jstruan's Comments

I would add, the reason I (and I'd wager most others) find this image appealing is because it's a parody of one of the most famous works of art in history. Not because we view it as a religious attack. I'm simply unaware of a similar well-known work of art, related to Islam, that could be parodied in some way that wasn't clearly meant as an attack on Islam.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"It is quite telling that the lampooners wouldn’t dare try the same thing with an image of Mohammed (considered by Islam adherents a prophet, not a deity). Reason? They are scared about how devout Moslems might express their displeasure. Lesson? It’s only OK to mock someone’s religion if you can be reasonably sure they are non-violent."

Is there a famous painting of Mohammed that could be lampooned? I don't think lampooners across the world are afraid of making a parody of such an image. Rather, there's no such image to parody.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"I found the photo you see above here, and posted it because frankly the luxury lederhosen are a big letdown."

In other words, I thought the diamond lederhosen story was interesting, and the Vader in lederhosen photo funny.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
One of the charming aspects of the Thursday Next books is that Londoners are violently passionate about Shakespeare. It never occurred to me Fforde wasn't embellishing...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.


Page 4 of 5     first | prev | next

Profile for jstruan

  • Member Since 2012/08/04


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 71
  • Replies Posted 0
  • Likes Received 1
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More