Man Owes Money for Working For the Government For No Money

Richard Ravitch was sworn in as New York's liutenant governor in 2009, to fill a vacancy and help solve the city's dire fiscal crisis. Ravitch, a wealthy businessman, was gracious enough to forgo the $151,500 annual salary.

And in an example that no good deed goes unpunished, he now owes money for working for no money:

While working on the memoir earlier this year, he received a letter from the state comptroller. It was not a thank you note for serving, much less without pay. It was a bill.

“The value of your personal use of a state provided vehicle and chauffeur services and taxable meals when traveling are fringe benefits reported as income on your Form W-2,” the letter began.

Those $9,455 in fringes were subject to $723.31 in Social Security and Medicare taxes, which the state paid on his behalf and was now seeking to collect ...

What did Ravitch do?

“I paid it,” Mr. Ravitch said Monday, adding philosophically: “There was a certain asymmetrical irony about it, but I hope it helps the budget gap.”

Sam Roberts of The New York Times' City Room blog explains: Link


He can come govern in my state any day, and I'll pay his taxes for him. Small price to pay for someone wanting to volunteer his time and talents, and to help a budget crisis.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It seems he only had to pay taxes for the part of his salary that he _did_ take, the fringe benefits. Had he taken the salary as well, it would have been subject to taxes in addition to that.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Surely a businessman would know fringe benefits are taxable. I just finished paying taxes on a benefit I didn't ask for, didn't want, and couldn't opt out of (life ins.).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sounds like a good guy, but as stated by others, he WAS receiving compensation for his work, in the form of a car, a driver, and meals. If all the govt is trying to collect is $723, I'd say he got a good deal.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Dagonet, Ray, Craig: I think you're missing on the big picture here. Had he received the full salary, he would've owed more taxes indeed -- but he would've payed them from the salary, and, by definition, he would've still had something left. And he would've also payed the taxes for the car, driver, meals and whatever else from said salary -- and he would've still had something left (this isn't necessarily always true, but in his case it is). So the state would've payed for all of the benefits PLUS the salary, only to receive a fraction as taxes.

Now, when he DOESN'T get the salary (thus reducing the burden on the budget, as shown above), you'd expect the state to at least cancel the taxes for fringe benefits, given that it would've still ended up in the black.

Or to put it another way, when your friend helps you move do you charge them for the beer?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Doesn't sound like he's complaining much about it, and why should he?

If he had used his own car and chauffeur, and paid for his own meals, then it would be different.

$723 for some meals, travel, and the use of a car for a year? I'd pay that.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ted, my company happens to have a very similar job opening. It's really, REALLY cheap, you will only have to pay some $700 per year. If you're a good boy I'll even throw in a few car rides and maybe a couple of meals!

Come on, let's do some business together!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 11 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Man Owes Money for Working For the Government For No Money"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More