Is it the culture of eating fish; are they simply trying to survive; or is it greed for more money that makes these folks keep on targeting species that are on the endangered list.

There have been good examples of how lower quota's , sometimes zero quota's, for small periods of time have helped replenish stock to a sustainable level.

In New Zealand the fishers have been known to self-imposed smaller quota's to promote the ongoing sustainability of stock rahter than wipe it out and have no livelyhood in the future.

Food/sushi for thought?