<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; attraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/attraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Body of Work: Guéguen and the Goad of Small Things</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/09/06/body-of-work-gueguen-and-the-goad-of-small-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/09/06/body-of-work-gueguen-and-the-goad-of-small-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Improbable Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hitchhiking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=52496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Savoring the colorful research of an under-publicized researcher compiled by Alice Shirrell Kaswell and Stephen Drew This issue’s under-publicized scientist is Nicolas Guéguen, who finds significance, or at least fascination, in the goad of small things. He does what might be called voyeuristic microscopy, watching how people react to mundanely noticeable sights and sounds and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Savoring the colorful research of an under-publicized researcher<br />
compiled by Alice Shirrell Kaswell and Stephen Drew</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-52502" title="gueguen1" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/gueguen1.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="208" />This issue’s under-publicized scientist  is <a href="http://nicolas.gueguen.free.fr/" target="_blank">Nicolas Guéguen</a>, who finds significance, or at least fascination, in  the goad of small things. He does what might be called voyeuristic  microscopy, watching how people react to mundanely noticeable sights and  sounds and touching. Many of the experiments involve young female  confederates who are shaped or perfumed or who lay a hand upon strangers  in particular ways. Generally, the test subjects who respond most  vigorously are men.</p>
<p>Based at the University of  Bretagne-Sud, France, Professor Guéguen has been pumping out  publications since the year 2000. He honors the academic custom of  referring to himself, in print, with the royal “we.”</p>
<p>His experiments probe a range of human behavior.</p>
<p>A study called “<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.femininebeauty.info%2Ff%2Fbreasts.size.courtship.pdf&amp;rct=j&amp;q=Women%E2%80%99s%20Bust%20Size%20and%20Men%E2%80%99s%20Courtship%20Solicitation&amp;ei=wEVlTrKrOqTIsQKX-5moCQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNG7UUYaHxfWrh4iF_zvt8J_beUEuw"></a>Women’s Bust Size and Men’s Courtship Solicitation,” <sup>1</sup> describes how Professor Guéguen tested “the effect of a woman’s breast  size on approaches made by males. We hypothesized that an increase in  breast size would be associated with an increase in approaches by men.”  The study ends with an 827-word assertion that “Our hypothesis was  confirmed.”</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-52503" title="498raquel" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/498raquel.png" alt="" width="498" height="324" /></p>
<p>A related experiment produced a study called “Bust Size and Hitchhiking: A Field Study.”<sup>2</sup> There Professor Guéguen reports that “1200 male and female French  motorists were tested in a hitchhiking situation. A 20-year-old female  confederate wore a bra which permitted variation in the size of cup to  vary her breast size. She stood by the side of a road frequented by  hitchhikers and held out her thumb to catch a ride. Increasing the  bra-size of the female hitchhiker was significantly associated with an  increase in number of male drivers, but not female drivers, who stopped  to offer a ride.”<br />
<span id="more-52496"></span><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-52505" title="497hitchhiking" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/497hitchhiking.png" alt="" width="497" height="396" /></p>
<p>An earlier study called “The Effect of Touch on Tipping: An Evaluation in a French Bar,”<sup>3</sup> aimed to fill a very specific gap in psychologists’ knowledge of human  behavior. The study explains: “Although positive effect of touch on  restaurant’s tipping has been widely found in the literature, no  evaluation was made outside the United States of America and in a bar.  An experiment was carried out in a French bar. A waitress briefly  touched (or not) the forearm of a patron when asking him/her what he/she  want to drink. Results show that touch increases tipping behavior  although giving a tip to a waitress in a bar is unusual in France.”  Professor Guéguen has pursued related questions, some involving smiles,  upon which he reports in additional studies.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-52504" title="498tip" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/498tip.png" alt="" width="498" height="326" /></p>
<p>“The Effect of Perfume on Prosocial Behavior of Pedestrians”<sup>4</sup> is representative of several Guéguen investigations of how people  respond to the presence and actions of a heavily perfumed woman. In this  one, the fragranced woman walks in front of strangers and “drops a  packet of paper handkerchiefs or a glove apparently without noticing.”</p>
<p>In these and other forays, Professor Guéguen probes and ponders the human condition.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>1. “Women’s Bust Size and Men’s Courtship Solicitation,” Nicolas Guéguen, <em>Body Image</em>, vol 4, no. 4, December 2007, pp. 386–90. (Thanks to Charles Oppenheim for bringing this to our attention.)</p>
<p>2. “Bust Size and Hitchhiking: A Field Study,” Nicolas Guéguen, <em>Perceptual and Motor Skills</em>, vol. 105, no. 3, part 2, December 2007, pp. 1294–8. (Thanks to James Randerson for bringing this to our attention.):</p>
<p>3. “The Effect of Touch on Tipping: An Evaluation in a French Bar,” Nicolas Guéguen and Celine Jacob, <em>International Journal of Hospitality Management,</em> vol. 24, no. 2, 2005, pp. 295–9.</p>
<p>4. “The Effect of Perfume on Prosocial Behavior of Pedestrians,” Nicolas Guéguen, <em>Psychological Reports,</em> vol. 88, 2001, pp. 1046-8.</p>
<p>“Hitchhikers’ Smiles and Receipt of Help,” N. Guéguen and J. Fischer-Lokou, <em>Psychological Reports,</em> vol. 94, no. 3, June 2004, pp. 756–60. Investigators at the Universite de Bretagne-Sud, Vannes, France found that:</p>
<p>The positive association of smiling on  helping behavior is well established in social psychology. Nevertheless,  no study was found for the effect of smiling on hitchhiking success. An  experiment was carried out in France where hitchhiking is a legal and  common practice. Four confederates, 2 young men and 2 young women,  selected for their “average attractiveness” hitchhiked, signaled to 800  (503 men and 297 women) motorists driving along the road on a peninsula.  In half of the cases, the confederate smiled at the motorist. Analysis  showed that, when hitchhiking women were smiling, motorists stopped more  frequently but not when hitchhikers were men. Also, in all conditions,  motorists who stopped were male.</p>
<p>Professor Guéguen’s fine-grained  investigation of men’s response to particular aspects of women’s  appearance and behavior also includes “The Effects of Women’s Cosmetics  on Men’s Courtship Behavior,” N. Guéguen, <em>North American Journal of Psychology,</em> vol. 10, no. 1, 2008, pp. 221–8.</p>
<p>Professor Guéguen’s several  tipping-related studies includes “The Effect of a Joke on Tipping When  It Is Delivered at the Same Time as the Bill,” N. Guéguen, <em>Journal of Applied Social Psychology,</em> vol. 32, 2002, pp. 1955–63.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-52506" title="371barbill" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/371barbill.png" alt="" width="297" height="241" />Early in his career, Professor Guéguen  mounted this multi-disciplinary look at tipping: “Effect on Tipping of  Barman Drawing a Sun on the Bottom of Customers’ Checks,” Nicolas  Guéguen and Patrick Legoherel, <em>Psychological Reports,</em> vol. 87, no. 1, August 2000, pp. 223-6. The authors explain that they:</p>
<p>Investigated whether a drawing of the  sun on a restaurant bill increases the number of tips left by clients.  The experiment was carried out in bars and involved 177 clients who had  ordered an espresso coffee. Analysis shows that the drawing of the sun  led clients to leave a tip more frequently than when this drawing was  not present. The size of the tip left was also higher. The hypothesis of  the creation of a positive frame of mind by this stimulus is discussed.</p>
<p>Professor Guéguen’s fine-grained  investigation of men’s response to particular aspects of women’s  appearance and behavior include “Women’s Eye Contact and Men’s Later  Interest: Two Field Experiments,” N. Guéguen, J. Fischer-Lokou, L.  Lefebvre, and L. Lamy, <em>Perceptual and Motor Skills,</em> vol. 106, 2008, pp. 63–6.</p>
<p>Professor Guéguen also researches the  effects of ambient music on how much people drink, He has received  considerable attention for this study: “Sound Level of Environmental  Music and Drinking Behavior: A Field Experiment with Beer Drinkers,” N.  Guéguen, C. Jacob, T. Morineau. H. Le Guellec, and M. Lourel, <em>Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, </em>vol. 32, no. 10, October 2008, pp. 1795–8.</p>
<p>Professor Guéguen’s “Sound Level of  Environmental Music and Drinking Behavior: A Field Experiment with Beer  Drinkers “is a follow-up, in some ways, to this earlier study: “Sound  Level of Background Music and Alcohol Consumption: An Empirical  Evaluation,” N. Guéguen, H. Le Guellec, and C. Jacob, <em>Perceptual and Motor Skills,</em> vol. 99, no. 1, August 2004, pp. 34–8.</p>
<p>Professor Guéguen’s music-and-alcohol studies are by no means his  only angle of attack on the general subject of ambient music’s effect on  behavior. He was also the driving force behind this study: “Cartoon  Music in a Candy Store: A Field Experiment,” H. Le Guellec, N. Guéguen,  C. Jacob, and A. Pascual, <em>Psychological Reports,</em> vol. 100, 2007, pp. 1255–8.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">(Image captioning via <a href="http://en.speechable.com/" target="_blank">Speechable</a>)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">__________________________</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-52501" title="AIRcover8888" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/AIRcover8888-150x196.png" alt="" width="150" height="196" />This <a href="http://improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume15/v15i2/v15i2.html#BodyofWork" target="_blank">article</a> is republished with permission from the <a href="http://improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume15/v15i2/v15i2.html" target="_blank">March-April 2009 issue</a> of the <em>Annals of Improbable Research</em>. You can download or purchase <a href="http://improbable.com/magazine/" target="_blank">back issues of the magazine</a>, or <a href="http://improbable.com/subscribe/" target="_blank">subscribe</a> to receive future issues. Or get a subscription for someone as a gift!</p>
<p>Visit their <a href="http://improbable.com/" target="_blank">website</a> for more research that makes people LAUGH and then THINK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/09/06/body-of-work-gueguen-and-the-goad-of-small-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Face vs. Body</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/02/face-vs-body/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/02/face-vs-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=25944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been many studies about what body part attracts the opposite sex, but few studies that compare the importance of body parts to each other. A new study suggests that people assign more importance to faces than bodies when they are looking for a long-term relationship. For a potential short-term relationship, men assigned slightly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imageleft" src="http://static.neatorama.com/misscellania/150BodyOrFace.jpg" alt="" />There have been many studies about what body part attracts the opposite sex, but few studies that compare the importance of body parts to each other. A new study suggests that people assign more importance to faces than bodies when they are looking for a long-term relationship. For a potential short-term relationship, men assigned slightly more importance to the appearance of a woman’s body, while women cared more about a man’s face.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Statistical analysis of men rating women indicated that, even though both the body and face ratings were significant positive predictors of the ratings given to the combined images, the face ratings were stronger predictors of the combined ratings. It was also observed that the ratings for combined images was slightly higher for short term relationships as compared to long term relationships. One other significant observation – when the short term and long term relationship data were analyzed separately, the body ratings stood as more significant predictors to the combined ratings than face ratings, for short term relationships. In the case of females rating men, similar to men – the body and face ratings were both significant predictors with the face ratings being very strong predictors as compared to the body ratings. However, females ratings for men did not show any difference under the short term and long term decisions.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This only makes sense, as we tend to cover our bodies most of the time, but you have to look at that face a lot. <a href="http://www.scitechbits.com/2009/08/31/what-makes-them-hot-body-or-face/" target="_blank">Link</a> -via <a href="http://digg.com/" target="_blank">Digg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/02/face-vs-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rating Attractiveness: Consensus Among Men, Not Women</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/27/rating-attractiveness-consensus-among-men-not-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/27/rating-attractiveness-consensus-among-men-not-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s another case of science proving what we all knew in the back of our minds. Men pretty much agree on what makes a woman attractive, while women have their own ideas about what is attractive in men. A survey led by Wake Forest University psychologist Dustin Wood showed pictures of people to 4,000 adults [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/misscellania/150ogling.png" class="imageleft" />Here&#8217;s another case of science proving what we all knew in the back of our minds. Men pretty much agree on what makes a woman attractive, while women have their own ideas about what is attractive in men. A survey led by Wake Forest University psychologist Dustin Wood showed pictures of people to 4,000 adults of all ages, and had them rate the photographs for attractiveness on a scale of one to ten. </p>
<blockquote><p><em>Men&#8217;s judgments of women&#8217;s attractiveness were based primarily around physical features and they rated highly those who looked thin and seductive. Most of the men in the study also rated photographs of women who looked confident as more attractive.</p>
<p>As a group, the women rating men showed some preference for thin, muscular subjects, but disagreed on how attractive many men in the study were. Some women gave high attractiveness ratings to the men other women said were not attractive at all.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm">Link</a> -via <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a></p>
<p>(image credit: Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/22673148@N02/3618976573/">mod as hell</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/27/rating-attractiveness-consensus-among-men-not-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:19:37 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.2306 seconds -->
