An engine that hasn't been built yet doesn't have any horsepower, and it's 0% fuel efficient because no matter how much fuel you put it, it's all wasted. He could make any outrageous claims he wants. There's no way to test them yet. But apparently some idiots will believe anything, because there isn't any evidence it's wrong.
The burden of proof is not upon me, but as long as you're asking, the numbers are obviously inflated. I'm sure the engine will be more efficient than what he started with, but I guarantee it won't come close to what he's "conservatively" projected.
Too heavy? Good one.
"Mighty Zeus! No one told me Zima was so strong! My petticoats are in ruffles!"
"This baby food is so spicy. I require a glass of skim milk immediately or I shall surely expectorate!"
Look it up, you weiner:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down%27s_syndrome
Those pictures you've linked to don't look half as downsy as the person in the originally posted painting.
Please try to cover up your ignorance a little more in the future.
An engine that hasn't been built yet doesn't have any horsepower, and it's 0% fuel efficient because no matter how much fuel you put it, it's all wasted. He could make any outrageous claims he wants. There's no way to test them yet. But apparently some idiots will believe anything, because there isn't any evidence it's wrong.
The burden of proof is not upon me, but as long as you're asking, the numbers are obviously inflated. I'm sure the engine will be more efficient than what he started with, but I guarantee it won't come close to what he's "conservatively" projected.