<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; ReMax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/remax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:42:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Logo Fight: Re/Max vs. Rehava</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/10/logo-fight-remax-vs-rehava/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/10/logo-fight-remax-vs-rehava/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rehava]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReMax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/10/logo-fight-remax-vs-rehava/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do the two logos look similar to you? They do, according to the trademark attorneys of Re/Max, a national real estate franchise. They&#8217;re challenging the trademark application of a real estate startup Rehava, which has a new commission structure that is different than the established culture: Adam Scoville, Re/Max&#8217;s legal counsel, said he can explain. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-03/remax-vs-rehava.jpg" width="492" height="68"></p>
<p>Do the two logos look similar to you? They do, according to the trademark attorneys of Re/Max, a national real estate franchise. They&#8217;re challenging the trademark application of a real estate startup <a href="http://www.rehava.com/">Rehava</a>, which has a new commission structure that is different than the established culture:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Adam Scoville, Re/Max&#8217;s legal counsel, said he can explain.</em></p>
<p><em>First of all, both names start with &quot;r&quot; and have logos with accent lines near the letter &quot;e,&quot; he said.</em></p>
<p><em>&quot;It goes beyond that,&quot; Scoville added. &quot;If you chop the top off of the &#8216;h,&#8217; you (almost) have the &#8216;m&#8217; in Re/Max. The next letter is an &#8216;a,&#8217; and if you take the &#8216;v&#8217; then you have half of an &#8216;x.&#8217; &quot;</em></p>
<p><em>Steve deGuzman, Rehava&#8217;s broker-in-charge, said he doesn&#8217;t buy it. He said the trademark challenge is harassment and a form of corporate bullying that will cost his firm thousands of dollars.</em></p>
<p><em>&quot;It&#8217;s a huge distraction, particularly for a startup and also in this kind of a market,&quot; deGuzman said.</em></p>
<p><em>He suspects the Colorado-based franchise is challenging the trademarkbecause of Rehava&#8217;s controversial commission rebates, which some in the industry see as a threat to traditional compensation standards. </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.charleston.net/news/2009/mar/07/its_big_guy_vs_little_guy74198/">Link</a> &#8211; via <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/82zt1/do_these_logos_look_anything_alike/c083qyq">reddit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/10/logo-fight-remax-vs-rehava/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:41:16 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1111 seconds -->
