If feminism were really about equality, feminist groups wouldn't lobby against joint custody and for lifetime alimony.

If feminism were for equality, feminists would be lobbying to recognize and resource male victims of female batterers.

I call 'em as I see 'em. Feminism in the real world is about entitlements for women at the expense of men and children, plain and simple.

@Rumson:

>$9 billion in alimony paid by men to women annually?
>85% of divorced women getting custody of kids?
NOW, other groups continually lobbying against bills to end lifetime alimony, against bills to promote joint custody?

A "handful of women"?

Feminist entitlement is nothing more than sexist bigotry, and the disgusting trend has gotten worse over the years.

Let's see some articles by husbands on how they view their marriages and the institution overall. You can bet the only men allowed to voice opinions in such an article will be pro-marriage, self-effacing "feminist men".

Let's hope the women of Ms. Bolick's cohort save enough for the hysterectomies and cat food lomming large in their futures.

Family law is a grossly bigoted anti-male institution.

Feminists have made it much much worse over the past few decades, or so.

If I had a son, I would tell him not to marry until he was 40 or so, and then only if he wanted kids.

When a man is falsely accused of anything in this country no one cares, that is true even more so for a divorced man who aches to see his children.

Meanwhile in counties across the country, as men are being laid off from their jobs, they are being hauled off to jail or losing their driver's licenses because they can't pay their child support and the courts won't budge.

Good riddance to a feminist institution. More single women = more fun for everyone and fewer men driven into despair and poverty as their children and livelihoods are torn away from them..