Daemon: Aggressive much? The "what was he on?" comment is far too prevalent and tiresome. Tummler was just making the point that some folks have an imagination that doesn't require chemical stimulation. Yes DMT is a chemical and external of the body it is considered a controled substance but that is just semantics. Suplementing your body's natural production of DMT is taking drugs to stimulate creativity. Dreaming is not taking drugs regardless of your clever arguments. So no, you didn't actually correct anything. He is correct. Not every piece of abstract art comes from drug usage. Arguing that dreaming is technically drug usage is like arguing that masturbating is technically sex. "it would be significantly less beneficial for you to continue such a line, because the large majority of avant garde artists of any time are/were effected enormously by substance use." 1. the line he was arguing was that not all abstract art comes from drug use. 2. affected, not effected 3. You appear to suffer from an A+ education and a C- mind. You have big words and strong subject knowledge but you can't create a cogent argument. You were arguing against a point that tummler did not make. You were just pushing your own agenda. I have no formal education past the 11th grade. However, I know how to think.
Aggressive much? The "what was he on?" comment is far too prevalent and tiresome. Tummler was just making the point that some folks have an imagination that doesn't require chemical stimulation. Yes DMT is a chemical and external of the body it is considered a controled substance but that is just semantics. Suplementing your body's natural production of DMT is taking drugs to stimulate creativity. Dreaming is not taking drugs regardless of your clever arguments. So no, you didn't actually correct anything. He is correct. Not every piece of abstract art comes from drug usage. Arguing that dreaming is technically drug usage is like arguing that masturbating is technically sex.
"it would be significantly less beneficial for you to continue such a line, because the large majority of avant garde artists of any time are/were effected enormously by substance use."
1. the line he was arguing was that not all abstract art comes from drug use.
2. affected, not effected
3. You appear to suffer from an A+ education and a C- mind. You have big words and strong subject knowledge but you can't create a cogent argument. You were arguing against a point that tummler did not make. You were just pushing your own agenda.
I have no formal education past the 11th grade. However, I know how to think.