The fact that Neatorama skews left should be obvious to any regular (and honest!) reader. The above poll is only the latest example, offering two equally liberal selections (federal funding for free community college attendance vs. free vocational school attendance) without even the slightest nod to a most obvious third choice: keeping the federal government out of playing Robin Hood entirely--a concept that must be as alien to liberals as the surface of Mars.
Dear Remy Admittedly, a truly touching video. But please be more condescending. Please tell us more about what we should feel, when we should feel it, and how we should behave. And please tell us to what psychologists you refer and to what works of theirs you might cite. Finally, if you would be so kind as to elaborate a bit on your definition of what constitutes "proof," and whether, or to what extent, this might coincide with the Scientific Method of Rene Descarte and Sir Francis Bacon. Thank you. E. Cheung PS- In return for your being more condescending, I will agree, in the future, to be more sarcastic.
Anyone who does not believe an individual should be able to choose whether, and to what degree, they live in privacy, does not believe in freedom. Ask Dyer what he would do about those who did not care for his vision of Utopia.
Oh, PLEASE! "Spontaneous Human Combustion" has been debunked so many times, only noodleheads who don't know how to review BOTH sides of the issue (via, say...the INTERNET) still believe in this kind of crap. And it's sites like these that don't truly vet the research who perpetuate this. (HINT: check out The Skeptics Society, or The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry; better yet, read up on your Scientific Method.)
Uh...anyone else wondering why the mommy was in such a hurry to abandon her kid alone in the driveway? I get that she was calling for help...but she couldn't pick up the kid and swoop him inside? GOOD MOMMY! YEA!!!
Admittedly, a truly touching video.
But please be more condescending. Please tell us more about what we should feel, when we should feel it, and how we should behave. And please tell us to what psychologists you refer and to what works of theirs you might cite. Finally, if you would be so kind as to elaborate a bit on your definition of what constitutes "proof," and whether, or to what extent, this might coincide with the Scientific Method of Rene Descarte and Sir Francis Bacon.
Thank you.
E. Cheung
PS- In return for your being more condescending, I will agree, in the future, to be more sarcastic.
Ask Dyer what he would do about those who did not care for his vision of Utopia.
"Spontaneous Human Combustion" has been debunked so many times, only noodleheads who don't know how to review BOTH sides of the issue (via, say...the INTERNET) still believe in this kind of crap. And it's sites like these that don't truly vet the research who perpetuate this. (HINT: check out The Skeptics Society, or The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry; better yet, read up on your Scientific Method.)
GOOD MOMMY! YEA!!!