31 trillion digits... that sound very many... i think the fraction of uncertantiy when trying to calculate the circumference of the observable universe from the (exact diameter) is still a very many trillion tiemes smaller smaller than everying man ever has determined to exist. As the path to geth there is very interesing, the nubmer as such .. rather not so... It is the experience they built up calculating pi... not the number itself... (even thoug it may be interesting to look at it)
consiousness transfer! Haha! This Star Wars is so full of bugs and quirky stuff it would better be called "star worms".. Consiousness transfer! no better story? How many other consiousness transferred clones are spirnkeled over the galaxy? An when will they start to fight against each other? The longer this frencise runs the more implausible each of the characters become... Will there be a kind of "force ghost" Palpatine, and a foce ghost Snoke? They had at least a force ghost vader? so when will Force ghost Sith-gang occur and will they fore ghost fight the force ghost jedies? There are some things that should not be used, timetravel and consiousnes transfer are definiteively in the top ten..
How did they measure it? Did they have a kind of "Fart-o-Meter"? So many questions between a gas-flow meter a rear-mounted ballon device or a kind of "inverse Plethysmograph"?
Human language, as opposed to animal signal systems, is only possible due to the ability to reason abstractly. This sounds plausible... But this only seems to point towards that abstract reasoning was before the development of language... The passage "It appears to come from something that is not part of the animal world at all." seems to be based on a misconcesption. He mammal species "Homo Sapiens" is part of the animal word. Homo sapiens uses an aquied language, therefoe it is part of the animal world. The assumption that all other life forms do not use an aquired language seems to me as a theory. The assumption "Nature / Lifforms do not have ... XXX..." is more often incorrect than correct. In most of the cases i would bet on just "not yet discovered". Before fuzzing about "animal world near-death experiences" just make up your mind on how to proove the presence or absence of near death experiences in non-human animals.
The prices some foods achieve at auctions may not be representative. It would be much more interesing how much the average price for theese foods are at an auction.
Hm.. this evolution thing... and near death... the science behind near death seems a possible scienticic subject. However to expect that evolution and near death experiences are connected, seems not plausible to me... Near death expeiences are rather uncommon. Near death experiences are usually connectedt o events that have a very high letality. Therefore i expect that the presence or absence of near death experiences may not have any effect on reproduction, mutation or selection. That is presumably not an evolution thing..
It seems more like a piece of art than something i would actually like to ride on... The technical solution to use bowden cables to connect the handlebar to the fork seems not very suitable for long distance travel... But as a piece of art, it is really nice
As the path to geth there is very interesing, the nubmer as such .. rather not so... It is the experience they built up calculating pi... not the number itself... (even thoug it may be interesting to look at it)
Consiousness transfer! no better story? How many other consiousness transferred clones are spirnkeled over the galaxy? An when will they start to fight against each other? The longer this frencise runs the more implausible each of the characters become...
Will there be a kind of "force ghost" Palpatine, and a foce ghost Snoke? They had at least a force ghost vader? so when will Force ghost Sith-gang occur and will they fore ghost fight the force ghost jedies?
There are some things that should not be used, timetravel and consiousnes transfer are definiteively in the top ten..
The passage "It appears to come from something that is not part of the animal world at all." seems to be based on a misconcesption. He mammal species "Homo Sapiens" is part of the animal word. Homo sapiens uses an aquied language, therefoe it is part of the animal world.
The assumption that all other life forms do not use an aquired language seems to me as a theory. The assumption "Nature / Lifforms do not have ... XXX..." is more often incorrect than correct. In most of the cases i would bet on just "not yet discovered".
Before fuzzing about "animal world near-death experiences" just make up your mind on how to proove the presence or absence of near death experiences in non-human animals.