Ted's Comments
I just wonder what flavour shake that was. The apparent urination is probably just due to film quality, but how "coincidental" is that? Hilarious. At least those Japanese guys had the sense to wear diapers in their videos.
Another thing, are they really singing that song? Cause the words don't match their lips very much.
On the off chance that one of them becomes famous, this will make an excellent embarrassing "before they were stars" video.
Another thing, are they really singing that song? Cause the words don't match their lips very much.
On the off chance that one of them becomes famous, this will make an excellent embarrassing "before they were stars" video.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
You've mixed your media, Dave.
This was a cartoon designed to educate WWII soldiers on the importance of confidentiality. Aside from its 1940's stereotypes, it's mild compared to the real propaganda of its day.
And certainly not on the same par as the (alleged) Fox News bias.
This was a cartoon designed to educate WWII soldiers on the importance of confidentiality. Aside from its 1940's stereotypes, it's mild compared to the real propaganda of its day.
And certainly not on the same par as the (alleged) Fox News bias.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
He totally missed the blue rabbit on the right.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
So they laugh and they get smacked. Cute the first time, but depressingly violent. What was the point?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The link provided showed a lot of glitzy pictures of eagles being removed from book covers, and text disappearing from pages. These images begin to create doubt as to who is actually doing the photoshopping.
How do we know which photo is the original, and if the one with the sign isn't the photoshopped one, created for the purpose of condemning revisionists?
Why would revisionists not simply alter the words of the sign, or place an entirely different sign there, say, directions to the local beerhall? Or just crop the damn thing? Because that isn't as dramatic...?
I don't doubt that signs such as that shown in the photo existed. I don't doubt that revisionists exist. However, I question the validity of this source.
How do we know which photo is the original, and if the one with the sign isn't the photoshopped one, created for the purpose of condemning revisionists?
Why would revisionists not simply alter the words of the sign, or place an entirely different sign there, say, directions to the local beerhall? Or just crop the damn thing? Because that isn't as dramatic...?
I don't doubt that signs such as that shown in the photo existed. I don't doubt that revisionists exist. However, I question the validity of this source.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
That's fishy. How's a plane supposed to land on a triangle?
I smell a cover-up.
I smell a cover-up.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Don't forget 7: the Lucky Number.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
So why wouldn't he pretend that one of his keys were stolen, if he was going to go to all that trouble to fake the theft? Surely he knew about the chip.
Strange case.
Strange case.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Nice to see the chef wipe the cutting board, his face, and the knife with the same cloth.
He looked like he was daring you to say something about it.
Although, if you're eating raw fish, licking salt on the ground outside the restaurant, and wearing home the shoes that you were served dinner on, I guess that's probably not a big deal.
He looked like he was daring you to say something about it.
Although, if you're eating raw fish, licking salt on the ground outside the restaurant, and wearing home the shoes that you were served dinner on, I guess that's probably not a big deal.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
That's like surviving a plane crash and complaining that they lost your luggage.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
What a colossally stupid idea.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It's a cool idea, but the actual process seems a bit painstaking for something that could just as easily be photoshopped. In fact...
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
At last!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Snopes is definitely on the ball calling it an urban legend.
For example, the word "perverted" meant something quite different in 1894 than it does today.
It's cute, and no doubt some people may actually feel the same way as the supposed author.
And don't forget kissing leads to cooties.
For example, the word "perverted" meant something quite different in 1894 than it does today.
It's cute, and no doubt some people may actually feel the same way as the supposed author.
And don't forget kissing leads to cooties.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Thank God I figured it out - it's a really disturbing image, otherwise. LOL