Monitoring Blogs to Catch the Important Stories: Which 100 Blogs Would You Have to Watch?

If you were monitoring a network of water pipes supplying water to various areas, and are worried about an outbreak of water-borne disease, you can monitor the spread of this disease by placing sensors at important junctions and pipes (instead of monitoring every single pipe).

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University used this approach to answer the question "Which blogs should I read to be most up-to-date with important stories?"

They took data from 45,000 blogs and 10 million posts over one year (2006) and tracked 1 million links from blogs to blogs to see how information spread, and to determine which blogs were at the most important junctures, therefore worth reading.

They came up with a list of 100 blogs - some of the blogs listed make sense (like Boing Boing, metafilter, TUAW, and so on) but others really don't: donsurber.blogspot.com? He's not even in the top 100,000 of Technorati but is listed as #2 on the list. Anglican.tk? That's just a spam blog, guys!

Some that should be on the list weren't: Engadget, the world's top ranked blog by technorati isn't there, neither is gizmodo, the second ranked blog. Where's Huffington Post? If you include reddit as a blog to watch, then where is digg?

A big flaw in the paper (which I didn't read carefully) is the presumption that there is a single blogosphere where in fact there are networks of blogs that don't actually link to one another. You'd expect political blogs, which dominate this list, to link to other political blogs, but not to technology blogs. Which "blogosphere" you end up monitoring depends on which blog you pick first.

Link - via New Scientist Technology Blog

And no, Neatorama wasn't on it - the researchers are correct on this count because Neatorama doesn't cover important stories, only interesting ones ;)


Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

I just realized that my webpage is the first result in google when you type in "the warehouse" - so I was pretty jazzed about that. As far as news blogs go I just skim Fark (which is far more informative than watching any news program). News stresses me out. I can't handle most of it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I think they rely too much on algorythms and links in and out, and too little on actual content. If I were compiling such a list by my gut (and I monitor the internet for a living), I would divide the subjects more evenly. This has too much repetition in politics and not enough arts and literature, technology, education, religion, entertainment news, science, and international news. I would also select blogs with more content. For example, HuffPo and Daily Kos have tons of authors and content, those would cover left~wing politics by themselves. I'm sure you could find high~content blogs for right~wing politics and other subjects that would do the same. Science Blogs is good for that reason, but its not all~inclusive; there should be more science outlets.

Another caveat: I'm not familiar with all of these. If they'd posted the name of the blogs instead of just the URL, I might find it easier to understand.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Commenting is closed.





Check out Twaggies' very funny clip:

Om Nom - Twaggies by Twaggies
Email This Post to a Friend
"Monitoring Blogs to Catch the Important Stories: Which 100 Blogs Would You Have to Watch?"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window