target. The NIF website describes it as such:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>NIF&#8217;s pointing accuracy can be compared to standing on the pitcher&#8217;s mound at AT&amp;T Park in San Francisco and throwing a strike at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles, some 350 miles away (<a href="https://lasers.llnl.gov/programs/nif/about.php">Source</a>).</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h2>10. Large Hadron Collider</h2>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/large-hadron-collider.jpg" width="500" height="332"><br />Photo: Maximilien Brice, CERN</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/cms-detector.jpg" width="500" height="459"><br />CMS Detector commissioning in Cessy, France, VR Photography by <a href="http://petermccready.com/portfolio/08082003.html">Peter McCready</a></p>
<p>If there&#8217;s a science project that is synonymous with Big Science, it&#8217;s CERN&#8217;s Large Hadron Collider (LHC).</p>
<p>Everything about this project is big: at 27 km (17 mi) circumference, the LHC is the world&#8217;s largest and highest-energy particle accelerator. It is built by over 10,000 scientists and engineers from hundreds of universities and laboratories from over 100 countries.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s expensive, too: the LHC cost the member countries of CERN and other participating countries an estimated &euro;4.6 billion (about US$ 6.4 billion), not including extras like detectors and computing capacity (an additional &euro;1.43 billion).</p>
<p>The risks are also big. Doomsday scenarios include micro black holes with a mass of Mt. Everest, killer strangelets, magnetic monopoles, and vacuum bubbles which would pop all of us out of existence.</p>
<p>For more, see:<br />- <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/12/10-things-about-the-large-hadron-collider-you-wanted-to-know-but-were-afraid-to-ask/">10 Things About the LHC You Wanted to Know But Were Afraid to Ask</a> <br />- <a href="http://shop.neatorama.com/product-info.php?i-survived-the-large-hadron-collider-t-shirt-pid104.html">I Survived the Large Hadron Collider T-Shirt</a></p>
<hr size="1">
<p><strong>More Fun Science &amp; Tech Articles on Neatorama:</strong></p>
<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/25/the-wonderful-world-of-early-computing/"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/babbage-engine.jpg" width="150" height="130" border="0"></a></p>
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/02/07/the-evolution-of-tech-companies-logos/"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/tech-logo.jpg" width="150" height="130" border="0"></a></div>
</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/06/9-laws-of-physics-that-dont-apply-in-hollywood/"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/gravity-lessons.jpg" width="150" height="122" border="0"></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/01/25/the-wonderful-world-of-early-computing/">Wonderful World of Early Computing</a></div>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/02/07/the-evolution-of-tech-companies-logos/">Evolution of Tech Logos</a></div>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/06/9-laws-of-physics-that-dont-apply-in-hollywood/">9 Laws of Physics That Don&#8217;t Apply in Hollywood</a></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/06/27/top-10-strangest-anti-terrorism-patents/"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/terrorism-patent.jpg" width="150" height="130" border="0"></a></div>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/30/30-strangest-animal-mating-habits/"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/animal-mating-habits.jpg" width="150" height="130" border="0"></a></div>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/08/22/5-really-weird-things-about-water/"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/hydrogen-bond.jpg" width="150" height="130" border="0"></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/06/27/top-10-strangest-anti-terrorism-patents/">Top 10 Strangest Anti-Terrorism Patents </a></div>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/30/30-strangest-animal-mating-habits/">30 Strangest Animal <br />Mating Habits</a></div>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/08/22/5-really-weird-things-about-water/">5 Really Weird Things About Water</a></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/15/the-wonderful-world-of-big-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:24:53 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.492 seconds -->
