<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; Matt Jefferies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/matt-jefferies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>8 Starship Enterprise Facts Every Trekker Should Know</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/15/8-starship-enterprise-facts-every-trekker-should-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/15/8-starship-enterprise-facts-every-trekker-should-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neatorama Exclusives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene roddenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JJ Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Jefferies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701), the starship in the original Star Trek TV series To boldly go where no man has gone before, you'd need a really good starship - and to launch Star Trek, the pop culture phenomenon that entertained and inspired millions, you'd need a pretty darned good one! And that is exactly what the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/uss-enterprise-ncc-1701.jpg" width="500" height="281"><br>
        USS Enterprise (NCC-1701), the starship in the original Star Trek TV series</p>
      <p>To boldly go where no man has gone before, you'd need a really good starship 
        - and to launch Star Trek, the pop culture phenomenon that entertained 
        and inspired millions, you'd need a pretty darned good one! And that is 
        exactly what the United Space Starship Enterprise delivered. Here are 
        8 Starship Enterprise facts every Trekker should know:</p>
      <h2>1. Meet the REAL Enterprise<em> </em>(Several of Them, Actually)</h2>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/hms-enterprise.jpg" width="500" height="221"><br>
        (L) The tenth HMS Enterprise, an Arctic survey sloop (1848), painting 
        by WH Browne from the <a href="http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/prints/viewPrint.cfm?ID=PAD6191">National 
        Maritime Museum online collection</a>; <br>
        (R) USS Enterprise at Valcour Island, Lake Champlain, New York (1776) 
        from <a href="http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c12/congress-vi.htm">Dictionary 
        of American Naval Fighting Ships</a></p>
      <p>Before Star Trek, there have been many actual ships named Enterprise. 
        The very first one of note was a French frigate L'Enterprise, which was 
        captured by the British Royal Navy in 1705 and renamed as HMS Enterprise. 
        It served as a British gun ship until it was wrecked just two years later. 
        After this ship, there were 14 other HMS also named Enterprise (sometimes 
        spelled Enterprize).</p>
      <p>The United States have 8 battleships named Enterprise, including the 
        first nuclear powered aircraft carrier in the world. The very first one 
        (before the US became a country, so technically it was a ship of the Continental 
        Navy) was an armed sloop on Lake Champlain in 1775 named the United States 
        Ship (USS) Enterprise.</p>
      <p>During the American Civil War, aeronaut and scientist Thaddeus S.C. Lowe 
        built a balloon named <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_(balloon)">Enterprise</a>, 
        to be used by the Union Army to perform aerial recon on Confederate troops.</p>
      <p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/enterprise-balloon-shuttle-vss.jpg" width="500" height="217"></p>
      <p align="center">(L) Enterprise, a gas inflated aerostat (1858); (M) Space 
        Shuttle Enterprise; (R) Artist rendering of VSS Enterprise</p>
      <p>And who can forget the Space Shuttle Enterprise? It was the very first 
        Space Shuttle orbiter, built for NASA in 1976. The Shuttle was supposed 
        to be named Constitution, but a write-in campaign successfully persuaded 
        NASA to name it after the Star Trek starship. (Interestingly, the fictional 
        Starship Enterprise was a Constitution-class vessel - coincidence? Hm....)</p>
      <p>The last actual Enterprise hasn't been built yet but it already has a 
        name: Virgin Space Ship (VSS) Enterprise and yes, it's an homage to Star 
        Trek. It's a suborbital spaceplane being built by Sir Richard Branson 
        of Virgin for the purposes of space tourism. </p>
      <p>Ironically, when Sir Richard offered the first flight to William Shatner, 
        the actor declined and revealed that he's actually afraid of space travel, 
        &quot;<em>I'm interested in man's march into the unknown but to vomit 
        in space is not my idea of a good time. Neither is a fiery crash with 
        the vomit hovering over me.</em>&quot; Shatner added that he's not entirely 
        against the idea - he just needed some reassurance. &quot;<em>I do want 
        to go up but I need guarantees I'll definitely come back.</em>&quot; (<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-403931/Captain-Kirk-reveals-wont-boldly-space.html">Source</a>)</p>
      <h2>2. No Rockets, Jets or Firestreams</h2>
      <p>Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, who <a href="http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/misc/40_years/trek_pitch.pdf">pitched 
        the TV show</a> as &quot;Wagon Train to the Stars,&quot; didn't tell art 
        director <a href="http://www.mattjefferies.com/">Matt Jefferies</a> what 
        Starship Enterprise should look like, instead he told the bewildered art 
        director what he did <em>not</em> want to see. <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20061231154831/http://www.lcarscom.net/fsd/art/1701.html">Starship 
        Concept Art</a> has reprint of a nifty article in <em>Star Trek: The Magazine</em> 
        by Jefferies about the design process:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p><em>&quot;In my approach to Star Trek I wanted to be as practical as 
          possible,&quot; Jefferies says. &quot;I could tell Gene was serious 
          enough, but I really didn't know where to start. I knew the Enterprise 
          was going to be on the cutting edge of the future, but essentially he 
          gave me the job of finding a shape, and I didn't know what the shape 
          looked like.&quot; Although Roddenberry knew a lot about his ship, he 
          had never visualized it, and consequently made the situation more complicated 
          since he couldn't give Jefferies a detailed sense of direction. According 
          to Jefferies, Roddenberry was absolutely clear to avoid any resemblance 
          to a 1960's rocket ship. &quot;Gene described the 100-150 man crew, 
          outer space, fantastic, unheard-of speed, and that we didn't have to 
          worry about gravity. He had emphasized that there were to be no fins, 
          no wings, no smoke trails, no flames, no rocket. </em></p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>After hundreds of drawings, Jefferies came up with this:</p>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/enterprise-matt-jefferies.jpg" width="500" height="350"><br>
        Image via <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20061231154831/http://www.lcarscom.net/fsd/art/1701.html">Starship 
        Concept Art</a></p>
      <p>In his honor, the crawl spaces on all of the Starfleet starships on Star 
        Trek are called Jefferies tubes.</p>
      <h2>3. The Original Name of USS <em>Enterprise</em></h2>
      <p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/uss-yorktown.jpg" width="150" height="142" class="imageleft">That's 
        right - the iconic starship wasn't always named USS Enterprise ... in 
        the original draft, Roddenberry named it USS Yorktown after a World War 
        II aircraft carrier. The starship was commanded by Captain Robert April, 
        then Christopher Pike, before Roddenberry settled on James Tiberius Kirk.</p>
      <p>By the way, William Shatner was the third choice for Kirk. The role was 
        offered to Lloyd Bridges and Jack Lord, both of whom declined it.</p>
      <h2>4. The Origin of NCC-1701</h2>
      <p>How did the famous USS Enterprise get its registration number NCC-1701 
        is the stuff of legend. There are conflicting stories, including one where 
        1701 is a tribute to Roddenberry's childhood neighbor's house number or 
        that Jefferies got it from the registration number of his airplane. </p>
      <p>Here's Matt Jefferies' explanation when he was asked during a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/st/interviews/jefferies/page6.shtml">BBC 
        Interview</a>:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p> <em>NC, by international agreement, stood for all United States commercial 
          vehicles. Russia had wound up with four Cs, CC CC. It&#8217;d been pretty 
          much a common opinion that any major effort in space would be two expensive 
          for any one country, so I mixed the US and the Russian and came up with 
          NCC.</em></p>
        <p><em>The one seven zero part - I needed a number that would be instantly 
          identifiable, and three, six, eight and nine are too easily confused. 
          I don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;ll confuse a one and a seven, or the 
          zero. So the one seven stood for the seventeenth basic ship design in 
          the Federation, and the zero one would have been serial number one, 
          the first bird.</em></p>
      </blockquote><br>
      <h2>5. Land the Ship? Too Expensive, Let's Teleport Everybody Instead!</h2>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/star-trek-transporter.jpg" width="500" height="389"></p>
      <p>Originally, Roddenberry envisioned the USS Enterprise to land on various 
        planets, but it turned out to be too expensive as it would require them 
        to build expensive sets. The next idea was to use shuttles - but when 
        filming began, the full-sized shooting model wasn't ready. So, they came 
        up with the idea of &quot;beaming down&quot; the crew via a teleportation 
        device and thus the transporter was born! (<a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/galleries/235735-1/Teleporters-Star-Trek-weapons-and-gadgets.htm">Source</a>)</p>
      <p>In 1994, TIME Magazine <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,981892,00.html">interviewed</a> 
        Star Trek technical expert Michael Okuda about the intricacies of the 
        transporter:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p><em><strong>&quot;It should be possible if we decompile the pattern 
          buffer.&quot;</strong></em></p>
        <p><em>Transporters can send people instantly from one location to another 
          by converting their molecules into energy, then reassembling them. Every 
          living being has a distinct pattern of molecules; the pattern buffer 
          fixes the configuration by adjusting for the Doppler effect -- the apparent 
          change in the frequency of the energy waves caused by motion.</em></p>
        <p><em><strong>&quot;I'll verify the Heisenberg compensators.&quot;</strong></em></p>
        <p><em>The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that you cannot know 
          a subatomic particle's exact position and its exact direction and velocity 
          at the same time. To transport people you have to know all those things, 
          so the Heisenberg compensator was devised to overcome that problem. 
          It's an attempt by the Trek writers to signal that they are at least 
          aware of the issue. And how does the Heisenberg compensator work? &quot;It 
          works very well, thank you,&quot; says Okuda.</em></p>
      </blockquote>
      <h2>6. The Next Gen Enterprise: Hilton in Space</h2>
      <p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/matt-jefferies.jpg" width="150" height="131" class="imageleft">Jefferies 
        designed the bridge in the original USS Enterprise in the style of a Navy 
        battleship, with specialized workstations for its crew. When set designer 
        Richard James updated the bridge for Star Trek: The Next Generation<em> 
        </em>(restriction: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/st/interviews/james/page3.shtml">no 
        purple</a>!), Jefferies was asked about the new look. To which he replied:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p><em>Gene asked me how I liked the show, and I said that he had taken 
          the bridge of my ship and turned it into the lobby of the Hilton. And 
          I have just never watched any of them since. I&#8217;m lost.</em></p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>Ironically, Star Trek and Hilton actually did come together to create 
        a theme attraction. Star Trek: The Experience opened in 1998 at the Las 
        Vegas Hilton. It closed in 2008 due to low attendance (though it is due 
        to re-open in a different location in 2010).</p>
      <h2>7. The Original Star Trek Enterprise Prop</h2>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-05/star-trek-enterprise-model-smithsonian.jpg" width="500" height="415"><br>
        Photo: Carolyn Russo / Smithsonian</p>
      <p> If you visit the National Air and Space Museum at the Smithsonian, definitely 
        check out the <a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/visit/concessions/shops/enterprise.cfm">actual 
        model of the Starship <em>Enterprise</em></a> used in the filming of the 
        original Star Trek TV show.</p>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-05/enterprise-model-arrival-smithsonian.jpg" width="500" height="383"><br>
        The hull and one nacelle of the original Star Trek Starship Enterprise 
        model as it was received by the National Air and Space Museum from Paramount 
        Studios on March 1, 1974. Image WEB11192-2009. Photo: <a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/imagedetail.cfm?imageID=2206">Smithsonian</a> 
        (with permission) </p>
      <p>The model of the Enterprise was sent to the museum in crates, donated 
        by Paramount Studios five years after the series ended. </p>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-05/enterprise-model-smithsonian.jpg" width="500" height="402"><br>
        Enterprise during its first Smithsonian restoration. SI Neg #74-3977. 
        Photo: <a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/imagedetail.cfm?imageID=2207">Smithsonian</a> 
        (with permission)</p>
      <p>The Smithsonian performed extensive restoration to put the starship model 
        back together, and for the first time ever, the photos of the restoration 
        process are available to the public at the museum's blog.</p>
      <p>The Museum Registrar Gregory K.H. Bryant has more on this behind the 
        scenes look at the icon science fiction model: <a href="http://blog.nasm.si.edu/2009/06/04/starship_restoration/">Link</a> 
        - <em>Thanks Llori!</em></p>
      <h2>8. The Hot-Rod Starship Enterprise</h2>
      <p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/star-trek-enterprise-jj-abrams.jpg" width="500" height="226"></p>
      <p>For his movie Star Trek, director J.J. Abrams decided that the USS Enterprise 
        could use a face-lift and worked with artists at Industrial Light &amp; 
        Magic to update the starship - like Roddenberry, he gave a simple directive:</p>
      <blockquote>
        <p><em>&quot;He wanted a hot-rod type of vehicle, but they also wanted 
          to preserve the Enterprise kind of look,&quot; model maker John Goodson 
          said in a presentation at ILM's San Francisco headquarters earlier this 
          month.</em></p>
        <p><em>&quot;J.J. Abrams kept saying, 'Make it a bigger movie. Make it 
          a bigger shot,'&quot; creative director David Nakabayashi added. &quot;I 
          think that's one thing you see in this film, at least: The stuff I've 
          seen is just everything is big.&quot;</em></p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>SCI FI Wire has the interview with model maker John Goodson and visual 
        effects supervisor Roger Guyett about the new Enterprise: <a href="http://scifiwire.com/2009/04/how-ilm-came-up-with-the.php">Link</a></p>
      <p>The official website for JJ Abram's Star Trek movie has a nifty 360&deg; 
        panorama of the bridge of the new starship:</p>
      <p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-06/star-trek-enterprise-jj-abrams-bridge.jpg" width="500" height="408"></p>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/15/8-starship-enterprise-facts-every-trekker-should-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:59:39 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0921 seconds -->
