Amazing ant colony

1. Googamooga
   January 17th, 2008 at 1:56 pm

   So just exactly how do they justify murdering all those poor ants just to find out how big the colony was? Savages!

2. Adam Stanhope
   January 17th, 2008 at 2:13 pm

   They lured all the ants away to a new, better colony location using a mixture of watermelon, honey and chocolate syrup. They actually counted and weighed every ant from the original colony to assure themselves and PETA that all of the ants made the transition to the new colony safely. They lost less than one-half of one percent of the ants in the process - an amazing feat in of itself, I think.

   Once they removed the concrete structure from the original colony, they recreated the original colony using wax and plaster. The ants were lured back and have successfully resumed their work.

3. otterly
   January 17th, 2008 at 2:28 pm

   This was illuminating. Thanks very much. However I think I need to see this in HD, Its just fascinating.

4. Christophe
   January 17th, 2008 at 2:55 pm

   Adam : LOL!

   I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords!

5. jack.wh
   January 17th, 2008 at 2:56 pm

   @Adam S - Nonetheless, it’s still disrupting the natural flow of the ants at their work.

6. biltmore
   January 17th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

   Ugh, that announcer was horrible. He should work for the X-games or something.

7. Dim67
   January 17th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

   Extremely fascinating, but a bummer they had to kill off that huge ant-colony for their research.

8. jodie
   January 17th, 2008 at 5:07 pm

   thanks adam! i feel so much better about the whole thing now. lol.

9. BatskyStarman
   January 17th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

   Thats incredible. Can’t they just use some kind of sonar (Jurassic Park style) instead of pumping it full of cement?

10. Adam Stanhope
    January 17th, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    I shared the same concerns, Jodie, and was quite uncomfortable with the situation until I learned how compassionately the scientists handled the ants.

11. VonSkippy
    January 17th, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    Ants come in three quantities: too many, way too many, and bazillions.

    Killing off one colony (for real science no less) hardly makes a difference to the world ant population, and if there was any nearby ant colonies, they’d fight until one was eliminated anyways, so get over it all ready.

    People waste sympathy on the stupidest things here on Neatorama (which is part of it’s charm).

12. jodie
    January 17th, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    above and beyond, is what i’d call it, adam. you just don’t expect that kind of care and concern from scientists these days. it’s always science, science, science. where’s the care, the concern, the compassion? hats off to these fine ladies and/or gentleman of science for their fine display of compassion to this intricately built “city-state” of nature. it’s good to know that all those (possibly millions of) ant-hours of work were not lost. heck, they’re probably even happier in their new state-of-the-art colony of wax and plaster. not to mention the fine vacation they got, complete with all-you-can-eat watermelon, honey and chocolate syrup! hooray for science!

13. artbot
    January 17th, 2008 at 9:05 pm

    Now people are defending ants? I have now seen (or read) it all.

14. Ant
    January 17th, 2008 at 10:32 pm

    It’s a good documentary: Ants - Nature’s Secret Power

15. otterly
    January 17th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    I’m sure ants all over the world are outraged over this genocide of colony 2456938! Never Forget! *Climbs bride and hangs “TURK 2456938″ Banner.

    I don’t know who’s more entertaining, Adam or the Pro-ant activist.

16. Dogrun81
    January 18th, 2008 at 12:12 am

    I like the line that the structure “looks like it has been designed by an architect, a single mind.”

    This is kind of what the ID crowd mean when they say that things have the appearance of design. You have to make a lot of effort and stretching to explain how the ants would have evolved the ability to make that (much less how they evolved at all)

    It’s much simpler (and arguably at least as equally plausible) to state that they were created with innate knowledge or instinct to build their elaborate and functional homes.

17. Vako
    January 18th, 2008 at 7:39 am

    After molested, the ant colony structure sort of reminded me of an Antoni Gaudi design. Sort of.

18. Dan
    January 18th, 2008 at 10:32 am

    It’s not the killing of a bunch of insects that bothers me–it’s the destruction of something that was so wonderful that it warranted its own documentary. It’s truly “a wonder of the world”, so let’s destroy it so we can admire it even more!? Love that logic.

    Tough luck for those ants–maybe the survivors will learn to build a crappy structure next time so we won’t admire it enough to wipe them out and destroy their work.

19. Tornam
    January 18th, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    Dan,

    Please do us all a favor and end your life. Thanks.

20. Davey Wavey
    January 19th, 2008 at 10:27 am

    It is not for us to decide which creatures are significant or not. Destruction of such a marvel of a structure to satisfy one’s curiosity just doesn’t seem right. And no I’m not a die hard animal/insect lover, nor am I a vegetarian. For all those who criticize us for showing some compassion, I hope that one day when someone/something more powerful has your life in their hands, they will show you the same lack of respect for all things living.

21. nf
    November 18th, 2008 at 3:58 am

    “above and beyond, is what i’d call it, adam. you just don’t expect that kind of care and concern from scientists these days. it’s always science, science, science. where’s the care, the concern, the compassion?”

    Scientists are more respectful of the environment now than ever before. Do you really think standards of care and ethics have moved backwards?!

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT