NEW FEATURE: VOTE & EARN NEATOPOINTS!
Submit your own Neatorama post and vote for others' posts to earn NeatoPoints that you can redeem for T-shirts, hoodies and more over at the NeatoShop!


A Traffic Light That Decides When It Wants to Turn Green

Detailed studies of traffic flow allow cities to adjust the timing of changes on traffic signal lights. But according to a trio of researchers in Germany, Switzerland, and the United States, it may be better to simply allow individual lights to switch as local demand changes:

If each traffic light responds to its immediate demands, then all the lights will just react to the traffic coming from nearby intersections, which defeats the purpose of a smart network.

The solution is a decentralized approach that lets the traffic lights work together by figuring out how changes at each individual intersection would affect the entire system. Instead of being stymied by natural fluctuations in traffic, the system takes advantage of them, using random gaps to help improve traffic flow. Traffic lights could request green time only when there is a definite demand for them, the researchers write. This acyclic approach could eliminate the particularly annoying problem of sitting at a red light while there’s no traffic.


http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2010-09/giving-traffic-lights-mind-their-own-can-reduce-congestion-study-says | Previously: Is a Progress Bar on a Traffic Light a Good Idea? | Photo by Flickr user grendelkhan used under Creative Commons license

They may have a bit more engineering skill and study going into this, but I figured this out by driving. It seems to use a combo of "anyone there?" and the right of way method.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
This sound good and all but it flies right in the face of what some DoTs use traffic lights for: To discourage the use of said road. At least that seems to be how PennDoT uses of traffic lights. How else does one explain the rash of 6 lane roads having equal or shorter time cycles then the 2 lane cross street?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
out here the real problem is the feeble minded sheeple who wont cross the street without stopping traffic for 40 seconds by pushing the stupid pedestrian signal button.

of course the cops who hand out jaywalking tickets to people who are crossing the street in a crosswalk may be to blame.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"A Traffic Light That Decides When It Wants to Turn Green"

... Oh F###- Now we not only have grumpy passengers to deal with, but possibly also trafficlights that decide to be cross at the wrong time.... "No. No I don't wanna go green. Why should I? Done that a million times, don't like green anyhow and I happen to like red far better. So bugger off and let me be red..."
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I hate the smart traffic lights here. When we have 2 to 3 lights in a row the first light will turn red while the second it just turning green as the third is just turning red. This results in far too many stop and go's slowing down traffic and backing it up.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
How about doing it like they do in a few Dutch and English towns, which is to get rid of the traffic lights and signs altogether?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"How about doing it like they do in a few Dutch and English towns, which is to get rid of the traffic lights and signs altogether?"

I think I can speak for many of those in the US when I say 'bad idea'. We typically drive vehicles larger then bicycles. Last thing I want to do on a trip through town is to meet somebody in my mid-size sedan (read 'large' if in Europe) and them in their Suburban (read 'bus' if in Europe).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Chuck getting rid of the traffic lights and signs does not mean that the traffic code of conduct also is discarded. So unless you say that people in the US are complete retards that cannot deal with traffic unaided by lights and signs, things can still go well only using the code and common sence.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I dissagree with the concept. London has been centrally controlled since the 60's. This allows the "direction of the main part of the traffic to be timed properly, which is why you can get out of west London at 5 PM, far faster than you can get into London at that time.....
Ech traffic position is monitored and the data fed back to the central computer(s).
If a traffic light loses communication with the central computers, then it takes over its own control knowing the day of the week, the time and draws upon its "collected" knowledge of what needs to be done and how....
But it is also checking the comms and opnce communication is achieved with the central computer(s), it reverts back.....
To get traffic moving properly through a large city, the central control is needed....
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
(Response to #3) Well, gee, THAT'S easy! It takes longer to cross the six lanes than it does just two, so you give them triple the green time! What's that, there's more traffic on the six-lane? Just tell them to go the other way, then. [Hey - it's as logical as some DOTs seem to be . . .]
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 11 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"A Traffic Light That Decides When It Wants to Turn Green"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More