Banksy's Latest Work Is A Cardinal Sin

Banksy has literally defaced a statue in his latest work, replacing the face of a replica statue with pixels as a political statement:

Banksy titled the statue “Cardinal Sin”, and designed it as a comment on recent crimes perpetrated by the Catholic church—a response to the child abuse scandal that was covered-up.

In a statement,
Banksy said: “I’m never sure who deserves to be put on a pedestal or crushed under one.”

It's a statement, no doubt, but is it worthy of sitting alongside the works of Van Dyck and Rubens?


I like how the link says it was "vandalised", but it's actually on display.

The article also says it's an 18th century stone replica, not a replica of an 18th century statue. So did he actually create a replica of a statue or deface an original one? Not very clear...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Pretty sure Banksy's "artwork" is more of a stand against politics then anything else. I don't think he is trying to be nor wanted to be a "Van Dyck or Rubens". His "artwork" isn't art in a traditional sense...

That said, I'm not sure I like the last statement of the article, as if we are all trying to compare him to artists of the traditional schools of art theory. Banksy is anything but. I would compare him more to V from "V for Vendetta".
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 2 comments

Email This Post to a Friend
"Banksy's Latest Work Is A Cardinal Sin"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.


Success! Your email has been sent!

close window

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
Learn More