MIT Scientist Monitors His Son for 90,000 Hours to See His Vocabulary and Learning Development

In a talk on TED.com, cognitive scientist Deb Roy shared a remarkable experiment that hearkens back to an earlier era of science using brand-new technology. 

From the day he and his wife brought their son home five years ago, the family’s every movement and word was captured and tracked with a series of fisheye lenses in every room in their house. The purpose was to understand how we learn language, in context, through the words we hear. 

A combination of new software and human transcription called Blitzscribe allowed them to parse 200 terabytes of data to capture the emergence and refinement of specific words in Roy’s son’s vocabulary. Roy later on analyzed the results through graphs.

Roy is now taking the amazing research capability and team he’s developed and applying it to commerce. He’s on leave from MIT and has founded a VC-backed company called Bluefin Labs that applies these same high-powered analytics to relate, not the speech of a child to that of a father, but events broadcast on TV to conversations taking place in social media, the better to chart “engagement” with the State of the Union Address or Jersey Shore or a car commercial.

What an interesting way of taking his ideas out of the lab and into the world!

(Image Credit: Deb Roy via Fast Company)


Comments (0)

While DNA evidence can be a very powerful tool, ensuring an uncontaminated sample is extrodinarily difficult, as this example shows.

I predict a major unravelling of DNA based convictions over the years as the true scale of the problem becomes apparent.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@mishelley

That's only a problem if we start rounding up cotton factory workers as killers. The bad part of this is that potentially good samples were tainted by the factory worker's DNA.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ Chris

Some capital convictions have been based on DNA evidence.
Conviction for a capital crime in a state allowing the death penalty results in the death of a prisoner.
As this story illustrates DNA evidence can be contaminated.
Death is a permanent condition.

There is a chance that some contaminated DNA evidence has been used in the wrongful conviction of a suspect, and that suspect could be executed.

The point of my comment was rhetorically questioning whether we should impose an irrevocable sentence based on science that can be flawed.

Or, "don't put all you dinucleotides in one basket"
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
GOODAY

I AM NOT TOTALLY HAPPY, WITH ALL THE INFORMATION I HAVE READ ABOUT SERIAL KILLERS, PERSONALLY I THINK WE NEED BETTER LOOKING SERIAL KILLERS, SERIAL KILLERS THAT HAVE COMMITTED ALL AND MORE OF THE CRIMES I HAVE READ ABOUT, AND BETTER ACTORS FOR TRICKING VICTIMS.

GOODBYE
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
GOODAY AGAIN

WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT IS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS HAPPY KILLING, NOT-SCARED OR BETTER SAID NOT INFLUENCED BY ANY SITUATION. SOMEONE WHO CAN ACT TO ANY DEGREE, HOLDING OUT FOR 20 YEARS, TO TRICK A VICTIM. EDUCTATED AND PRACTICING THOSE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE OR CURRENT. GOOD MANNERS, PRONOUNCED SPEECH OR COMBINATIONS OF DIFFERENT ACCENTS, MOODS, ETC PERMENANTLY APPLIED. FIT TO THE TOP LEVEL OF THE 5BX. 80'S FEEL, WITH SUPERSTARS ON THE SIDELINE.

YEAH
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
GOODAY AGAIN

WHETHER YOU SCREAMING OR SAYING SOMETHING AT THE POINT OF HEARING, TO SAY IT PRONOUNCED. COMPLETELY STEALTH, UNDETECTABLE. AS THE POLICE RISE YOU RIDE WITH THEM. AND LIKE 2PAC, ALMOST LIKE YOU DID THAT SH*T.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
GOODAY AGAIN

FOR EG, NO TATTOOS, GOLD TEETH WANNA B'S BULLSH*T. STUDYING COMMUNITY REACTIONS AND STATUS QUO TO BACK IT UP. IF YOU WLK AND INTERCEPTED BY A THUG, YEAH NEVER AGAIN, BUT ITS UNDER THE STREETLIGHT WANNA BEES. POLICE COMMING IN, ACTING NERVOUS ETC
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
GOODAY AGAIN

I WOULD SAY TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF AS A SERIAL KILLER, IT IS SOMEONE, COMPLETELY OPPOSING THE CURRENT INTERREST, SOMEONE NOT SCARED BY THREATS, MUTLLE THREATING PRESENCE, YOU COULD SAY SO IF YOU ACTED THE POSITION OF NOT BEING FOLLOWED AROUND, WHEN YOU WERE ACTUALLY UNDER THREAT, REMAINING IN THE HARVARD EDUCATION THEME, AND PRACTICE.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
GOODAY

I'LL GIVE YOU AN INDICATOR OF WHAT ITS ABOUT. EVERYONE THINKS THEY THE BEST, STARTS FROM 16 AND NEVER THINKS THEY CAN LOOSE, EVEN IF THEY HAVE KILLED. SMALL SITUATION HAPPENED, COPS MOVED IN, TO INTIMIDATE INDIRECTLY, SO YOU WALK OVER A CAR, AN ACTIVATE A LADY TO BE KNOCKED OVER, GOT IT ON CAMERA, AND DO THE RECOVERY.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 0 comments
Email This Post to a Friend
"MIT Scientist Monitors His Son for 90,000 Hours to See His Vocabulary and Learning Development"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More