Eating right is only part of proper nutrition. You need to also consciously consider how you are digesting your food. Influencer Mairlyn Smith proposes going on a "fart walk" about an hour after you eat. This is a walk in which you let rip with any flatulence you feel forming in your body or, as I call it, a walk.
The New York Post explains the science behind the trend. The motion of the abdominal muscles during a walk encourages intestinal activity. To optimize your flatulence, walk with your hands behind your back and your neck flexing in front of you.
Smith and her husband engage in fart walking as a couples activity. Think of it as a bonding opportunity.
This falcon head is a pretty good work of taxidermy, except it isn't. It's not just a simple recretion, either. Look closely, and you'll see this is a construction of found objects, specifically non-recyclable trash, placed in just the right position to make something totally different at just the right angle. This is the work of Thomas Deininger, whose work highlights environmental concerns. The intricate assemblage shows us the massive variety of trash we produce, but also shows us the wildlife it affects. The falcon head was made quite some time ago, but after an accident trashed it, the buyer came back and Deininger repaired and reworked it into this masterpiece. Let's see another one of his illusions.
The ruby-throated hummingbird is part of an exhibit of Deininger's works called Apocalyptic Ornithology at the Bernice Steinbaum Gallery in Coconut Grove, Florida. See more of Deininger's art at Instagram. -via Everlasting Blort
The first human flight in a hot air balloon was. in 1783. The development of a parachute seems to have followed soon after. It makes sense that if a balloon will descend slowly because of the air inside, even when it's no longer hot, a similar piece of fabric can slow a falling person. However, the first parachutes were not all fabric, but were made of fabric stretched over a frame to keep its shape, like an umbrella.
Robert Cocking was a British artist, and a big fan of hot air balloons. He was in Paris in 1797 to watch André-Jacques Garnerin demonstrate a parachute that brought him to the ground after he released the hot air balloon it was attached to. Cocking wanted to do that, and spent years designing his own parachute. It was also supported with struts like an umbrella, but the fabric was cone-shaped to hold more air. It was honestly a good idea, but was not as thoroughly tested as it should have been before Cocking tried it out in 1837, at 5,000 feet above the ground with a crowd watching. Read what happened the day Robert Cocking became the first death attributed to a parachute at Amusing Planet. -via Strange Company
Some experiments tell us that monkeys can count to three, but not to four. Is there some cognitive function that keeps them from counting higher? After all, monkeys have five fingers on each hand, and ten toes as well, so you'd think they could count at least as high as five. And how do scientists construct these experiments, anyway? You might be amused to find that they do it with magic tricks, because a monkey will display dismay and confusion when a number of objects does not match their expectations. However, it turns out that what we know as counting, and math as a whole, isn't the same for animals as it is for humans. Once scientists figured that out, the way monkeys and other animals calculate amounts makes perfect sense. Human are the weird ones here, and it doesn't have as much to do with our understanding of math as it has to do with our language. -via Laughing Squid
The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), often called "the T" by locals, is responsible for mass transit in Boston and 176 nearby communities. That's a lot of people to service, and the MBTA has suffered criticism for a long time. However, getting the system fixed would cost $24 billion dollars. So this past April, a group of protesters organized a rally to ask for a smaller goal: to put googly eyes on the trains. The group called Googly Eyes MBTA said, "If the trains can’t be reliable, at least they can be fun and bring a smile to the faces of over a million people per day."
It took a while, but the MBTA has come through. Googly eyes have been installed on five trolleys and trains. The public reasoning for the request was to spread joy to Bostonians when they are waiting for a train, but we suspect it was also to judge whether the T was paying any attention to the desires of the public. The appearance of trains with ridiculous faces on the front shows that they do indeed listen to citizens, although they cannot fix the system without adequate funding. And googly eyes are always a good idea. -via Metafilter
In my undergraduate days, I had delusion fantasies of becoming a medieval European historian and wasted a lot of time and money moving in that direction. One of the reasons why this was and remains a very difficult career path is that there are few college teaching positions available in the humanities.
But it would appear that if you can land one, you're set for life with a salary in excess of a billion dollars.
I think that the original (and since corrected) job posting is for this one at Sarah Lawrence College, which has a salary of $10,500 to $14,000, not $1,050,014,000. We humanities people struggle with math sometimes.
-via Matthew Thiessen, who quips "Announcing my immediate shift toward research and teaching on Medieval Literature.
Ever since chests of tea were thrown out into the Boston Harbor during the American Revolution, coffee had been the staple beverage for Americans. So it didn't come as a surprise that one of the main factors that the Union considered as an ingredient of their victory during the Civil War was coffee. However, coffee at that time was pretty hard to come by, given the blockade that the Union had set up in the South, preventing coffee imports from Brazil from entering the country. Luckily, Stephen Allen Benson, who was born in Maryland but emigrated to Liberia to escape tensions in the South, had an interesting proposal to the North.
Being president of Liberia, Benson had told the Americans in the North that they had ample supply of coffee in their country, and they would gladly export them. Thus began the partnership between Liberia and George W. Taylor, a member of the Free Labor Movement, which would continue for the next decade, and supplied the North with coffee for much of the remainder of the Civil War.
However, one thing stood between this partnership, and it was that Liberia had not yet been recognized, and so, no formal trade treaties had existed between the two countries until President Abraham Lincoln officially recognized the republic in 1862. This created an opening for Liberian coffee to enter the American market, and before long, the Union Army was once again invigorated by the sweet-smelling aroma of caffeine.
On the other hand, the dwindling supply of coffee in the South made it difficult for the troops to maintain morale, with some soldiers even attempting to engage in secret trades with the North for their coffee in exchange for tobacco. This was further aggravated when Union troops destroyed 500 sacks of Brazilian coffee in Atlanta, which showed just how much coffee the North had, as instead of consuming the South's supply themselves, they just destroyed it.
At the end of the war, Benson unfortunately died but the trading partnership between Liberia and the US continued, even paving new partnerships to be formed with other countries like Britain and Germany. By 1885, Liberia was exporting about 800,000 pounds of coffee per year, which drastically jumped to over 1.8 million seven years later.
This whole trend of drinking coffee became embedded in American culture, and soon enough, the US was importing 11 pounds of coffee per person, per year.
It has only been 70 years since Alan Turing suggested the idea of computers that can think or act similarly to the way any human would. Now, we have AI like ChatGPT that can write entire books with the help of some prodding and prompting, which goes to show how far we have come from those days when Turing and a colleague of his, Christopher Strachey, programmed the Mark 1, one of the largest computers in those days, to generate a random love letter.
Some of the love letters generated by the Mark 1 can be seen above. They read and sound mechanical, although it's perhaps one of the earliest works of artificial intelligence, preceding ChatGPT, and the story behind Turing and Strachey's collaboration is one that can be considered riveting and poignant at the same time.
Both were students at King's College, Cambridge, where Turing was a master's student in mathematics while Strachey was an undergrad in the same department, but was struggling with his academics, unlike the more prominent Turing, who was considered a genius in his field. Despite Strachey's struggles, he was a brilliant computer programmer.
Their friendship continued until Strachey wrote to Turing about his work on the ACE (Automatic Computing Engine), but mentioned that he was limited by the ACE, and he wanted a more powerful machine to test out some of his programs. Since Turing was working at Manchester at the time, he invited Strachey to visit him so that he can work on the Mark 1.
With that, Strachey was able to program the machine to play a song as well as a run a computer game of checkers. During that period, the two men had also been discussing the future of machines and machine intelligence. Intrigued by the subject, they experimented on how the computer can act more like a human with its own "free will" of sorts, despite being more limited since computers needed to be programmed to function.
In order to bypass this limitation, Turing suggested adding some feature of randomness to give the computer the appearance that it was thinking on its own. Ecstatic at the prospect of programming a computer to think like a human, Strachey collaborated with Turing to create a love letter generator. The rationale being that, to Strachey and Turing, writing love letters was a benchmark of intelligence.
They created a template and gave the computer a pool of choices from which it wold randomly pick words to fill in the template for the love letter. This is why, like the examples shown above, the letter reads a bit clunkily, albeit one can argue that, despite the clunkiness of the output, it had its own personal flavor and, to some extent, originality. In any case, the same can be said about human beings: our free will is limited by an exponentially greater pool of options, but still we can choose.
And so the love letter generator was born, the lovechild of Turing and Strachey, and perhaps, as Patricia Fancher asserts, was the only form through which the two men could express their sweet nothings to each other in a time when such acts were considered criminal in England. Still, it was the "something new" that Turing had been looking for, in his pursuit of developing machine intelligence.
Of course, later on, Turing would be convicted for gross indecency and given a choice between serving time in prison or chemical castration. Choosing the latter, Turing lived his final years, ultimately succumbing to cyanide poisoning ruled as suicide. It's a poignant story, but one that shows how our curiosities, passions, and ambitions can lead to riveting discoveries and creative endeavors.
When I quit my job in mid-2022, I had no idea what was going to happen, and I was anxious about how I'm going to support myself during the period that I would be unemployed and looking for a job. That whole situation was exacerbated by the fact that I'm living abroad and would also have to deal with the ramifications of being unemployed while applying for a residence visa.
Now, it would have been a relief if I had some financial support from the government as I ventured into the unknown in search for another job. However, I was pretty much left to fend against the world all on my own, and that took a lot of hoping and searching to get through, but in the end, I was able to find another job that fit my needs at the time, and so, I didn't have to burrow through my savings too much.
Focusing on the part where it only applies to people who were laid off, that meant that people who voluntarily quit aren't eligible. Thus, it forces people who may be working in low-wage jobs to continue working at their less-than-ideal job just so that they don't have to face the brutal reality of the current job market.
Despite this, a handful of economists are suggesting that perhaps they need to revisit the UI system, which they think requires a major overhaul, one in which people who voluntarily quit their jobs would be able to apply for UI and receive the benefits. That seems a bit counterintuitive to the ethos of the program itself, but some economists have argued that giving people the incentive to quit their jobs will actually be beneficial to the economy as a whole as it helps in the efficient matchmaking of workers to jobs.
I'm not really an economist so I won't be able to explain the nitty-gritty details of the concept, but in essence, the reason behind this idea is the assumption that there are many people who are mismatched to their jobs, or basically have awful jobs and whose skills are being under-utilized. But since it would be more disadvantageous for them to quit and try to look for another job, they just endure and stay at their current jobs.
This also assumes that these people will go on a search for better employment when they do quit, and that they're not simply taking advantage of the unemployment benefits out of laziness. In theory, the idea makes sense. You're giving individuals a sort of safety net that would allow them to look for better, higher-paying jobs that match their skillset which should make the economy better off as a whole.Â
You might ask whether this is what would happen in reality. Well, the pandemic actually gave us an avenue to test that theory out, as many people were either laid off or quit their jobs voluntarily, and were given increased UI benefits. With the dataset provided by the unique circumstance of the pandemic, it showed that, despite the moral hazard of giving people financial aid for quitting their jobs or being unemployed, studies found no connection between the boosted UI and laziness or joblessness.
The truth of the matter is people want to work and given the stress and pressure being heaped upon them by the hard-pressed economy at the moment, they don't see being unemployed as an option. People will continue to look for work, but what they need is the kind of work that fits their skills, their goals and career path, and their threshold for satisfaction.
Now, even the country I lived in for four years had that kind of program. I knew someone who became a naturalized citizen, and after she became unemployed, the government sent her support every month for the next six months while she was looking for a more stable job. And it didn't diminish her desire to look for a job, rather, it pushed her even more to find employment. Given, she was a single mother of two, whose children were already going to college.
Of course, we cannot haphazardly overhaul the entire system simply because it's outdated. We still need to identify the proper eligibility criteria and closely monitor whether the unemployed are actually looking for jobs, but in a capitalistic system, people should be given the freedom to choose what they think would be better for them. The whole idea of capitalism is predicated on allowing individuals to let their preferences dictate where the market should go. And so, stifling that freedom makes the market less efficient.
In the past few years, we've grown familiar with the term "nepo baby" (short for nepotism), referring to Hollywood stars who got their start because their parents were Hollywood stars first. Sure, they wouldn't have made the big time without talent, but they came by that talent naturally, or else were raised with it, plus they had name recognition. What you probably haven't heard of are the many stars who had notable -or notorious- parents outside of Hollywood, or even show business of any kind. Did that help them in their careers? Only for the fact that most didn't have to struggle to survive until they got noticed, for the most part. Maybe they were able to handle fame a little better than the average Joe, but acting wasn't a part of their upbringing. Weird History takes a look at the unlikely stories of ten actors and singers who had parents with surprising stories outside of the business as scientists, politicians, war heroes, athletes, and criminals. And they managed to complete the list without Woody Harrelson.
— Weekly Social Diary (@SocialDiaryMagz) June 26, 2024
A 3,000-pound statue of Abraham Lincoln sits in front of Garrison Elementary School in Washington, DC. The replica of the president's statue in the Lincoln Memorial is made of wax, installed by artist and art professor Sandy Williams IV. It's titled 40 ACRES: Camp Barker. There are ten candle wicks installed in the statue, which students and visitors were encouraged to light for short periods of time.
This all worked out fine in February, when the statue was erected. It was scheduled to stay in place until September. But last week's record-breaking heat wave did a number on Abe, melting the wax so much that his head fell back, and is now completely gone. His legs separated from his torso. And the resulting photographs became a meme. Williams has made quite a few wax statues, and has never had one fail so spectacularly. The rest of the wax mess will be removed before students return on August 26. However, the story behind the statue and the history of its location gets a boost from the unfortunate destruction, and you can catch up on all that at Hyperallergic. -via Nag on the Lake
Grandma would rather stay in bed all day, but she's got things to do, places to go, and people to see. So she takes the show on the road with her motorized bed! Grandma is just being her usual sassy self, all from the comfort of her own bed. The first two minutes of this video are just plain crazy, with Grandma showing off her decadent lifestyle in her comfy bed. The rest is how Ross Smith made her this motorized bed out of a go-cart and a bed. Ross is underneath, doing the driving. Grandma has it easy, being chauffeured around the country without having to get dressed or even get out of the bed to use the bathroom! Well, until her bed hits a ditch at an unsafe speed. I don't believe it was 80 miles an hour, but it was certainly unsafe. And, admittedly, somewhat entertaining. -via Born in Space
When I try to recall the times when I heard the word "please" being used as a means of being polite toward someone, especially when asking for a favor or requesting for something, I only imagine it being said by a mom or another family member who's asking one of the other members of the family to pass something from the other side of the dining table, i.e. "Could you please pass the salt?" or something along those lines.
However, upon reflection, I also realized that you can still say that sentence without using the word "please", and it would still be acceptable. Although we were taught as children to use the word "please" whenever we ask someone to do something, as I grew older, I found other ways of making requests without having to use the word, as I found them softer or gentler than simply adding the word "please" in the sentence. In fact, some experts say that using the word "please" may come off as pushy or intrusive.
A new study from a team at UCLA has found that people use the word "please" only 7% of the time when making requests. Tanya Stivers, a sociology professor at UCLA and one of the researchers in the study said that people only used the word "please" when they expected their requests to be turned down as a means to convince or coerce the other person to actually do the request.
As an example, it would probably be excusable for a child to say "please" when making an unreasonable request or one to which they know that their parents wouldn't agree. And, to drive the point home a bit further, we often see a scene in which a child will even go so far as to say "pretty please" in order to convince their parent or the person being asked to acquiesce to their request. At that age, it's cute, but it's not something that well-adjusted adults usually do whenever making a polite request.
In other words, whenever people use the word "please", it can come off as condescending. Even outside the context of making requests, we often hear "please" being said in a sarcastic or patronizing tone. Furthermore, they found that this isn't a recent trend, but rather, research has shown that the same is true going back as far as the '70s.
Perhaps, the only context or scenario I can think of in which "please" becomes acceptable and less pushy is when somebody pairs it up with the phrase "excuse me", i.e. "Please excuse me" when apologizing for a certain behavior or when trying to leave a certain situation, such as when an awkward scene happens in a room, and you don't want to witness it any further.
Of course, we should still teach our children to be polite, and say "please" in the proper context. But it will also be a good idea to teach them alternative phrases or methods we can use to express politeness.
Oftentimes, using the words "would", "could", or "mind" can express the thought as these words imply that you're giving the listener the power to decide whether or not they want to do the thing you're asking them. They are less forceful and more considerate of the listener's circumstances and position.
Another way is to phrase your question as a suggestion with expressions like "How about..." again giving the listener the option of choosing what they want to do, instead of forcefully telling them what you want them to do.
And finally, leading with words of gratitude or appreciation also help soften the request, and so expressions like "I'd be so grateful if..." or "I would love it if..." can also ease the request into the conversation. Of course, tone and body language can also help get your point across further, and could show the listener our sincerity and humility in asking them a favor.
At the end of the day, it's not as though saying "please" automatically makes somebody sound rude or condescending, and it doesn't necessarily mean that adding it onto one's request will make it polite. It's about the attitude, demeanor, and the way we present our request to the other person, whether we respect their agency and willingness in doing the request.
Brian Wilson was a senior at Hawthorne High School in 1960 when his music teacher, Fred Morgan, gave their class a final project in which they had to compose a piano sonata consisting of 120 measures with five key changes. Instead, Wilson wrote 32 measures with chords. Given that it wasn't exactly what Morgan had asked, the teacher gave Wilson an F. Despite this, Wilson was unfazed, and used this experience as inspiration to write the first song of their soon-to-be formed band, the Beach Boys.
Wilson had been playing the piano since he was a child, and he first started composing music in his teen years. Even though Wilson was quite a popular kid at school and according to his music teacher, "the quietest one in the class", that didn't stop Mr. Morgan from failing him on the project for not following the instructions.
Still, with this newly composed music, his brother Dennis suggested a title and theme for the song, while Mike Love, another member of the band, co-wrote the lyrics for the song. With "Surfin'", the Beach Boys were able to get a contract with a record label, which was soon released as a single, then becoming a hit with 50,000 copies sold, thus propelling the group to stardom.
Going back to that fateful day when Wilson failed his project, he recalled that he failed the class, although it is uncertain whether Mr. Morgan just failed him on the project or on the class. Still, Wilson never held any grudges against the failing grade as it started their journey as one of the most successful rock bands in history.
Sir Ernest Shackleton is quite a legendary, spectacular figure. He led three Antarctic expeditions, originally with the desire to be the first person to reach the South Pole, but was beaten to it by Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen. At which point, Shackleton decided on a new goal: to be the first person to cross Antarctica through the South Pole.
In all three of his expeditions, everybody remarkably survived except on the third expedition aboard the Endurance, when he and his crewmen became stranded in ice and were forced to make the toughest decision to survive. They had several sled dogs as well as the carpenter's cat on that expedition, but due to the conditions they found themselves in, some of those dogs and the cat had to be sacrificed.
Still, the incredible ending to the story is that all 28 of the crew returned safely to London after two years and several grueling experiences at sea and on the ice. After that, Shackleton went on his last trip to circumnavigate the South Pole. Unfortunately, it was on this fourth expedition that he died from a heart attack at sea. He was aboard the Quest, which was later used as an exploration vessel by Norwegian explorers before it sank in 1962.
Now, 40 years later, a group of divers, historians, and oceanographers from the Royal Canadian Geographical Society, have finally found the wreckage of the Quest. By looking through historical data parsed with modern technology, they were able to locate the ship's possible coordinates based on currents, weather conditions, and other factors.
The surprising thing about the discovery of the Quest was that Shackleton's granddaughter, Hon. Alexandra Shackleton, was a co-patron of that expedition that discovered the Quest. Later this year, the explorers plan on making a second expedition to document the wreckage and the artifacts.
(Image credit: Royal Canadian Geographical Society/X)
