I did read the whole article, and it states clearly that the school gave her inaccurate information. It was foolish for her to attend an unaccredited law school, but that unaccredited law school (intentionally or unintentionally) misled her.
She fell for an obvious scam, but that doesn't change the fact that she was scammed. There's plenty of blame to go around.
She has a point. Oh, maybe not an actionable point. But the school should have informed her that her degree would be worthless for the purposes of taking the bar exam.
does this answer your question “John Farrier” ?
Since other commenters and redditors are suggesting that these questions are more complex than you are condescendingly implying, then no.
I find Seventh's answer particularly interesting.
She fell for an obvious scam, but that doesn't change the fact that she was scammed. There's plenty of blame to go around.
Stop that man before he marries again!
And I do have a soft spot in my heart for the ancient Egyptian god of frustration.