The Miller-Urey Experiment Revisited

By Alex in Science & Tech on Oct 18, 2008 at 11:43 am

Almost six decades ago, when Stanley Miller was just a 22-year-old PhD student, he and his professor Harold Urey did an experiment that became legendary in science: Miller mixed basic chemicals that were present in primordial earth and added electric sparks to stimulate a thunderstorm. The result? Miller found traces of amino acids – the building blocks of proteins.

After Miller died last year, his former student found a (scientific) treasure trove: the vials containing dried samples from his groundbreaking 1950s experiment. And when they tested the samples using today’s more sophisticated equipments, they found a lot more stuff:

"We found not only did these make more of certain amino acids than in the classic experiment, but they made a greater diversity of amino acids."

Miller, using the old methods, had found five amino acids; Jeffrey Bada and his teams tracked down 22. What is more, the overall chemical yields were often higher than in the first set of experiments – the mixture appeared to be more fertile.

Professor Bada points out that today, almost all volcanic eruptions are accompanied by violent electric storms. The same could have been true on the young Earth. "What we suggest is that volcanoes belched out gases just like the ones Stanley had used, and were immediately subjected to intense volcanic lightning.

"And so each one of those volcanoes could have been a little, local prebiotic factory. And so all of that went into making the material that we refer to as the prebiotic soup."

Link


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Ali S.
    Oct 18th, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    I remember reading a report about this in National Geographic magazine. It was truely fascinating.

  2. Edward
    Oct 18th, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    They are not reproducing the experiment? Just testing stuff that has sat around for years? While interesting, I do not think this passes as science.

  3. su.wei
    Oct 18th, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    sure it passes as science! but they need to reproduce the experiment. something im sure they’re going to do.

    soooper exciting. :)

  4. issacsullivan
    Oct 18th, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    I bet there would be lots of lifeforms on anything I packed away for 30 years.

  5. Tempscire
    Oct 19th, 2008 at 4:07 am

    They didn’t even clean out the tubes before packing them up? :p

  6. volcanogodless
    Oct 19th, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    While a fascinating experiment, it has since been proven that the primordial Earth’s atmosphere was CO2 and repetition of the Miller-Urey experiment under these conditions yielded no results. :(

    back to the drawing board….

  7. Desdenova
    Nov 3rd, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    The creationist claim that an oxygen rich atmosphere invalidates Miller’s evidence for abiogenesis is based on a ( likely intentional ) misreading of a 2004 paper titled ” U-rich Archaean sea-floor sediments from Greenland – indications of >3700 Ma oxygenic photosynthesis. ”

    The paper discusses the transportation of uranium through oxygen rich water 3.7 billion years ago, indicating that photosynthetic organisms existed some 200 million years earlier than previously believed. Instead of invalidating the experiment, the paper only pushes the origin of life back a little, geologically speaking.

    Lacking valid peer reviewed alternatives, the creationist community simply relied on one of their usual tactics, misrepresentation, to create yet another straw man in their unflagging efforts to discredit the truth of evolution.

    Back to the drawing board for the creationists.

  8. Eagle1600
    Feb 13th, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    deep sea hyrdothermal vents would actually inhibit life formation. Experiments show that amino acids could form in these vents but only have a a half life of a few minutes – some sugars last only a few seconds. No RNA/DNA, peptide formation – and, worse, ammonia can not exist in levels necessary for life in these vents. What characteristics of these vents that would allow life – also destroys life. Schoonen, Xu – Astrobiology 1, (2001) pg 122-123.

  9. Eagle1600
    Feb 13th, 2009 at 11:14 pm

    Miller Urey experiment ignored many conditions in the atmosphere that would breakdown the chemical synthesis they did achieve e.g. cytosine – has no chemical pathway during earth’s primordial past, the gases Miller relies upon – consume the chemicals that create this necessary component of nucleic acids. Ribose, phosphate compounds also create problems in Miller’s scenario.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page