The Finnish Not-So-Secret Weapon for Top Notch Schools: Better Teachers

It seems like every day we're reminded how American kids are falling behind in science and math (we're ranked 24 out of 34 countries that participated in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).

China, the top-ranking country in math, relies on long hours in school (and after school) to teach their students - so it's natural to think that the key to improving US schools is to turn them into dens of Tiger Mothers.

But is there a better way? Turns out, Finland, who ranked second in the list has a very different - and some say better - approach. The key? Better teachers.

Finland's sweeping success is largely due to one big, not-so-secret weapon: its teachers. "It's the quality of the teaching that is driving Finland's results," says the OECD's Schleicher. "The U.S. has an industrial model where teachers are the means for conveying a prefabricated product. In Finland, the teachers are the standard."

That's one reason so many Finns want to become teachers, which provides a rich talent pool that Finland filters very selectively. In 2008, the latest year for which figures are available, 1,258 undergrads applied for training to become elementary-school teachers. Only 123, or 9.8%, were accepted into the five-year teaching program. That's typical. There's another thing: in Finland, every teacher is required to have a master's degree. (The Finns call this a master's in kasvatus, which is the same word they use for a mother bringing up her child.) Annual salaries range from about $40,000 to $60,000, and teachers work 190 days a year.

"It's very expensive to educate all of our teachers in five-year programs, but it helps make our teachers highly respected and appreciated," says Jari Lavonen, head of the department of teacher education at the University of Helsinki. Outsiders spot this quickly. "Their teachers are much better prepared to teach physics than we are, and then the Finns get out of the way. You don't buy a dog and bark for it," says Dan MacIsaac, a specialist in physics-teacher education at the State University of New York at Buffalo who visited Finland for two months. "In the U.S., they treat teachers like pizza delivery boys and then do efficiency studies on how well they deliver the pizza."

Link


Interesting. However, Finland has a very small, homogenous population and are fairly blessed with their resources. Difficult challenges such as overcoming language barriers, overpopulated schools and grinding poverty are unheard of in Finland. It's annoying when the media is so blind to these differences when presenting Scandanavia as a progressive Utopia.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Teachers ARE taught to teach, the problem is those who want to run schools like a business, and the only way they think they can see progress is test after test after test. There is so much testing in US schools, that the only thing teachers have time for is prepping students for more testing.
I don't even want to get into how poorly teachers are cast in the media these days, people who made it possible for you to make a living (gave you an education) are treated terribly.
If not for teachers, we would all be a bunch of illiterate morons, without the ability to communicate, reason, think. You know, the things that separate us from the apes in the zoo. They deserve honor and appreciation.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I've been hearing about Finland's approach to teaching a lot recently and it honestly sounds perfect. Am I not correct in thinking that most children stay in the same school from kindergarten up until 18 as well? And I am sure they have the shortest school days too. Seems ideal.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
As usual, everyone misses the point in jumping to support their own biased view. So I'll do the same. The point of the article is "better teachers, better product" in Finland. Hey, they were the ones who brought pizza into this. Anyway, how do you get and retain better teachers? By having them unionize with no incentive to improve themselves or their methods, by paying them to stay in the job once they have a certain number of years regardless of their performance, by letting every person who wants to be a teacher into the local College of Education without any competition...no, wait,
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Catherine, I'm not sure where you're from but here in Oregon there is a lot of competition for entry into a master's program for education and the perquisites for admission are quite high (it would have been easier for me to get into law school than my graduate education program). Also, Say what you will about unions but teachers are placed in a precarious situation. we're forced to balance a private and public life all while having to expose truths that some people are vehemently against. We need the extra protection a union provides.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Andrewwolf - and how does a union protect you from those vehemently against math (or whatever subject)? And how is your balancing a public and private life any different than the rest of us worker bees? I guess if you are that concerned of running into parents and your students while shopping, you could do what a lot of teachers I know and had do--they live in a different district than they teach. Even in the rural area I grew up in they could do this if they so desired.

Cosmo - I appreciate most of the teachers I had in school and college. The ones I don't were the ones that should have retired or switched jobs, but were probably still in teaching because they had tenure. What I don't appreciate are the union officials making a lot of money to run the union and not really help the teachers or the students to learn--but forcing the teachers to pay union dues whether they wanted to or not.

If teachers and their unions could focus on how to teach kids what they need instead of polling for politicians and other non-education stuff, the US would be much better off.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
So teachers in Finland make about the same as teachers in the US and have Masters degrees, like many in the US.

Do they have to deal with NCLB, teaching to the test, and all the related bureaucratic folderol?

Are they protected by insular unions which fight tooth and nail to keep bad teachers employed?

And do they have classrooms full of kids with an inflated sense of self-importance and parents who think their special snowflakes are geniuses who can do no wrong, and/or kids who don't care at all because their families are dysfunctional and uninvolved in their kids' education and basically expect the school to do the job of parenting?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Another Tim, I think I should be allowed to live where I work. Teachers are community leaders. To answer your question about what I need protection from, I'm going to be teaching social studies. ideas in history like race, class, genocide and war are all pretty hot button issues. Like it or not what parents want for their kid and what society wants for its next generation are divergent. We need to be able to teach the truth without fear and unions help us do that. I also want to add that one of the things we're trying to teach kids is how to be responsible citizens. This includes participating in democracy and collective bargaining is part of that. I'll admit that in a better world we wouldn't need unions but getting rid of them now will just make things worse.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The headline is rather misleading. Even the article makes it clear that the Finnish "secret" isn't just better teachers. There are all kinds of unique things driving their success - including cultural dynamics which can't be reproduced here, or possibly anywhere.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Andrewwolf--Yes, you will be teaching some "hot button" topics, but I am still unclear on how the union is going to protect you. Are they going to provide bodyguards? Are they going to stake out your house to make sure noone tries to damage it? How exactly will they protect you?

And I agree, you should live where ever you want to--I was just pointing out that some of my teachers decided to live in another district. Of those that lived in town, a couple of them were my Mom's friends and a few went to the same church I did.

I also agree that kids need to be responsible citizens and be able to think and reason on their own--but you have an uphill battle as other commenters like Jeffos points out. I am not sure how useful collective bargaining is since only about 5% of the US population are union members, though.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Anothertim, I'm talking about job security not physical security. The scenario I am envisioning is more like I make a parent mad they complain I get fired because without a union my career is just in the hands of one principle. I know you want to say "well thats the way most jobs are" but teaching shouldn't be that way. Teachers serve a community not a customer base so we might be unpopular sometimes but that doesn't mean we aren't doing our job correctly.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
If you bother to google "Finnish teacher's union" you'll find that 95% of the teachers are members of the same union. This is much the same as in the rest of the Scandinavian countries.

Having a union means that the union can set standards, it can discuss directly with "management" (e.g. the government), make sure that the teachers can get the resources they need, and it is important in handling any problems which might happen. The collective bargaining part is important, but only a tiny part of what a union does.

It is only in the US and 3rd world countries that you expect teachers to buy paper and pens for the pupils from his or her income.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I am an Educational Consultant. One of my areas of expertise is School Reviews. The largest problem is that teachers can no longer focus on the 'art of teaching' in America. Education used to begin in the home. Now, parents seem to fell like learning is a spectator sport. That being said, with so many students at so many levels of performance, the average classroom teacher is focused on the 'middle'. The high functioning students are not challenged and the low performers fall through the cracks. Even though reserach shows smaller class size lends to better academic gains, we increase the class sizes and wonder why the achievement gap is widening. Even the charter school model of management consulting (get them young, straight out of school, masters in their content area, not in child development or teaching methodology, work them to death-an average of 2 years, and then recuit the next batch) gets results in the middle grades, but because we fail to teach children how to think critically, the end result is still low performance. For a field that collects more data than the IRS, we don't pay attention to the data in terms of modifying out approach to instruction. My first quesion to all teachers is: what is the impact of your teaching on learning; my second is always...'how do you know'? What is the evidence? It can be as simple as showing students how to add double digits, asking them to practice, giving a problem, giving the answer and asking for a show of hands about how many got it correct and how many can explain how they arrived at the answer. Hopefully, they can all explain how even if in different ways and support their logic. If less than 50% get it correct, you re-teach; you don't go on to the next subject because it is going to be on the standardized test!!!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I just happened to be looking for information on education reform, especially results of Finland's reforms and came upon this site. I have found it very interesting, entertaining, and informative about attitudes toward educational reform. I've been teaching since the 70's and have no plans to quit. I'm good at what I do and love it!

Some of your writers would be surprised to find that I am very conservative, as are many of my fellow teachers. I am not afraid of losing tenure, but I do believe that any worker in any job should not be able to be terminated without just cause! My husband was a principal for many years and terminated a number of teachers over the years with very little trouble because he kept very good documentation. Many administrators are much less careful or determined to do the right thing.

I am not afraid of charter schools or any other innovations they want to try. Some may work, but many won't. I still remember the disaster called "the open classroom" of the 70's. Some type of merit pay will be more difficult to institute fairly, but let the powers that be try!

None of you has mentioned that Finland pays completely for the college training of its teachers. U.S. teachers often start their careers with $100,000 in student loans, the cost of a small house. Why would anyone today want to start in the hole for a job that won't ever average more than half that amount in a year? And in the U.S. they want to take away the health benefits as well! In ten years or less there will be a dramatic shortage of teachers, but by then I'll be retired or dead.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 16 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"The Finnish Not-So-Secret Weapon for Top Notch Schools: Better Teachers"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More