Some of them were pretty stupid. The lions peeing in a port-a-potty one was pretty lame. As though THAT'S the strangest thing in a waldo book. I think the topless lady or the Aztec sacrifice should have been top of the list.
Step 1: Plan a Remake Step 2: Change the lead character to appease the black community while completely upending the whole premise of the original series. Side-note: Change everything about the movie while you're at it to seem original, but keep the basic plot and title, despite neither of them making sense anymore. Step 3: Cast Riley Freeman as said main character. Step 4: ???? Step 5: PROFIT!!!
Ugh, movie directors have run out of new ideas and are just rehashing old things that people love into horrible monsters, like the Chipmunks or Garfield, or the Honeymooners.
I agree with the bomb Hollywood comment above. Or at least the movie ban. There should be a strike on movies until new, original plots are come up with. Anything older than twenty years is off limits to film makers.
It looks like it would be a good movie without the Karate Kid branding, but it'll be just like Eragon, a decent movie that suffers because it doesn't live up to its namesake.
Aye, it's not non-alcoholic alcohol. It's a drug that effects the user like alcohol for a short period of time. I was confused, for a second I thought people were getting excited over the reinvention of near-beer.
Stealing implies some loss to the "victim". Having a material item stolen is a loss, and therefore stealing. Sharing a network without suffering slowdown or having to pay a higher bill because of it is not stealing, It's common courtesy.
Yeah it sucks when everyone starts hopping on your connection, but that's exactly why all networks should be open, or that at the very least cities should supply free internet (not that cock and bull "free" net we used to have to in my town of Fullerton, which turned to a pay service shortly after it was instituted). If people want private networks they should have to pay for that, and not the internet itself.
There is a difference between using an open WI-FI network and pirating games. While I participate in occasional minor piracy (mainly old movies which I don't feel like paying five bucks to rent) I also understand that downloading copyrighted property is stealing, because it's depriving the owner of income. WHEREAS linking up to a wireless network costs the owner nothing, and therefore they suffer no loss as long as their signal is not interrupted to the point of terrible slowdown.
The internet was designed with the intention to be able share knowledge with everyone, therefore, I submit that it is against the very nature of the internet to block personal networks which serve no purpose greater than browsing the web.
Agoraphobia? .... How to you develop an overwhelming fear of marketplaces and large spaces from a game running too slow? That's just called being antisocial and a shut-in. I would love to hear that Blizzard permabanned him, and so did the courts.
Step 1: Plan a Remake
Step 2: Change the lead character to appease the black community while completely upending the whole premise of the original series.
Side-note: Change everything about the movie while you're at it to seem original, but keep the basic plot and title, despite neither of them making sense anymore.
Step 3: Cast Riley Freeman as said main character.
Step 4: ????
Step 5: PROFIT!!!
Ugh, movie directors have run out of new ideas and are just rehashing old things that people love into horrible monsters, like the Chipmunks or Garfield, or the Honeymooners.
I agree with the bomb Hollywood comment above. Or at least the movie ban. There should be a strike on movies until new, original plots are come up with. Anything older than twenty years is off limits to film makers.
It looks like it would be a good movie without the Karate Kid branding, but it'll be just like Eragon, a decent movie that suffers because it doesn't live up to its namesake.
Stealing implies some loss to the "victim". Having a material item stolen is a loss, and therefore stealing. Sharing a network without suffering slowdown or having to pay a higher bill because of it is not stealing, It's common courtesy.
Yeah it sucks when everyone starts hopping on your connection, but that's exactly why all networks should be open, or that at the very least cities should supply free internet (not that cock and bull "free" net we used to have to in my town of Fullerton, which turned to a pay service shortly after it was instituted). If people want private networks they should have to pay for that, and not the internet itself.
There is a difference between using an open WI-FI network and pirating games. While I participate in occasional minor piracy (mainly old movies which I don't feel like paying five bucks to rent) I also understand that downloading copyrighted property is stealing, because it's depriving the owner of income. WHEREAS linking up to a wireless network costs the owner nothing, and therefore they suffer no loss as long as their signal is not interrupted to the point of terrible slowdown.
The internet was designed with the intention to be able share knowledge with everyone, therefore, I submit that it is against the very nature of the internet to block personal networks which serve no purpose greater than browsing the web.
P.S. I'm posting this via an open network.
Mmm, Raspberry.