I For One Welcome Our Comb Jelly ... Ancestor?

Posted by Alex in Animal, Science & Tech on March 6, 2008 at 2:34 am


Ladies and gentlemen, meet your ancestor – in fact the ancestor of all animal life on Earth – the comb jelly.

Biologist Casey Dunn of Brown University and colleagues used DNA data from various species to determine that the comb jelly (Ctenophore), which emerged some 600 million years ago, is our true ancient ancestor:

Textbook knowledge says that sponges were the first cab off the rank when multicellular life began to diversify. Our study shows comb jellies, which have well-developed tissues and a nervous system, branched off from other animals even before the lowly sponge (which don’t have any tissues or nerve cells). This radically changes our understanding of one of the most fundamental steps on the path to modern animals."

If comb jellies branch first, as the new tree shows, then either sponges aren’t as primitively simple they seemed (new hypothesis: they could have simplified later) or else comb jellies evolved a complex body plan separately from the rest of us.’

Link


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post


FUN PRODUCTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP:


COMMENT

13 comments to "I For One Welcome Our Comb Jelly ... Ancestor?"

  1. Founderstar
    March 6th, 2008 at 7:15 am

    Hard to actually believe...but if science can prove so (that they are our actual ancestors), then yea i quite believe it.
    TY for the article anyway!

  2. nick
    March 6th, 2008 at 8:16 am

    so like, aliens then.

  3. Sid Morrison
    March 6th, 2008 at 8:41 am

    I chuckle how some people are really persnickity about calling jellyfish "jellies" now. I was at an aquarium a couple years ago and I think one of the docents must have spent her entire day self-righteously correcting kids pointing to "jellyfish" and "starfish" telling them they are "jellies" and "sea stars". Yeah, everyone knows they aren't really fish -- I don't think people were ever too confused. Well guess what? They aren't made of freaking jelly or stars either!

  4. l'elk!
    March 6th, 2008 at 10:57 am

    hi grandpapa i love you :)

  5. NiteWhite
    March 6th, 2008 at 12:50 pm

    so wait, you're telling me we're not descendants of incest between Adam and Steve? my whole worldview was just shattered!

    ;-P

  6. NiteWhite
    March 6th, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    why wont my comments show up?!

  7. Jeremy
    March 6th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    What a joke. Anyone who believes this I feel bad. One day we are going to have to answer to our Creator

  8. l'elk!
    March 6th, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Jeremy: i already have. i was swimming in the ocean one day and the creator whispered to me "squiggle" and i responded "blob"

  9. jess
    March 6th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    That aint no jelly...thats my second cousin!

  10. rdubs
    March 6th, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    Did it ever occur to you jeremy that evolution is the answer to how god created us?

  11. NeuroGirl
    March 7th, 2008 at 1:17 am

    This is good news for textbook publishers... I never bought the sponge theory. I like this one better. Then again, it'll probably change in another ten years anyway. That's why I love the word theory - we guarantee nothing in biology and the general public is still willing to accept it.

  12. to neurogirl
    March 7th, 2008 at 9:39 am

    what about the theory of evolution? that's pretty much been proven.

  13. NeuroGirl
    March 7th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    If evolution had been "proven", it wouldn't be called a theory anymore. The reason evolution is so widely accepted is that it makes sense and, to be completely honest, it's the best we've come up with. Biology isn't concrete, it's 'we think this happens because we've observed that'. We discover new things about the world around and inside of us every day, and biology has to be able to adapt to these changes or risk being pushed into the soft science category. I teach a class on biological ethics and integrity for college students pursuing research and the first thing I tell them is that if they're going to tell the general public that something is a fact, they had better be able to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt over every single trial.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS