Jonathan Archer, Badass

By John Farrier in Science Fiction, Star Trek on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:20 am


I’m just now watching through the run of the Star Trek television series Enterprise and OMG Jonathan Archer is my new favorite captain! Spoilers below the jump….

So far, he’s (season 3, episode 23):

  • Created a sentient clone in order to harvest his organs so that his chief engineer can live.
  • Committed overt piracy against an innocent vessel in order to get a warp coil.
  • Ordered Hoshi revived from a coma even though it will probably kill her.
  • And he’s done all of these things because he has to save Earth from destruction. You can bet Jean-Luc Picard would have gotten his panties in a twist about all of these moral dilemmas, but not Archer. He knows what has to be done and doesn’t let anything get in the way. Archer’s the man you call when a problem’s gotta be solved.

    If he engages in similar acts of awesomeness after season 3, episode 23, don’t tell me in the comments. I want to be surprised.

    Image: Paramount


    Email This Post
    Tweet This Post 
    Share This Post on Facebook

    Tags:


    Bestsellers from the NeatoShop:


    1. Johnny Cat
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 3:32 am

      Why did I stop watching that show? I think it had to do with my girlfriend (now ex) crushing on Archer, and not for the reasons you mentioned.

    2. Jjannie
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 9:53 am

      I’m a trek fan since the original series started. I didn’t watch Enterprise as much as I would have liked because it became more about war and sex in space and less about good storytelling and sci-fi. The same went for DS9. But in rerun it’s easier for me to pick and choose which episodes appeal.

    3. John Farrier
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 1:08 pm

      @Johnny Cat — the object of a girl’s crush can be a good indicator of what she’s looking for in a man.

      @Jjannie — the sex in Enterprise is pretty heavy-handed and contrived. But I like the grand, serialized war depicted in it, as well as the Dominion War in DS9. I found the latter rather tedious until the Dominion invasion.

    4. JoeyJoeJoe
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 1:26 pm

      Dude, are you freaking serious? Being a long-time Trek fan, it’s my opinion that Enterprise was nothing more than an abomination.

      Forgetting the fact the Trek timeline had been pretty established and that we had NEVER heard of the NX-01 until this series, the lazy writers and producers decided to fall back on the overused plot device of time travel, so they could side-step any established continuity.

      Now, let me just say that I like Scott Bakula. His work in Quantum Leap was just spectacular (There’s a series on DVD you should buy and watch). However, I never felt that he was “captain” material. I dunno, he just never seemed to gel with me.

      You’re too far along in the series for me to tell you to bother to quit watching, so go ahead and finish it off, and then forget everything that you ever saw.

      Sorry to sound so harsh, but Enterprise was a horrible, lazy and terribly-written entry into the world of Trek. Considering that all other modern ST series lasted for 7 seasons (even Voyager, for god’s sake), there’s a reason that Enterprise was CANCELLED after 4 seasons. Think about it – when you have a cash cow like Star Trek, with millions of built-in fans ready to watch every episode, you need to work pretty hard to screw that up. They succeeded in doing so.

      Do yourself a favor, buy the DVD sets for Babylon 5, Battlestar Galactica or Quantum Leap and cleanse your palette.

    5. Gordon Daily
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 1:34 pm

      My misgivings about Enterprise was that it turned into a soap opera. Season 3 became one long seralized story. ST:TOS and ST:TNG episodes were all stand-alone stories (two-part stories episodes notwithstanding). Also, when Enterprise went into this never-ending story, they lost all sense of humor. The first two seasons were peppered with light-hearted stories, or at least stories where some comic relief was inserted.

      Since the author hasn’t completed Season 3 yet, I’ll forego my comments that would tip him off to events of Season 4, but in my mind, the show continued to go downhill. No wonder it didn’t return for a fifth season.

    6. John Farrier
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

      @Gordon Daily — it’s the serialized, hard-edged tone to Enterprise (and the later seasons of DS9) that I really enjoyed. I like long, involved story arcs. I admit that TNG’s “Rascals” is a guilty pleasure of mine, but I think that constant space comedy would get tiresome.

    7. John Farrier
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 2:02 pm

      @JoeyJoeJoe — I didn’t care for the Borg discontinuity in Enterprise, but in general, the writers were fairly respectful of the timeline. And that had to become difficult.

      The only other major repeated discontinuity that comes to mind is the “Target their engines” wussiness that is a holdover from TNG’s humanitarian vision of war and beyond the technical ability of TOS. It’s the “shoot him in the leg!” mentality of cinema that gets really impractical.

      I’ve watched all of Babylon 5 and loved it. It’s arguably the best science fiction show ever produced. I’ve watched the first 1.5 seasons of Battlestar Galactica and will get back to it.

    8. Elnots
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 2:48 pm

      Best Star Trek spin-off series, ever. > DS9 (minus dominion war, that shit was pimp) Voyager, TNG

    9. JoeyJoeJoe
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

      @John Farrier — I don’t agree that the writers were respectful of the timeline. (I’m going to get really geeky here, so just bear with me…)

      In the TNG episode, A Matter of Time, it’s clearly stated that there were no phasers in the 22nd century (Archer’s time period). Sure enough, what did we see in Enterprise? Phasers.

      The lineage of all starships named Enterprise has been very explicitly spelled out since the Star Trek movies. The Enterprise D and E had little models of all those ships (including the sailing vessel, the aricraft carrier and the Space Shuttle) in their observation lounges. The NX-01 never graces those walls. They invented this ship simply for the series and never bothered to explain where it came from.

      Picard once stated that “first contact with the Klingons was disastrous and led to decades of war.” We saw that first contact on the ENT premiere, but where was the war?

      In the 22nd century, the Federation was also at war with the Romulan empire. Where was that?

      Also, take a look at the Daedalus class of starships – the class that was meant to follow that of the NX Enterprise. Does the Daedalus class look like it’s a design improvement? I knew that it was going to be a production design challenge to make the tech in this series seem less advanced than the cheesy 1960′s sets, but they missed the mark on this too.

      The writers had a number of pre-set historical events to deal with and they ignored nearly all of them. If you’re going to play in this universe, please respect the canon that has already been established.

      Nevertheless, I AM glad that you’re enjoying the series and I appreciate your thoughtful responses to this comments thread. Enterprise is such a sore spot for me, though. I could talk about this for hours over a couple of Romulan Ales.

    10. Cmdr. Tucker
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 3:37 pm

      Enterprise was my favourite of the new Star Trek series. If you ask me, it was the series where they got everything right: costumes, set design, compelling stories, special effects.

      And I certainly agree about Archer being a badass, since he spends much of the first season as a naive, “gee whiz, we’re new to the neighborhood, we’d sure like to have you over for a coffee some time” guy when it comes to dealing with aliens. In season 3, when Earth is threatened with destruction by the Xindi, his character completely changes. Wait until you see the final episode of season 3!

      I don’t understand why some people moan about how “they messed with the Star Trek timeline”. Um – they’re the Star Trek producers, they’re allowed to do that!

      Enterprise was a breath of fresh air for the franchise, and it’s a shame that so many fans were dismissive of the series.

    11. JoeyJoeJoe
      Aug 9th, 2010 at 4:45 pm

      Just for laughs, take a look at this:

      http://www.firsttvdrama.com/enterprise/

      These are funny, snarky and smart episode by episode reviews of ST:ENT. The guy stopped reviewing on a regular basis around the third season because he really wasn’t inspired to watch anymore.

    12. Brian
      Aug 10th, 2010 at 2:00 am

      So just think of it as “Enterprise” being historical fiction in the Star Trek universe. This story arch is based on an oral tradition in the ST universe and has nothing to do with the “reality” of historical events. Since suspension of disbelief is required to enjoy ANY sci fi story, let’s make a fictional leap and go with the writers prerogative to come up with something new. I always liked this series (this post inspired me to find it on Hulu and watch it for the second time).

    13. AaronA1C
      Aug 10th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

      I’m totally with you Brian. DS9 & Voyager were sometimes encumbered with having to remember what happened 10 years ago on an episode of TNG. Enterprise was able to just kind of cruise without worrying about having to make every single thing historically accurate. And if in doubt, just say the timeline got screwed up by the baddies somehow, and exactly how it got screwed up wasn’t shown in an episode.

      (Time-travellers also seem to explain the gigantic Enterprise ship in the new movie. Seriously, engineering was filmed in a brewery. It’s HUGE! Which is awesome, historical accuracy be damned.)

      One more thing…would you really trust Rick Berman’s crew to do a good historically-accurate series pre-dating the Original 1960′s series? They would have just mooked it up. True, the two-parter in the mirror universe was awesome, but I don’t think they could have pulled it off for an entire series. It was better to give them something they could pull off with some success: a futuristic-to-2000 throwback show.

      (Afterword: I’ve seen every single episode of TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT, and the movies. And I love Enterprise.)

      Dang, now I gotta watch that mirror universe two parter again!

    14. Mortaryan
      Aug 28th, 2010 at 5:56 pm

      OK. I’m a Long time Trek Fan…I gave Enterprise a chance in the beginning…and it failed, or more Berman and Braga failed Gene Roddenberry and both the original and potential new the Star Trek fans miserably.

      Though I did return to it at the end, and it was immensely better in the last year than the first year (wholly crap T’Pol’s wig looked a million times better), the whole Xindi thing just sucked badly, and the way it was resolved was just impotently unimaginative.

      Oops, sorry we killed 7 million people on your planet, but we’re glad you cleared up that sphere thing for us, YAY!

      Enterprise was NOT “Star Trek,” it was “Enterprise.”

      Enterprise, although placed in the same fictional world, was about the first warp 4 “EARTH” Star Ship, and it’s deep space exploration missions.

      Remember other ships, even freighter class ships had warp 2 capabilities – what did they only build one or two of each class of ship?! Not likely…this is earth were talking about…

      In the original TOS Technical Manual – with the constitution class there were 20 main/flag ships (presumably for all the sectors/quadrants of space), and the A FULL PAGE listing ships names and their registration numbers…There should have been at least 20 warp 2 (overhauled and upgraded?!?!) Earth ships to face off against the Xindi Weapons – let alone Earth’s Vulcan Allies?!?!

      Ummm…something was really a miss in that plot line.

      Anyway…I was looking forward to the war with the Romulans, but when they were not even spoken about, I knew Berman and Braga had blown it.

      Brandon and Braga had a real opportunity to make a long time race THEIR series arch villain, and to expand and build on and amazing rich culture, and to create real plot conflicts with the Vulcans…but I guess they weren’t Borgy enough…they were to…human?

      Interesting with what western civilization is facing right now, if they had put a religious face on the Romulans they could have used that to say a lot.

      With each successive Star Trek show Rick Berman ran the Star Trek franchise into the ground and then introducing the pessimistic nihilist Braga as executive producer into the newest “Non-Trek” Star Trek didn’t help one bit, neither of them ever got Roddenberry’s vision of hopeful optimism in the future.

      I am tired of these no talent desk jockeys who want to make a name for themselves and in the process destroy an already well established deep rich mythology of Star Trek.

      And while I love J.J. Abrams as a director he has sucume to the decoys of flash pomp and Cameron Circumstance.

      His version of Star Trek was like an order of bad Chinese food, a 1/2 hour later, the garlic is repeating on you even though you couldn’t swear to what it was that you ate and indigestion aside were hungry all over again.

      There was no substance (side stepping any faithfulness to the mythology – through the “alternate time line” claim), leaving the audience dazzled dazed and confused by special effects…yes, there were some great performance.

      Simon Pegg was great, Urban amazingly hit the mark and made McCoy his own, Seldana was sweet cheese cake, Ben Cross was an amazing Sarek and what little of Ryder as Amanda was good…but she’s dead, so no more Ryder, but watching Quinto’s Moe wig flap in the wind as he ran around was pitifully hilarious, and I kept waiting for Sulu and Checkov to start chanting Belly bombers.

      Enterprise…well there were a few redeeming shows, the Vulcan plot lines kicked ass…especially finding the Kir’Shara and finding Sarak’s Ka (although it being transfered to Archer was a little hoe-key)…had they stuck with the established mythology, we could have learned more about the Romulans – maybe giving them their own “religious” prophet of “war.”

      Well can’t dwell on the could haves.


    Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

    Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | Science T-Shirts

    Lijit Search
    Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page