"It gets a bit harder if the labels are just randomized." is just a neat euphemism for, "impossible" on the basis of the given information (as you don't know the exact number of marbles in each box)... (e.g. you have to take at least 4 draws in case the boxes each only hold two marbles)
I am strictly aganst capital punishment, inter alia because it is impossible to completely exclude judicial errors. I presume there are lots of people in death rows that share my opinion. However, life and the end of it are very fascinating topics, especcially as it has been prooved unavoidalbe for human beings. So thank you for this interesting article.
Ok, you may "outrun" a walking T-rex.. maybe... And probably a jeep could outrun even a running t-rex...
However it is so sad that none of these animals ara available to put it to a test to see if Tony Martin or Scott Pearson could actually outrun a hungry and hunting T-rex... not only one that is just taking a walk...
Remember that it is completely impossible to outrun e.g. an Elephant... travelling at only 11mph... or a rhino that may run at speeds between 25-31 mph...
When getting in a car, everybody should hope not to be involved in an accident with deadly consequences during the trip... However, accidents happen and people die in accidents, even though it is rather improbable, a residual risk remains that an accident happens and a person will die. However people use cars accepting this little chance of people dying... In germany in 2014 3.377 died in traffic-accidents... On the other hand and people take part in lotteries, with a much smaller chance to winm as there are much less people winning 1.000.000 bucks or more, each year. In my opinion self driving cars should increase the safety of the traffic, but getting in a self driving car will still comprise the residual risk of the car kill you or someone else in a traffic accident. Finally i would not like the car to decide who is going to die...
I presume there are lots of people in death rows that share my opinion.
However, life and the end of it are very fascinating topics, especcially as it has been prooved unavoidalbe for human beings.
So thank you for this interesting article.
as these creatures remind me of the ohm -insect like animals form "Nausicäa from the valley of wind"
But the selected name is admittedly much better and much more descriptive..
"Why are bagpipers always walking around when playing?"
"Cause then it is more difficult to shoot them..."
Malcolm McDowell (when i was younger) and
Javier Bardem (now)...
And probably a jeep could outrun even a running t-rex...
However it is so sad that none of these animals ara available to put it to a test to see if Tony Martin or Scott Pearson could actually outrun a hungry and hunting T-rex... not only one that is just taking a walk...
Remember that it is completely impossible to outrun e.g. an Elephant... travelling at only 11mph... or a rhino that may run at speeds between 25-31 mph...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polikarpov_Po-2
that was in production until 1952...
However, accidents happen and people die in accidents, even though it is rather improbable, a residual risk remains that an accident happens and a person will die.
However people use cars accepting this little chance of people dying... In germany in 2014 3.377 died in traffic-accidents...
On the other hand and people take part in lotteries, with a much smaller chance to winm as there are much less people winning 1.000.000 bucks or more, each year.
In my opinion self driving cars should increase the safety of the traffic, but getting in a self driving car will still comprise the residual risk of the car kill you or someone else in a traffic accident.
Finally i would not like the car to decide who is going to die...