All successful shows eventually start to decline, but this was not "Happy Days'" time. Consider: It was the 91st episode and the fifth season. If this was really the beginning of a downward spiral, why did the show stay on the air for six more seasons and shoot an additional 164 episodes? Why did we rank among the Top 25 in five of those six seasons?
That's why, when I first heard the phrase and found out what it meant, I was incredulous. Then my incredulity turned into amazement. I started thinking about the thousands of television shows that had been on the air since the medium began. And out of all of those, the "Happy Days" episode in which Fonzie jumps over a shark is the one to be singled out? This made no sense.
Link via blastr | Image: Paramount
Happy Days certainly coasted on it's success for those last six years, and lots of people watched out of habit or boredom. Doesn't mean it was any good, just a cash cow when an old sit-com could run for a long, long time.
Lay off.
The show ate itself
No, what makes no sense is to have the Fonz jumping over a freaking shark while wearing his leather jacket! Fonzie was cool and would easily know how much of a dork he looked like skiing with a leather jacket on.
If he takes exception to the Happy Days link, perhaps he could refer to the Marcel the Monkey arrives episode of Friends. Same problem.
However he seems to miss the point. He witters on about popularity and longevity as if either were some sort of measure of quality. Yeah that's right all popular shows are quality TV. All popular shows are good. Actually popularity seems to be a really good way of identifying a poor TV show.