That Time the CIA Staged a Vampire Killing

The Philippines became self-governing in 1935, but their former colonizer the United States didn't recognize that until 1946. After World War II, the nations remained allies, but a communist insurgent group called Hukbong Bayan Laban sa Hapon, or Hukbalahap (Huk for short), who formed to fight the Japanese, fought for control of the Philippines.  

The Americans appointed Lieutenant Colonel Edward Lansdale of the CIA to conduct operations against the Huks, which included psychological warfare. Lansdalen was charged with clearing one area of Huks in order to protect withdrawing American troops and their sympathizers, so he leveraged the legend of the aswang, a shapeshifting, human-animal hybrid vampire. This involved seeding the area with rumors of a curse and the threat of a vampire attack to come. The operation culminated in a staged vampire attack, complete with puncture holes in the victim's neck! Read how they pulled that off, and what happened afterward, at Mental Floss.       

(Image credit: Scary Side of Earth)


Comments (0)

"holding people to their obligations" is incredibly subjective. Especially when you're talking about their obligations in a financial system they may not agree with or have been tricked into partaking in.

"holding people to their obligations" is exactly the same thing a loan shark, drug dealer, pimp or many other nefarious professionals would say to sound just. Though the obligations may not have been justly accrued in the first place.

Not that the phrase itself is toxic. But the indiscriminate use of it is more like propaganda than a belief.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
How does this sort of loan work?
Here in Australia you borrow from the bank an amount of money that covers the cost of the house (minus any deposit you have up front) - the contract between you and the bank is that amount of money. If you can't pay the bank seeks to recover the remainder of that loaned money through such things as sale of assets (the house is first of course), re-arranged payment plan, or seeking out the person that guaranteed your loan if the bank thought the risk was too high and asked for a guarantor. The loan is purely over money which the borrower is obliged to repay.
I don't see how walking away form a loan and a house can legally work? Is the agreement different to a loan of money?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
DeCaff has a good point. This "walk away from the mortgage" mentality is part of what is killing the US economy. Someone, somewhere, somehow has to pay.
Hello USA, welcome to the rest of the world.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
You can't just walk away from a mortgage. When you owe the bank $100,000 and they foreclose on the house then sell it for only $75,000 you still owe them the $25,000 difference and they continue to charge interest. The only way to stop this is to file for bankruptcy and surrender the house or if the bank agrees to a short sale (good luck with that).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Scotchdrnkr - actually it depends on the loan, whether it's a recourse or a non-recourse loan.

Typically, though not always, your primary loan is a secured loan - it's secured with the title of the house you bought. So if you walk away from that loan, your bank gets the house (but nothing else - even if that house is worth less than the loan).

Secondary loans are almost always recourse loans - so your bank will go after you for every penny of their money.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
They're going to come after you if you don't pay, just like with a car loan. I don't feel sorry for the people in the story. One guy let his house go without payments for 9 months, then bought another house right before the first one foreclosed? The other guy had a vacation home that was foreclosed on. If you own a second home, they will most certainly come after you for the difference, because you have assets that can be liquidated. Losing a job and not being able to pay your mortgage is one thing, and I truly feel horrible for the people in that situation, but the people this story covered makes me feel no remorse for them.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Alex has it pretty much. A secured loan can have a deficiency amount owed to the bank, it becomes an unsecured debt after foreclosure and can be discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. On the recourse/non-recourse loans, sometimes those are cross-collateralized to other property. If you have a vacation home with a loan, the bank might also attach some of that debt to your primary residence in case of default. I've seen that with second homes before, and I've also seen it on multiple secured debts with the same bank. Think car, motorcycle,boat, etc. (I used to do bankruptcy law....man, it sucked.)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The way it works in Canada is like how DeCaff described for Australia; you pretty much can't walk away from your mortgage obligation without declaring bankruptcy. You also can't deduct the interest on your mortgage. This drives a generally debt-adverse behaviour by borrowers. Canadian home prices dropped in 2008, but recovered quickly and since late 2009 have been higher than ever before (but are slowing down again.)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"That Time the CIA Staged a Vampire Killing"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More