Arguments in Bird Seeds



That’s an art installation, titled Dispersed Arguments, by Matt Pych. He used birdseeds to spell out common arguments. I guess it’s sort of a public intervention on an arguing couple, saying that arguments are for the birds anyhow!

This was part of the Dumbo Arts Center’s Art Under the Bridge Festival: Link to the pic above | Gallery - via scoboco


Previous Post
Get Neatorama by RSS or email
Next Post
this post? Please email a friend  +reddit  +SU 
Posted on October 13, 2007 at 1:24 pm by Alex
Category: Art & Craft, Pictures

From our new online store:
» More fun T-shirt designs at Neatorama Online Store

9 comments to "Arguments in Bird Seeds"

  • Mark ElRayes
    October 13th, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    again. more bullshit in the name of art.

    That was harsh, I apologize.

  • Alex
    October 13th, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    Well, what is art?

    Sure, if *everything* is art, then nothing is, but where do you distinguish the line between art and not art?

  • Vonskippy
    October 13th, 2007 at 7:06 pm

    Art by nature is pretty much undefinable.

    But lets not confuse a clever idea, or a unique but simplistic technique as real art. Real art takes real talent, real skill, and real knowledge - none of which all this pop “art” crap has.

    It’s only because real art is so scarce, that the art world, art critics, and more importantly the art snobs (aka investors) have invented all this pop art nonsense so that they have something to build their artificially valued business on.

    Most modern art relies solely on the pompous evaluations of (mostly) people who have no real world skills what so ever.

  • John J.
    October 13th, 2007 at 7:25 pm

    Gratuitous use of the word art…

    I went to the bathroom today. Now THAT was art.

  • ted
    October 13th, 2007 at 11:02 pm

    Whatever Art is, it ain’t the garbage that’s on this dude’s web site.

  • Tempscire
    October 13th, 2007 at 11:11 pm

    It’s more art than that white canvas was.

  • Anthony
    October 14th, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    let’s forget the word “art” and just take into account that those words provoke just as much thought as most pictures.

  • sm
    October 14th, 2007 at 3:43 pm

    Arguing over what constitutes art is like arguing what constitutes beauty. Only people with a lot of free time and little common sense bother.

  • Sid Morrison
    October 15th, 2007 at 11:47 am

    Yeah, it’s tough to argue art. I resort to a simple rule: If the professional artist (I’m not talking hobbyists) can support himself through art, his talent must be good enough that at least a few people find value in it (and are willing to pay for it).

    The converse of course are those “artists” that can’t seem to create anything that anyone is willing to pay for (with their OWN money). If they only survive off government teat (whether outight welfare or through Arts sponsorship programs) then they are but parasites and worthy of rebuke & scorn.


Want your own avatar? Get one for free at Gravatar!



Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. We don't censor comment based on your point of view but comments that are abusive, use excessive profanity, or contain off-topic links may get edited or deleted. On some posts, it may take up several minutes for you comment to show up.


Stay updated on the comments in this post with Comment RSS