A Few Notes About Alkaline Water

Alkaline water has a higher pH level than pure water and so is more basic. Does that make it better for your health or not? Here are a few points that might help elucidate what these "ionized" alkaline water can do to our body.

(Image credit: Levi XU/Unsplash)


Comments (7)

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

Discussing technical errors in pop-sci can be a slippery slope.

E.g. it is perfectly fine to say hydronium/hydroxide ions have an extra/missing hydrogen atom. The term atom doesn't imply neutral, and so in chemistry a proton is still referred to as a hydrogen atom (hence why some push to call it a hydron instead of a proton... not that I've heard anyone actually use that term used outside of work with deuterated chemicals). Saying the "pH is inversely proportional to the concentration of hydronium ion" will draw ire from some math crowds as "inversely proportional" has a very meaning (1/x) that doesn't apply to pH vs OH concentration. Equal numbers of hydronium and hydroxide ions is what is called neutral as neither dominates, so effectively they do "cancel", just cancel is a horribly imprecise word (I knew several profs, especially in math, that would call out a student using the word cancel in nearly any context as it was often too vague and misleading). Since self-ionization of water depends on temperature and mass, neutral pH being 7 only happens for light water near 25 C. "they exist in a state of natural equilibrium at pH 7" seems kind of meaningless as there will be a natural equilibrium for just about any pH once reactions have settled... ad nauseum.

In general any discussion of acids and bases in popsci is going to be a minefield, as the Arrhenius definition of acids and bases is quite narrow and effectively now almost a century out of date. But it is also way more straightforward to laymen than the Brønsted–Lowry definition and effective for common situations. There are a lot of subject like this where things are left fuzzy, vague or possibly sloppy to avoid going too far down the rabbithole.

Where to draw the line with technical correctness in popsci writing is a massive source of debate among scientists trying to write for outreach. Most discussion panels I've seen on the topic breaks down into two camps: those who say, "you have to lie a little" to effectively teach intro science and those that insist you have to do a very careful dance to be technically correct while sticking to the point. (Personally, the latter approach fails once anyone edits your writing...). Regardless of approach, a lot of people who know the science are just bad at writing anyway...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I have to admit that I didn't read the other link, but when I see content like this, I have no reason to:

_Acids release hydronium ions (basically a positively charged water molecule with an extra hydrogen atom); the lower an acid's pH, the more ions it releases. Because the pH scale is logarithmic, an acid with pH 4 produces 10 times as many hydrogen ions in water than an acid with pH 5, and 100 times more than an acid with pH 6.

Meanwhile, bases release hydroxide ions (a negatively charged water molecule with a missing hydrogen atom) when dissolved in water. Despite the fact that pure water actually contains hydronium and hydroxide ions itself, they cancel each other out. As a result, it has a perfectly neutral pH of 7._

1. Hydronium ions do not contain an extra hydrogen atom; they contain the proton from hydrogen dissociation, which is why it carries a positive charge.
2. "The lower an acid's pH, the more ions it releases" is nonsense. It should read, "pH is inversely proportional to the concentration of hydronium ions. The greater the concentration, the lower the pH".
3. Hydroxide ions are a negatively-charged water molecule missing a proton, not missing a hydrogen atom.
4. "Despite the fact that pure water actually contains hydronium and hydroxide ions itself, they cancel each other out. As a result, it has a perfectly neutral pH of 7". More nonsense. The ions do not cancel each other out; they exist in a state of natural equilibrium at pH 7, meaning that the concentration of both hydronium and hydroxide ions is 10^-7. Look at the pH chart in the link; this is exactly what it illustrates.

Anyway, most alkaline water contains alkalinity, which raises the pH. Again, from my article, "Hard water has a high pH mainly due to the presence of carbonates and phosphates (hydroxides do not occur naturally) but chlorides and sulfates also contribute when in the presence of calcium and magnesium. Depending on the vendor, supermarket alkaline water may contain hydroxides, carbonates, phosphates, and chlorides, all in varying quantity. A brand called Crazy Water is naturally occurring hard water, available in 4 degrees of hardness. Others are formulated from pure water, typically that produced by reverse osmosis, with the addition of alkaline food-grade additives.

There is also available ‘ionic’ alkaline water that contains no added chemicals such as those described previously but rather is the product of induced dissociation with stabilizers. A commercial brand available in supermarkets is “Essentia” and it boasts a pH ≥ 9.5. One can even purchase a home water ionizer but they are costly."

To the layman, the linked article is misleading and it contains technical errors. 'Nuff said.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Blech, that was a waste of 10 minutes. It's a funny idea, but they just copied jokes, and poorly at that. Not to mention repeating Holy Grail jokes has been done and overdone for decades now, so it's even less funny than it would be otherwise. Don't waste your time with this.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Since the word “Brilliant” was used before the word “Parody” in the description you wrote, I take it your mean “a humorous or satirical imitation of a serious piece of literature or writing”. I have to disagree, and propose you change :brilliant” to “dimwitted and dull”– which would more accurately describe the type of parody it is - a “a poor or feeble imitation or semblance”.

This is a typical piece of advertising plagiarism… without an idea of their own; they steal someone else’s idea and then make a mess of it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
wow, this is bad.
Really really bad.

Perhaps it's less awful if you are familiar with the people in the video? I'm guessing they are US sports stars.

can you add a tag for 'failed viral'
and perhaps 'unconvincing astroturf'
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
You know, there was a time (possibly after the horrible PC video game) when I thought Monty Python couldn't sell out any more.

Wow. I hope Eric Idle has fun in his gold Bentley.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I love Monty Python and The Holy Grail. I hate these ads. I saw it on tv and though it was pointless and ineffective.

That seems to be what Gatorade is trying for. The last campaign for "G" left so many people just scratching their heads because they had no idea what "G" was. The ad was a long line of athletes, actors, singers, dancers etc. against a black background with a boring voice over that did not give any clue about what the product was and offered no information on how to find out.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Thank you for Johnny Cat. I did need that.

And SenorMysterioso, those other ads were so strange before they got to the mimes, but then there were MIMES and it fell straight off the edge of strange into WTF land.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"A Few Notes About Alkaline Water"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More