Milk: Does It Do Your Body Good?

Got milk? On the surface of it, there's nothing healtier than a glass of milk - no preservatives, no artificial colors, no high-fructose corn syrup - just good ol' nutritious milk ... Or is it?

... almost 8,000 years after nomadic herders realized they could tug at the udders of slow-moving livestock, we still aren't sure how much of the stuff we should be drinking. The USDA recommends three cups of dairy a day for all adults, but the science behind milk hasn't been settled. "This is one of the most complicated and interesting areas of nutrition," says Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health, "and we don't have all of the answers."

Many high-profile nutritionists — often working with large research grants from the dairy industry — say that milk in great quantities is an essential part of the daily diet that can help prevent osteoporosis, heart disease, cancer and other illnesses. "Anything less than three glasses a day, and you won't get all of the nutrients that you need," says Connie Weaver, head of food and nutrition at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. Most of Weaver's funding comes from the National Institutes of Health, but she's also supported by the National Dairy Council.

On the other side, groups promoting animal rights and veganism — including PETA and the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine — say that cow's milk is a nutritional nightmare that doesn't belong in the human diet. "It's gross," says Dr. Neil Barnard, author and founder of the PCRM. "Milk is nutritionally perfect for one purpose: feeding a calf," he says. "The idea that we should be drinking milk from a cow is just bizarre."

Willett, one of the world's most prominent nutrition experts, doesn't belong to either camp. From his viewpoint, one or two cups of milk each day is a safe, reasonable and nutritious goal. "But beyond that," he says, "the benefits are unclear, and there may be some risk."

Chris Woolston did a special report for the Los Angeles Times: Link


"It’s gross," says Dr. Neil Barnard, author and founder of the PCRM. "Milk is nutritionally perfect for one purpose: feeding a calf," he says. "The idea that we should be drinking milk from a cow is just bizarre."

That quote reminds me of the joke/analogy about the gay man sitting next to a Catholic priest in a aeroplane.

The Catholic Priest argues with the gay man about his sexuality, by saying "It's unnatural, it's not what God intended"

The gay man replies back, "We are in flying metal tube!"
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
This sounds like another manufactured debate to me. All the anti-milk groups discussed have deeply entrenched interests in removing all animal products from our diet (PCRM is a vegan advocacy group) and only seem to be able to produce sporadic studies supporting their positions. Reminds me of the vaccination "debate", which isn't really a debate so much a small vocal group of people determined to find something wrong with vaccines (and often ending up proving the value of vaccines by living in clumps together allowing outbreaks of diseases that aren't seen anywhere else).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"Milk is nutritionally perfect for one purpose: feeding a calf," he says.
And soybeans (used to make soy milk) are nutritionally perfect for one purpose: nourishing seedlings...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Dr Neil Barnard is ridiculous to assume that people aren't meant to use milk from a domesticated animal. Middle Eastern and Indian civilisations have survived famines through sustaining themselves from milk and through trading their prized milk cattle for other vitals. The dairy industry has helped many European communities to haul themselves out of poverty after World War 2.

Cheese has become such a part of many Western European societies that it would be unthinkable to remove such a vital ingredient from their cuisine. PETA's simplistic argument is leaving out the obvious historical importance milk has in civilisation past and present!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Humans are unique in that most of us produce lactase in our digestive system into adulthood, the enzyme that allows us to digest the lactose that is contained in milk. Almost every other species of mammal is lactose intolerant in adulthood, losing their ability to properly digest milk once they are weened.

The ability to produce this enzyme into adulthood would have been an advantage over those who were unable to produce it a.k.a. lactose intolerance, as it allowed people to gain valuable nutrients and energy from animal milk.

Those of us who can digest milk are able to do so today because we inherited the ability to produce this enzyme from our ancestors, who had an evolutionary advantage over those who couldn't.

So what better counter argument against the whole "we aren't supposed to drink milk" argument than the fact that we evolved the ability to drink milk over thousands of years? The only people who shouldn't be drinking milk are lactose intolerant people.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm lactose intolerant and I can tell you, it is one of the most annoying things out. Dairy is EVERYWHERE.

I do agree that drinking milk past childhood is odd though. Many Asians and Native Americans are lactose intolerant because they don't drink milk once they have been weaned, and Asians seem to consistently top the list of people who live the longest. They must be doing something right!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It is weird to drink milk from an animal, but have you paid attention to nature lately? That's really the least unusual kind of symbiosis I can think of.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Also, different kinds of milk have different ingredients. For instance: goat's milk has a lot of vitamin C as well as a lack of casein protein; hence, goat's milk is easier for humans to digest and is valuable where other sources of vitamin C are scarce. Cow's milk is the opposite and despite certain breeds of humans having no trouble with lactose in adulthood it still takes a longer time for a human to digest casein protein; however, that's not really a problem for a ruminant stomach.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"Anything less than three glasses a day, and you won’t get all of the nutrients that you need..."

GOOD LORD! How can we save the 60% OF HUMANS ADULTS who CAN'T DIGEST MILK?!?!?!

"If you're American or European it's hard to realize this, but being able to digest milk as an adult is one weird genetic adaptation.

It's not normal. Somewhat less than 40% of people in the world retain the ability to digest lactose after childhood. The numbers are often given as close to 0% of Native Americans, 5% of Asians, 25% of African and Caribbean peoples, 50% of Mediterranean peoples and 90% of northern Europeans."

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2009-08-30-lactose-intolerance_N.htm
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ Cola
Symbiosis? I can't see how the cow benefits.

I still likes my dairy though. I'm getting my wisdom teeth out tomorrow so it looks like I'll be having a lot of dairy in the next few days - smoothies, yogurt, ice cream etc...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
i'm not anti-milk (or meat or anything of the sort), although i do believe that once humans hit adulthood, dairy has very little nutritional value. there are several studies that show adults absorb very little of the vitamins in dairy, and that something like 80% of the world's adult population is lactose-intolerant to some degree (i fall into that category, especially with milk and ice cream, although i'm fine with most cheeses and yogurt.)

i drink lactose-free milk pretty regularly because it tastes good, and i still loves me some chocolate milk. but soy milk doesn't sit well in my stomach and cooking with it usually makes the food taste "off". if i were to drink 3 full glasses of regular milk a day, though, i'd be in a perpetual state of stomach cramps and explosive diarrhea, so something tells me it's not particularly beneficial to my health. almond and rice milk both taste good, but they don't taste like real milk and are pretty limited when it comes to cooking with them.

i don't think drinking milk is any more "bizarre" than mashing grains, fermenting them and then turning them into beer, vodka or bourbon. or soaking a paper baggie with dried plant leaves in hot water to make tea. or how about injecting water with CO2, pumping it full of sugar and carmel coloring and drinking it out of an aluminum can? that seems far stranger to me than drinking milk! by the good Doctor's assertation, it seems like he thinks we should all be drinking water and nothing else (although i have a strong suspicion he drinks beverages other than water.) hell, some culture regularly drink the blood of the animals they slaughter for food! he needs to be reminded that one culture's "bizarre" is another culture's "perfectly normal" and to stop pushing his own personal beliefs as science.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Nikki, japanese (especially in the coastal regions) live longer because their diet is based on fresh fish and cereal grains. There are some small villages even here in Italy where the presence of centenarians is relevant. Guess what their diet is like?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
People get so damn worked up about dairy... Geez. It's not "natural" to drink milk past adulthood, bla bla. Ever thought of the geographical aspect – WHY certain cultures drink milk? That maybe having to survive winters in very harsh climates played a role? Scandinavia comes to mind. Where they probably fared a lot better by adding fresh milk to their sad winter diet of salted herring and potatoes... Not even freshly caught fish, because the lakes/ocean freeze over.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Search ScienceDaily for "milk" sometime.

Longer Life For Milk Drinkers, Study Suggests

Drinking Milk During Pregnancy May Lower Baby's Risk of Multiple Sclerosis

Children Who Often Drink Full-Fat Milk Weigh Less, Swedish Research Finds

Milk: Two Glasses a Day Tones Muscles, Keeps the Fat Away in Women, Study Shows

(And also: Lactose Intolerance Rates May Be Significantly Lower Than Previously Believed)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It's obvious that milk has been an important source of nutrients in human history, and I don't think the anti-milk folks are denying that. What they are arguing is that milk isn't the perfect, essential, health-building foodstuff it's made out to be in our culture today, and may in fact be damaging to health. While it is silly to dismiss milk as "unnatural" (while accepting things like bread or coffee or what-have-you), it's also silly to insist that humans *need* to drink cow's milk to be healthy.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 21 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Milk: Does It Do Your Body Good?"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More