Facial Symmetry = Beauty = Good Genes?



It’s long been known that an attractive face is highly symmetric - but now, Anthony Little of the University of Stirling, Scotland, and colleagues have gone one step further: they are attractive because they advertise genetic quality or fertility.

Using mug shots of Europeans, the Hadza of Tanzania, one of the last hunter gatherer cultures, and macaque monkeys, measurements were made and people were asked to judge the masculinity of the most and least symmetric pictures.

Whether a member of a troop or a tribe, symmetric males had more masculine facial proportions and symmetric females had more feminine facial proportions.

"In humans, if you look at female models, for example, they tend to be pretty symmetric and at the extremes of femininity," Dr Little says.

He adds "One good face trait deserves another - symmetric men and women appear to have other good face traits".

The findings back the claim that the masculinity/femininity of faces is linked with symmetry and hence advertise quality, that is good genes.

Biological quality can mean many things but as symmetry and femininity/masculinity arise during development then one explanation for the findings is that "both traits could advertise quality in terms of resistance to disease, or environmental stresses and that might mean people with these traits are healthier and live longer," says Dr Little.

Link


Previous Post
Get Neatorama by RSS or email
Next Post
this post? Please email a friend  +reddit  +SU 
Posted on May 10, 2008 at 9:02 am by Alex
Category: Science & Tech

From our new online store:
» More fun T-shirt designs at Neatorama Online Store

14 comments to "Facial Symmetry = Beauty = Good Genes?"

  • jf
    May 10th, 2008 at 10:50 am

    this isn’t a new finding at all! scientists have known this for decades, im pretty sure…it’s interesting, for sure, but nowhere near groundbreaking

  • Carl
    May 10th, 2008 at 10:55 am

    Naw, there was a study a few years ago, I’m sure, about how ASYMMETRICAL faces were handsome. On men anyway - maybe it doesn’t work for women. The article featured, oh what’s his name. Man, it was some musician who looked kind of like Kramer with blonder hair. Anyway, super asymmetrical face.

    What it came down to was those people had character, were distinguished, unique.

    I think it’s just being one extreme or another. Either being perfectly symmetrical, or really uniquely asymmetrical. I mean look at Clint Eastwood’s sneer! Very asymmetrical, but girls love the guy.

    And the genes thing is already on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_symmetry
    “Animal studies show that diseased mothers give birth to offspring that show greater asymmetries.”

  • Vako
    May 10th, 2008 at 11:07 am

    Eugenics a-Go-Go !!!

    :-P

  • Worlds Most Beautiful Woman
    May 10th, 2008 at 11:28 am

    http://www.intmath.com/Numbers/mathOfBeauty.php

    Heres another take on solving this eternal mystery.

    Also analyze the women on my site.

  • ted
    May 10th, 2008 at 11:32 am

    “No one disputes that symmetrical faces, such as that of Kate Moss, are more attractive.”

    That’s kind of a big leap to say that nobody disputes that. How I love pseudo-science.

  • Alex
    May 10th, 2008 at 11:34 am

    @jf, the first part of the equation yes (symmetry = beauty). But not the second part (beauty = good genes or fertility), that’s new.

  • Carl
    May 10th, 2008 at 11:47 am

    Lyle Lovett was the guy I was trying to remember in the first post. All I could think of for a while was Guy Ritchie.

  • AJ
    May 10th, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    Umm, not everyone equates masculinity or femininity with attractiveness. Those words would have me picking out people who fit societal stereotypes for those words, not people I consider attractive.

  • L
    May 10th, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    I don’t know if beauty = fertility. What about ugly women who go and have 15 kids?

  • Ali S.
    May 10th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    @ L

    I was just about to mention that! :)

  • Diogenes doo doo
    May 10th, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    NOW I know what all the broken mirrors meant and to think Ive been vain for all these years. Well, now that I am past my prime and just know learning that my asymetric face is equal to mother nature taking a crap, the rest of life for me should be bliss.
    thanks a lot ” Anthony Little of the University of Stirling, Scotland, and colleagues”, if that’s your real name.

  • Jess
    May 11th, 2008 at 1:49 am

    Alex - scientists have also known for decades that beauty = good genes and fertility.

    L - a large part of what we consider “beauty” is youth. Even is a face is not all that attractive, if it’s young, the person will be more fertile.
    Other symbols of fertility/health in areas other than the face (in women) include a low waist/hip ratio, healthy weight, full breasts, and shiny hair.

    Carl - Attractiveness in males is not as important, as status and fidelity is considered just as (or even more) desirable than genes by women. Maybe that’s why asymmetrical male faces could be considered more attractive than asymmetrical female faces.

    This is the evolutionary psychology perspective. Keep in mind that it focuses on the species as a whole rather than specific individuals.

  • Jason E.
    May 12th, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    Search:

    “The Golden Ratio”
    “Phi”
    and
    1: 1.618

  • Jason E.
    May 12th, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    The symmetry is due to the tendency of growing things to aspire to grow such that it’s proportions correlate to a ratio of 1:1.618. If this number looks familiar, it’s called the “golden ratio” Makes sense that growing in a way that yields the highest correlation to the way that things “want” to grow would be perceived, as the most healthy… and therefore the most desirable.

    Use your favorite search engine to do some research on the golden ratio and the beauty ratio.


Want your own avatar? Get one for free at Gravatar!



Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. We don't censor comment based on your point of view but comments that are abusive, use excessive profanity, or contain off-topic links may get edited or deleted. On some posts, it may take up several minutes for you comment to show up.


Stay updated on the comments in this post with Comment RSS