Ain't No Mountain High Enough: Comparative Heights of Mountains and Lengths of Rivers

Posted by Alex in Book & Lit on October 19, 2008 at 10:41 am



Title: A comparative view of the lengths of the principal rivers of Scotland (with comparative view of the height of the falls of Foyers and Corra Linn), John Thomoson’s Atlas of Scotland (1831)

BibliOdyssey blog has a really neat post about ye olden books that are all about comparative heights of mountains and lengths of rivers. The pictures are worth a thousand words, so thankfully, large pics are just a click away:

In what must have been something of a eureka moment of innovation, the originator of the comparative map (rivers, mountains, lakes, islands, continents &c.) presentation style perfectly captured the common ground between science, graphic design and education. It’s equally possible to imagine a geographer, artist or teacher having conjured up the idea for such a novel means of data visualisation.

Link

All I could think about when I perused the large pics is this: "Ain’t no mountain high enough… Ain’t no valley low enough… Ain’t no river wide enough…"


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post


FUN PRODUCTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP:


COMMENT

One comment to "Ain't No Mountain High Enough: Comparative Heights of Mountains and Lengths of Rivers"

  1. Ali S.
    October 20th, 2008 at 7:56 pm

    Weird coincidence. I had this song "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" stuck in my head all day.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS