Why You Can't Recall Being Born

Ask anyone about their earliest memory, and they'll probably tell you something from when they were about three years old. Memories from much earlier than that are probably fake, derived from photographs or family stories. But why can't we remember our infancy? Some research suggests that we have trouble storing long-term memories of events that occurred before we have the language to encode them. Newer research suggests that infants have to learn and develop the process of long-term memory storage.

We know that babies form memories. Their entire job is learning, after all. Newborns quickly learn to recognize their mother's face. They learn how to elicit a response from their parents. And as they age, their ability to learn gets better with exercise. In an experiment, when six-month-old babies were trained for one minute to activate a toy with their legs, they would remember it for a day. Older infants would remember the task for much longer. But if you spent more time training, the memories would last longer even for younger infants. Newborns see their mother's face every day, often many times a day, so they don't have to store that memory for a long time. As we age, we learn to remember. Maybe it takes until the age of three to learn to store permanent memories. Read more about this research at The Conversation. -via Damn Interesting

(Image credit: Carin Araujo)


Comments (1)

Newest 1
Newest 1 Comment

ya i remember reading somewhere that you don't have the ability to remember things until around age 3. I'm sure it's on a spectrum though - by that I mean some people can probably remember even further back.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
While I probably agree with the findings that they summarize in this story, it seems to me that it's not the best test. For example, the music that was deemed "angry" went into the lower musical registers. So that may just mimic an angry person's voice, and we get our cue from that. The "peaceful" music was slow. I think the study needs to be widened. What about slow music that's very dissonant? Probably not peaceful. What about angry music that's high in pitch? Maybe not angry anymore. I think they're making some assumptions that aren't necessarily completely true, and leaving out some of the possibilities that cause people to interpret music emotionally. Rhythm, pitch, instrument timbre, arrangement, orchestration. Music has so many variables, and this seems to be far from being able to make such definitive statements as it does.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"Why You Can't Recall Being Born"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More