Oldie But Goodie: The Computer Chip Brain of NASA’s Perseverance Rover

It’s only reasonable to think that all the components of NASA’s Perseverance rover are new. After all, it is the successor to the Curiosity rover, and it was only launched last year. And so it would be a surprise to find out that the Perseverance’s brain is a piece of technology from the late 90s. That’s right. A processor released by IBM and Motorola over two decades ago, in 1997, serves as the brain of the Perseverance rover. The question is, why?

The craft's developers were more interested in reliability than sheer power, and their solution was a G3 processor, or CPU, used in Apple's Power G3 Macintosh starting in 1998.
Apple veterans remember the G3 fondly. It was a futuristic, tower-style computer of translucent white and blue. Its side conveniently flipped open to facilitate expansion. It smoked older Macs with a processor operating speed that topped out at a screaming 266 megahertz (MHz).
Or so we thought at the time. Today's processors leave the G3 in the dust. The processor in an Apple iPhone 12 runs at 3 GigaHertz (GHz), while a Samsung Galaxy S21 runs at 2.9 GHz in the U.S. model.
[...]
The chip in Perseverance, the PowerPC 750, isn't even the fastest G3 chip — the single-core chip runs at 200 MHz, which is still 10 times the speed of the chips powering the Spirit and Opportunity rovers, according to NASA.

(Image Credit: NASA/ Big Think)


Comments (2)

Newest 2
Newest 2 Comments

If it gets the job done better and it is all that you need, why not? Who would give bottles of supper glue to kindergarten students who only needs the white craft glue? Doing so would only be asking for trouble.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
its the same reason cash registers run windows 98 and slower processors. Windows 98, after many years of updates became a brick outhouse. It was very stable, and very compatible. Older processors and older operating systems that are tried and true - they have many uses.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Oh, I fully imagine a scenario where someone would take a cat back, or any animal for that matter. I would just never do it. Just like I would never toss a child back who may have 'issues' of which can also be imagined. But then I prefer animals to people so maybe that makes it 'easier' for me.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  1 reply
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"Oldie But Goodie: The Computer Chip Brain of NASA’s Perseverance Rover"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More