Sam Dios's Comments

Well cy here is the original text on the fake Linné butterflies. This happens when people don't think about what they write carefully. I guess there were no photos, but drawn pictures in Linné's book.

Source: museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoaxipedia/Butterflies_of_Linnaeus/

"The three butterflies shown to the right were part of the collection of the great eighteenth-century naturalist Carl Linnaeus. In 1763 he named and described all three of them in the twelfth edition of his Systema Naturae. However, only one of them was a real butterfly.

Linnaeus named the middle butterfly Papilio rhamni. It is a common butterfly in Europe, where it is better known as the Brimstone.

Linnaeus wrote that the other two butterflies were examples of a North American species, Papilio ecclipsis. In fact, all three butterflies are European brimstones. The top and bottom insects have simply had patches carefully painted on their wings. In other words, the Papilio ecclipsis is a hoax species.

This deception was uncovered in the nineteenth century by John Curtis, the author of many books about insects. It is not known who painted the patches on the wings of the butterflies. "
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"[...] all available evidence suggest that she used her expertise as a mystery writer to set her husband as the prime suspect in a murder case - with herself as the supposed victim."

And the evidence is? Public opinion? Paradox, to use public opinion to prove something which is public opinion anyway lol
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.

Profile for Sam Dios

  • Member Since 2012/08/12


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 3
  • Replies Posted 0
  • Likes Received 1
  • Abuse Flags 0
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More