Firstly, if a recipe calls for butter, use butter. Margarine is not a version of butter - it is as close to butter as astroturf is to fresh grass. Secondly, the Science Dump article does not answer the question posed in the title of this article. If you really want to know which is better for you, read this article and check the links contained in it. http://tinyurl.com/p2b6s3p And, as the Guardian article concludes: "Don't hold your breath waiting for a climb-down on saturated fat. The healthy eating establishment will choke on its low-fat cornflakes before it coughs that up."
I doubt anyone will agree with the list 100%. But I expect that was the idea. I've only seen 8 of them, so I'm hardly qualified to give an informed opinion, but where was No Country for Old Men, City of God - even Wall-E?
Perhaps their sceintific articles would make sense to more people if they concentrated more on the writing of them rather than trying to crowbar in Dylan quotes.
I have sent this article to The Daily Mail - a British newspaper that is obsessed with this sort of rubbish, particularly with its on-line edition. Usually about D-listers very few people have heard about let alone give a damn about. Just a few examples from today: Former Steps star Claire Richards shows impressive slimline figure during family day out at Legoland - Raising the Bar! Ms. Refaeli displays her endless legs in scalloped Stella McCartney dress as she steps out at amfAR Gala in Milan - Trying to steal the limelight! Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace draws attention to her cleavage in plunging crop top as she attends Nicola McLean's birthday bash. And on and on it goes. What makes it worse is that The Daily Mail used to be a quality newspaper a few years ago, now it's just another "celebrity" obsessed rag.
It would not surprise me if the BBC in it's increasingly desperate search for "inclusivity" in every programme it makes will have made a note of this and use it soon.
If you bother to read the whole story you will find that the stupid mistake was calling a ticket agent in the USA for a flight starting and finishing in Europe. However poor at geography they obviously are, this is a schoolboy error.I think BA was being very generous in offering $376 each plus air miles when it was patently not their fault. Did Gamson not think to check his ticket? Did he not think it odd that the spelling was different? Did he not realise at check-in where he would have seen the difference if he had half a brain? Sue the ticket agent - or yourself for being stupid - not BA. Some people do not deserve to be isssued with a passport.
Secondly, the Science Dump article does not answer the question posed in the title of this article.
If you really want to know which is better for you, read this article and check the links contained in it. http://tinyurl.com/p2b6s3p
And, as the Guardian article concludes: "Don't hold your breath waiting for a climb-down on saturated fat. The healthy eating establishment will choke on its low-fat cornflakes before it coughs that up."
Just a few examples from today: Former Steps star Claire Richards shows impressive slimline figure during family day out at Legoland - Raising the Bar! Ms. Refaeli displays her endless legs in scalloped Stella McCartney dress as she steps out at amfAR Gala in Milan - Trying to steal the limelight! Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace draws attention to her cleavage in plunging crop top as she attends Nicola McLean's birthday bash. And on and on it goes.
What makes it worse is that The Daily Mail used to be a quality newspaper a few years ago, now it's just another "celebrity" obsessed rag.