<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; liberalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/liberalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives and Liberals Have Different Brain Anatomy</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/09/conservatives-and-liberals-have-different-brain-anatomy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/09/conservatives-and-liberals-have-different-brain-anatomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryota Kanai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/09/conservatives-and-liberals-have-different-brain-anatomy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lefty or righty? A new study links a larger anterior cingulate cortex (left) to politically liberal views and a larger right amygdala to conservatism. Image: R. Kanai et al., Current Biology, 21 (26 April 2011) What makes someone a conservative or a liberal? According to this new (and undoubtedly controversial) study, it&#8217;s their brain anatomy: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2011-04/conservative-liberal-brain.jpg" width="500" height="223"><br />Lefty or righty? A new study links a larger anterior cingulate cortex (<em>left</em>) to politically liberal views and a larger right amygdala to conservatism. Image: R. Kanai et al., Current Biology, 21 (26 April 2011)</p>
<p>What makes someone a conservative or a liberal? According to this new (and undoubtedly controversial) study, it&#8217;s their brain anatomy:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Cognitive neuroscientist Ryota Kanai and colleagues at University College London recruited 90 student volunteers and had them rate their political philosophy on a five-point scale ranging from very liberal to very conservative. Then the researchers used magnetic resonance imaging to get a look inside their brains. In a paper published online today in Current Biology, the team reports two main findings: political conservatives tend to have a larger right amygdala, a region involved in detecting threats and responding to fearful stimuli, whereas liberals tend to have a larger anterior cingulate cortex, an area that becomes active in situations involving conflict or uncertainty.</em></p>
<p><em>There was considerable overlap though. When the researchers looked only at the brain scans, Kanai says they could predict who was liberal and who was conservative with about 75% accuracy&#8212;much better than a coin toss but probably not good enough for any high-tech campaign tactics.</em></p>
<p><em>Kanai is at pains to make clear that the findings don&#8217;t mean political views are &quot;hard-wired&quot; into the brain. He acknowledges that the data don&#8217;t prove that these neuroanatomical differences actually cause political differences, but he suspects that they might play a role.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/04/does-your-brain-bleed-red-white-.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/09/conservatives-and-liberals-have-different-brain-anatomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek as a Liberal/Progressive Vision of the Future</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/11/star-trek-as-a-liberalprogressive-vision-of-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/11/star-trek-as-a-liberalprogressive-vision-of-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Westmoreland-White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/11/star-trek-as-a-liberalprogressive-vision-of-the-future/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Westmoreland-White sees the Star Trek universe as a liberal or progressive vision of the future, featuring things such as racial and gender equality, free universal health care, and an absence of imperalism. I&#8217;m neither liberal or progressive, but I think that he&#8217;s right. But I do think that Star Trek is a fairly progressive/liberal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3662/3521489599_27aef8a383.jpg?v=0" class="imageleft" width="150" height="113" />Michael Westmoreland-White sees the Star Trek universe as a liberal or progressive vision of the future, featuring things such as racial and gender equality, free universal health care, and an absence of imperalism.  I&#8217;m neither liberal or progressive, but I think that he&#8217;s right.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>But I do think that Star Trek is a fairly progressive/liberal science fiction franchise.  It’s a basically hopeful vision of the future.  It offers up a future earth that has survived war, terrorism, and ecological disasters and forged a global government of representative democracy (we are never told this, but it must be some form of federalist system to avoid tyranny).  Hunger and poverty have been overcome.  Most diseases have been conquered and high quality universal healthcare is available for all.  Education is free and the world is highly literate with most people going beyond secondary education.  It’s a clean energy society that is eco-friendly. (In Star Trek IV, the Enterprise crew in their stolen Klingon ship actually go back in time  to the 20th C. to keep whales from going extinct–and in the process save the earth of their future.) There is finally global racial harmony.  And, despite the micro-mini-skirted uniforms that reflected the fact that the original series was made in the ’60s, we finally have gender equality, too.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://levellers.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-science-fiction-for-progressives/">Link</a></p>
<p>Image by Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bundabergtim/">Tim Williams</a> used under Creative Commons license</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/11/star-trek-as-a-liberalprogressive-vision-of-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:25:47 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1268 seconds -->
