The Border Wall Won't Stop Drug Entry in the US, But Maybe an X-Ray Machine Can

One of the justifications that Donald Trump had for wanting to build his beloved border wall is to stop the flow of drugs in the US. However, data from the US Customs and Border Protection  (CBP) proves that wrong:

In 2018, for example, 90% of heroin, 88% of cocaine, 87% of methamphetamine and 80% of fentanyl seized by officials was smuggled through legal crossings.

To prevent future entry of illegal drugs in the future, the CBP is relying on x-ray technology to detect attempts to smuggle such illegal drugs:

In all, a CBP spokesman told CNET, the agency has more than 300 drive-through scanners, 3,500 small-scale X-ray machines and 35,000 handheld devices deployed at US ports of entry. In the 2019 federal budget, CBP received an extra $520 million for additional nonintrusive inspection technology at land border ports of entry.
"The focus is not just to replace aging systems," Robert Perez, deputy commissioner of CBP, said before the House Committee on Homeland Security on May 9, "but to transform port operations in order to expertly facilitate legitimate travel and trade, while successfully interdicting deadly fentanyl and other contraband."

To know more about CBP’s attempts to prevent illegal drug smuggling in the US, go to cnet.com.

image taken from cnet.com


Comments (1)

Newest 1
Newest 1 Comment

A good place to get your "i.e's" and "e.g's" right you should get the podcast called "Grammer Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing."

Good stuff, yo!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I specifically remember learning that i.e. can also mean "in exemplum," which makes that usage of it identical to e.g. Anybody know of a debunking of that notion?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
For people, I use "et alia" (or "et al.") rather than "etc." It means "and others." I've never heard of "i.e." meaning "in exemplum," but a quick search via Google shows that this is a common (mis?)perception.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Reminds me of my favorite sequence from Get Shorty:

"Ray "Bones" Barboni: Let me explain something to you. Momo is dead. Which means that everything he had now belongs to Jimmy Cap, including you. Which also means, that when I speak, I speak for Jimmy. E.g., from now on, you start showing me the proper fucking respect.
Chili Palmer: "E.g." means "for example". What I think you want to say is "I.e.".
Ray "Bones" Barboni: Bullshit! That's short for "ergo".
Chili Palmer: Ask your man.
Bodyguard: To the best of my knowledge, "e.g." means "for example".
Ray "Bones" Barboni: E.g., i.e., fuck you! The point is this: is that, When I say "jump", you say "OK", okay?"
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Shabby! Not only is a commenter trying to pull a fast one (with a phony phrase, "in exemplum," for "i.e."), but also the main post has an error in each explanation of three additional abbreviations,
(1) "C.f." should be "Cf." -- without the extra period.
(2) "Etc." is not "the abbreviation for "etcetera" -- but rather the abbreviation for "et cetera" (with a space between the two Latin words).
(3) "QED" is not the "abbreviation for quod erat demonstradum" -- but rather the abbreviation for "quod erat demonstrandum" (with an "n" before the second "d."
Tsk, tsk!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"The Border Wall Won't Stop Drug Entry in the US, But Maybe an X-Ray Machine Can"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More