<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; sagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/sagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:29:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fashion Police Thwarted: Sagging is Legal</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/01/fashion-police-thwarted-sagging-is-legal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/01/fashion-police-thwarted-sagging-is-legal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saggy pants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/01/fashion-police-thwarted-sagging-is-legal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may look ridiculous, but in the United States, it&#8217;s protected by the Constitution. That&#8217;s right, folks! Sagging &#8211; the strange customs of wearing one&#8217;s pants below one&#8217;s waist (and sometimes butt) is legal: You have the right to look ridiculous. A Bronx judge has thrown out a summons issued against a Bronx man for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2010-07/sagging.jpg" width="150" height="270" class="imageleft">It may look ridiculous, but in the United States, it&#8217;s protected by the Constitution. That&#8217;s right, folks! Sagging &#8211; the strange customs of wearing one&#8217;s pants below one&#8217;s waist (and sometimes butt) is legal:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>You have the right to look ridiculous.</em></p>
<p><em> A Bronx judge has thrown out a summons issued against a Bronx man for wearing saggy pants, finding that &quot;the Constitution still leaves some opportunity for people to be foolish if they so desire.&quot;</em></p>
<p><em> Judge Ruben Franco said that although Julio Martinez may have offended the fashion police with his low-hanging and underwear-exposing pants, his manner of dress didn&#8217;t deserve a ticket from a cop.</em></p>
<p> <em>&quot;While most of us may consider it distasteful, and indeed foolish, to wear one&#8217;s pants so low as to expose the underwear . . . people can dress as they please, wear anything, so long as they do not offend public order and decency,&quot; the judge wrote.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p> <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/crack_is_back_TBpsdZXuiM1zK9tQIAkmdM">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/01/fashion-police-thwarted-sagging-is-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Saggy Pants For You</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/16/no-saggy-pants-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/16/no-saggy-pants-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Harness</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/16/no-saggy-pants-for-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least, not if you live in Jackson, Mississippi. Although the city council voted down his proposition to outlaw saggy pants, Mayor Frank Melton has declared he will illegalize the fashion style by use of executive order. I wonder how the council will take this, since they said it was an unconstitutional thing to implement. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/200901161238.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-22090" title="200901161238" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/200901161238-150x210.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="210" /></a>At least, not if you live in Jackson, Mississippi. Although the city council voted down his proposition to outlaw saggy pants, Mayor Frank Melton has declared he will illegalize the fashion style by use of executive order. I wonder how the council will take this, since they said it was an unconstitutional thing to implement.</p>
<p>&#8220;I certainly respect the Constitution,&#8221; Melton said, &#8220;but we have some issues that are much bigger than the Constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know Neatorama tries to stay unpolitical, but it is crucial for all of us to stand up and declare our rights to sag our pants.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/15/quotable-15/">Link</a> Via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net">Boing Boing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/16/no-saggy-pants-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:30:15 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1113 seconds -->
