Digg: A Cautionary Tale for Web 2.0 Companies?

Redesigns are fraught with potential problems, but it seems that the implosion of Digg after its latest redesign serves as a particularly striking guide of what NOT to do.

Daniel Lyons of Newsweek wrote an interesting article about how Digg is a cautionary tale for Web 2.0 companies:

Digg’s collapse has become a cautionary tale for so-called Web 2.0 companies in Silicon Valley, even the current crop of superstars, like Facebook and Twitter. The basic problem is that these new-media companies don’t really have customers; they have audiences. Starting a company like Digg is less like building a traditional tech company (think Apple or HP) and more like launching a TV show. And perhaps, like TV shows, these companies are ephemeral in nature. People flock in for a while, then get bored and move on. [...]

But Digg’s traffic had begun to slide even before the bad redesign, due to a much larger problem: Twitter. That site started out as a way to let people blast out 140-character posts, but has evolved into a way for people to pass along links to news items they find interesting. Williams insists that Twitter and Digg perform completely different tasks.

That’s true. They are different. But this is how disruption happens in tech. It’s hardly ever about direct competition. Rather, something comes out of left field and provides a new way to do something. There have been plenty of Digg clones, but none of them ever hurt Digg very much. And nobody could have predicted that Twitter would take the place of Digg—not even the guys who created Twitter. And, if history is a guide, Twitter itself will be disrupted by something equally impossible to predict. This is why Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg said at a conference a few months ago that “the biggest competitor for us is someone we haven’t heard of.”

Link


Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

I used to use digg quite a bit until I came back from vacation to find digg v4.0.

It's difficult to describe, but the front page just seemed crappy and filled with pseudo-advertisements. The comment sections were dead as well, which made it even more boring.

On the plus side, I check Neatorama out more than I used to. :)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Yeah, like Ali, Digg was one of the handful of sites I went to every day.

Then it seemed to be a chore to go through it, then the 4.0 update essentially chased me away like stray cats outside a dumpster. Something about demanding me to follow people or something. I deleted the bookmark and that was it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Ali S. - reddit's algo is not transparent, and there are power users on reddit. Editors/sub-reddit admins wield tremendous power on the site.

Reddit's downfall will be its popularity - the quality of comments there have declined significantly since the early days (it's now filled with the "derp, derp" crowd - witty, but ultimately just a hipster fest).

Metafilter continue to be my favorite on the web.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Commenting is closed.





Check out Twaggies' very funny clip:

Om Nom - Twaggies by Twaggies
Email This Post to a Friend
"Digg: A Cautionary Tale for Web 2.0 Companies?"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window