The Robopocalypse Approaches: Robots Learn to Lie

Posted by John Farrier in Science & Tech on August 20, 2009 at 4:18 pm


Researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne programmed robots to move around an area, looking for particular rings designated as food, and avoid others designated as poison. Whenever they found food, they were programmed to flash a light. This light attracted the other robots, leading them toward the food source. When the program was altered to give the robots a measure of autonomy, they gradually ceased to flash their lights and alert their competitors that they had found food. Here’s the abstract of the journal article:

Reliable information is a crucial factor influencing decision-making, and thus fitness in all animals. A common source of information comes from inadvertent cues produced by the behavior of conspecifics. Here we use a system of experimental evolution with robots foraging in an arena containing a food source to study how communication strategies can evolve to regulate information provided by such cues. Robots could produce information by emitting blue light, which other robots could perceive with their cameras. Over the first few generations, robots quickly evolved to successfully locate the food, while emitting light randomly. This resulted in a high intensity of light near food, which provided social information allowing other robots to more rapidly find the food. Because robots were competing for food, they were quickly selected to conceal this information. However, they never completely ceased to produce information. Detailed analyses revealed that this somewhat surprising result was due to the strength of selection in suppressing information declining concomitantly with the reduction in information content. Accordingly, a stable equilibrium with low information and considerable variation in communicative behaviors was attained by mutation-selection. Because a similar co-evolutionary process should be common in natural systems, this may explain why communicative strategies are so variable in many animal species.

Although not directly related to the flesh-eating robot program, I’m sure that robots able to use humans for fuel would prefer to lie about their intentions.

Link via OhGizmo!


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post

Tags: , , ,


FUN PRODUCTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP:
BuckyBalls (w/ Mystery Bonus!)


COMMENT

6 comments to "The Robopocalypse Approaches: Robots Learn to Lie"

  1. MadMolecule
    August 20th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    That's rather chilling.

  2. carl
    August 20th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    "a measure of autonomy"

    No, not really. It's still just a program written by programmers. They told it to sometimes not alert the other robots, and it clocked that there was more food available.

    They're not telling lies.

  3. Christophe
    August 20th, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going.

  4. rintrah
    August 20th, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    "No, not really. It’s still just a program written by programmers. They told it to sometimes not alert the other robots, and it clocked that there was more food available.

    They’re not telling lies."

    ^This.

    I'm dubious that this is anything more than a sock puppet show between programmers. Any program still necessarily reflects the intent of the programmer. When a programmer arrives at a solution to a problem that its programmer didn't specifically foresee, *then* I'll be impressed. Until then - at ease. Singularity averted.

  5. Video Game Dork
    August 22nd, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    I'll have to with the others above. AI it really just trickery - making robat seem like they are 'thinking' to (some) humans - and this doesn't change that.

  6. carl
    August 23rd, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    Rintrah, I completely agree (especially since you were originally agreeing with me). Their justification comes in that they can make some neat headlines, thus ensuring future grant dollars. Perhaps this is a necessary step towards actual AI (not that I think we should bother) but for heck's sake, why is the media so obsessed with these easily digestible "I knew it!" headlines?!


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS