Stop War Shadow Grafitti



Spotted in Bloomington, Indiana, is this creative grafitti protesting the war. Way better than those ubiquitous "Stop Hammer Time" stickers:

The piece itself is was stenciled on the floor using a shadow cast by a light post at night, and later carefully sprayed with a ‘camouflage black’ can.

Image: counterclockwise [Flickr] - via connecting the dots


Previous Post
Get Neatorama by RSS or email
Next Post
this post? Please email a friend  +reddit  +SU 
Posted on July 26, 2007 at 1:40 am by Alex
Category: Art & Craft

From our new online store:
» More fun T-shirt designs at our Online Store

19 comments to "Stop War Shadow Grafitti"

  • Jonathan Stampf
    July 26th, 2007 at 5:07 am

    I don’t think so, there’s no lamp post in the scene. It must have been outliined freehand.

  • Jonathan Stampf
    July 26th, 2007 at 5:15 am

    I could see the lightpost on the larger image. Neat.

  • MaxPower
    July 26th, 2007 at 5:45 am

    Yes, that’ll surely stop war.. sigh.

  • ted
    July 26th, 2007 at 6:19 am

    On the floor?

  • David B
    July 26th, 2007 at 6:52 am

    Regardless of the message it’s still just graffiti that our tax dollars pay to remove. If the tagger feels so strongly about their convictions, tattoo them on their forehead, spray paint them on their own car or have t-shirts made. Leave public property alone
    ’cause you’re spending my money for your opinions.

  • johnald
    July 26th, 2007 at 7:17 am

    is pretty neat. makes me think how people feel so helpless about what their country chooses to do - that they have to doodle it on the floor. perhaps tattooing it on mrs.bush’s forehead might have a greater effect.

  • Sid Morrison
    July 26th, 2007 at 7:21 am

    How about a “Stop Vandalism” one next?

  • Trey
    July 26th, 2007 at 8:09 am

    as art its a clever idea !

  • l'elk!
    July 26th, 2007 at 9:59 am

    i am more than happy to shell out tax dollars for the government to clean up graffiti like this. look at it as paying for short term advertising on your freedom of speech.

  • MaxPower
    July 26th, 2007 at 12:12 pm

    ‘ey, Americano! You don’t have freedom of speech. Never had it. You probably don’t even pay taxes.

  • Roger
    July 26th, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    Public space belongs to everyone. Despite its cleverness , it shows disrespect. Yes, some poor guy will have to clean it up. I’m all for freedom of speech, but not for people spray painting public property no matter how satisfied they are with the righteousness of their cause. Aside from all that, there’s nothing persuasive about it, its not changing any minds. At most, it entertains those who are already in agreement, while billing taxpayers who didn’t grant consent.

  • l'elk!
    July 26th, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    can you give me your address so i can spray paint a square on your sidewalk?

  • adam
    July 26th, 2007 at 2:58 pm

    Anyone know exactly where this is? I live in Bloomington, and I’d like to go see it.

    BTW, for all you folks complaining about tax dollars to remove it, Bloomington is a very liberal anti-war college town, and I GUARANTEE the city will leave it be.

  • mrgoodbar
    July 26th, 2007 at 4:24 pm

    OMFG!!! LIBERAL PUKE ON OUR SIDEWALKS!?!?! SEND IN THE NATIONAL GUARD TO PUT DOWN THAT CAMPUS UNREST!!!!!11ONE! OH WAITZ

  • meg
    July 26th, 2007 at 8:08 pm

    I assume you have SO much more freedom of speech, “MaxPower”. Hope you dont try to use it though, then you might realize that YOU have none.

  • Miss Curly
    July 27th, 2007 at 8:56 am

    I’d rather spend my tax money on cleaning “graffiti” than on the war.

  • Roger
    July 27th, 2007 at 11:17 am

    Everyone seems so enthusiastic about volunteering their tax dollars to show solidarity with the political statement. But I assume you all would only be so generous for messages that YOU approve of. The problem I have is not just the drain of tax dollars, but the fact that formerly public (ie, neutral, belonging to all) property has been commandeered for a political cause. Its got nothing to do with how right or wrong the message is, its about not allowing the precedent of letting streets and stop signs be “owned” by whoever decides to do so.

    So many of the people who get riled up when a municipality sets up a Nativity scene or ten commandments are nonchalant about turning a blind eye for this type of thing. Here’s the solution: hands off govmn’t property for all political messages - everybody.

  • Miss Curly
    July 27th, 2007 at 10:00 pm

    Some people take all the fun out of things. Geez, Roger, why’d ya hafta be so logical?

  • Alex
    July 28th, 2007 at 1:21 am

    Gotcha ted - I suppose it’s on the ground, but that quote came verbatim from the website (not that I needed help butchering the English language …)

    And I like Sid Morrison’s cunningly sly idea of a making one say “Stop Vandalism”. Ah, the irony that would be …


Want your own avatar? Get one for free at Gravatar!



Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. We don't censor comment based on your point of view but comments that are abusive, use excessive profanity, or contain off-topic links may get edited or deleted. On some posts, it may take up several minutes for you comment to show up.


Stay updated on the comments in this post with Comment RSS