The Effect of Hollywood on Historical Perspective

Pollsters asked French citizens who contributed the most to the defeat of the Nazis in World War II. The poll was conducted in 1945, then repeated in 1994 and 2004. As you can see in a graphic from Olivier Berruyer, the results changed over time. Of course, most of the people polled in 1994 and 2004 were not around during the war, and what they know was learned in classrooms and movie theaters. The movies aren’t necessarily wrong, but the Hollywood film industry tells stories they know, that are available in a language the industry speaks.

In another graph at the same post, Berruyer shows us that 11 million soldiers of the Soviet Union died in the war, and as least as many civilians, making the USSR the country with the highest casualties of all. China was second, as Chinese civilians bore the brunt of Japanese atrocities. The United States lost 184,000 soldiers in the European theater, and 407,000 when you include the Pacific theater. 

The effectiveness of the USSR in defeating the Nazis is colored by the utter brutality of the Stalinist regime, and clouded by the secrecy of Soviet isolation over the ensuing 50 years. However, the sheer numbers have a tale to tell, and we haven’t been telling it as well as we could. The post at Les-Crises has more graphics on World War II, which are all in French but pretty easy to understand. -via reddit

(Image credit: Olivier Berruyer)


"The effectiveness of the USSR in defeating the Nazis is colored by the utter brutality of the Stalinist regime, and clouded by the secrecy of Soviet isolation over the ensuing 50 years. However, the sheer numbers have a tale to tell, and we haven’t been telling it as well as we could."
Human wave attacks do make for good story telling. Isn't "effectiveness" stretching a bit?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  1 reply
"Which nation contributed the most to the defeat of Germany?" and "Which nation suffered the highest number of casualties against Germany?" are two different questions.

But, yes: more than any other nation, the USSR was responsible for bleeding Germany dry.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country." Spoken by the title character in Patton, the movie.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
From a French perspective, you have to add that the communist party was representing +20% of the votes after the war, and less than 2% in 2007. People are less connected with the communist ideal. It regained lately some elections % by giving up the hammer and the sicle and its name, being now 'Front de Gauche'.
It's easier to like Eisenhower than Staline.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  3 replies
I see no evidence to confirm the dogma that opinions in 1945 were 100% correct. In fact the perspective that history offers should not be underestimated. Certainly, many classified programs are only revealed several decades later. The major US economic support of both the Soviet Union and Britain (long before US entry into the war) was quite instrumental in preventing a runaway Nazi victory. That's the whole reason Germany wanted to declare war on the US, and allied with Japan to get the job done. Little bits of info like that may be better known to French citizens now, than they were immediately after the war...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  1 reply
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 11 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"The Effect of Hollywood on Historical Perspective"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More