The London 2012 Olympic Mascots

Here are Wenlock and Mandeville, the mascots for the 2012 Olympics in London, England. Wenlock will represent the Olympic games and Mandeville will represent the Paralympic games. Their names are a piece of history.
Wenlock is named after the Shropshire town of Much Wenlock where, in the mid-19th century, the Wenlock Games became one of the inspirations for the modern Olympic movement.

Mandeville's name is derived from Stoke Mandeville, in Buckinghamshire, home to Stoke Mandeville Hospital.

In the 1940s Dr Ludwig Guttman came to the hospital to set up a new spinal unit to help former soldiers suffering from spinal cord injuries.

Looking for ways to inspire those in his care he encouraged them to take up sport and the Stoke Mandeville Games was formed, widely recognised as a forerunner of the modern Paralympic movement.

The characters' appearances are loaded with symbolism, explained at The Daily Mail. Link to story. http://www.ourlondon2012.com/mascots/ to website.-via Holy Kaw!

If these are for real, then Pixar will should do some advertising during the games for the Monsters, Inc. sequel. Those dudes look a lot like Mike.

http://www.impawards.com/2001/monsters_inc_ver2.html
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Why they're claiming the eyes are 'camera lenses' i don't know, they look nothing like a camera's lens at all. They simply look like a big single eye. I don't know what to make of the London taxi symbolism either, my first instinct when I saw them is that the one on the left had a pyramid on its head with an all seeing eye. I don't know what that's about.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
They make me do a double take every time I see them, as if there's something I'm missing...

@Finagle- You make it sound like the UK has a government department of surveillance.

But in all seriousness, if you pay for some professional firm to create some cartoon characters, they'll come up with some stupid crap, ESPECIALLY if you pay them to do it. They should have just asked some primary school to come up with designs. Would have saved money and would actually be nice to look at.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
This looks like somebody was trying way too hard.

Of course Olympic mascots have a tradition of being strange, unpopular, and generating a lot of unsold merchandise...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@MadMolecule- But there is no department of surveillance. I should know, I live there. Quoting Wikipedia for something of this magnitude has no substance whatsoever and even they don't say anything about such a department.

Maybe just stick to the posted article and stop having a go at other countries (I'm assuming you don't live in the UK). I haven't said anything about the country you live in, as I don't pretend to know anything about how it works. Maybe you (and everyone else commenting about "state surveillance") are compensating for something about your own situation by belittling my country?

How's the patriot act going?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
They aren't...bad, I guess.
To me, they lack a LOT of creativity. I've lost track of the number of one-eyed monster creations I've seen in the past 15 years. It seems like whenever there's a small company doing "Artist" action figures/toys there's a one-eyed monster in the mix somewhere.
Is originality dead? Has the internet caused artists to work off each other to the point of nauseating predictability?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I am absolutely loving the tragicomedy going on here...first, the tacky 80's looking 'broken swastika/Maggie Simspon giving a blowjob/some drunk puking utter monstrosity that is the logo...and now these sex toy/alien invader fantastically creepy looking utter rejects! My, but hasn't the design team hit every possible bad note and wrong move possible in these walking dildoes? Once you see the Maggie thing in the logo, you simply cannot unsee it. Hee!

Given this level of truly the most appalling, butt ugly and simply hideous beyond compare effort involved here, I'm almost tempted to watch the opening ceremonies. Because they're sure to be utterly tacky, disgusting, and worth at least one good party.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
These mascots are terrible! What is the London Olympic committee smoking?! After all the criticism of the Vancouver 2010 Olympics, we expected London to actually have some impressive mascots; however, it is pretty obvious they were just bashing Vancouver in hope that it would make their own pathetic attempt at hosting the games look good, BUT they failed miserably!!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 29 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"The London 2012 Olympic Mascots"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More