Priest Advises Poor to Shoplift

Father Tim Jones of the St. Lawrence Church in York, England is getting some flack for advice he preached after his Nativity sermon on Sunday, in which he advocated shoplifting for those in desperate straits.
Delivering his festive lesson, Father Jones told the congregation: 'My advice, as a Christian priest, is to shoplift. I do not offer such advice because I think that stealing is a good thing, or because I think it is harmless, for it is neither.

'I would ask that they do not steal from small family businesses, but from large national businesses, knowing that the costs are ultimately passed on to the rest of us in the form of higher prices.

'I would ask them not to take any more than they need, for any longer than they need.

'I offer the advice with a heavy heart and wish society would recognise that bureaucratic ineptitude and systematic delay has created an invitation and incentive to crime for people struggling to cope.'

He added that he felt society had failed the needy, and said it was far better they shoplift than turn to more degrading or violent options such as prostitution, mugging or burglary.

Both the North Yorkshire police department and local MP Anne McIntosh hav publicly denounced Father Jones' sermon. Link -via Fark

What happens when someone gets busted, and then tells the court "God told me to do it?"

What does the court do? Either the court has to say "sorry, god doesn't exist", or it has to accept it, or it has to say "not guilty by reason of mental illness"...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Shannon

Religion isn't the reason; it's almost just always the excuse. If the person is mentally ill they may be pardoned, but if it happens again they will face the consequences. Doesn't matter what you believe, if you break the law, no god can help you.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
So, if you shoplift from a big chain store, it's OK because it only affects the employees of that big chain store and their families, not the employees and families of a small business... oh wait. People are people, stealing is stealing.

Stupid, illegal, and immoral. How about instead of advising poor congregants to break the law, you remind them that people are more important than things? Or advise well-to-do members to look around for ways to help? Just because one views "society" as having "failed" doesn't mean you go ahead and return evil for evil by stealing!

Here's an idea, if the Pope is really so compassionate, maybe he could, i don't know, sell off some of those jewel-encrusted hats he likes to wear and feed some hungry people. Vow of poverty my rear.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Katthe7th

They no longer have any credibility anyways. They protect pedophile priests, have a vast amount of non-taxed income, and spread misinformation about AIDS telling families in Africa that condoms can cause it to fuel their "pro-life" cause. They are one of the worst corporations on the planet.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Let's not get the tired old Dawkins vs. Religion dungball rolling again. Let's stick to the issue. The church has been consistently devoted to the poor and needy from its foundation and a lot of heart-warming humanitarian work has been done in Christ's name - the Church has also behaved with remarkable avarice and callousness and ignored those in need throughout the ages. But that's beside the point. This is about one priest and his "radical" idea (although an idea that has been expounded within the Church numerous times before)

I like this priest. He's preaching illegalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegalism). Predictable knee-jerk reaction from the public: "Yo. Break the law do the time, bro". But it's easier to dismiss him than to take it in.

It never hurts to revisit one's opinions:
a) What might the priest be accomplishing by opening up this dialogue?
b) What are you accomplishing by laughing it off?
c) Whom does it benefit when you dismiss what he suggests?
d) Do you think this is a simple publicity stunt or is the priest genuinely committed to the welfare of the poor. Could it be both?
e) What are you doing for the poor this Christmas? Is it a token gesture around the holidays? Or are you helping us find long-term/large-scale solutions?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
hot issue, of course... I don't think telling anyone to steal is going to really be the answer. Stealing is not going to fill your belly long-term, either...and it won't help your self-esteem.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"He added that he felt society had failed the needy,"
Yeeaaah.... A society that is largely christian. Nothing has changed. Good old Robin hood mentality, steel from the rich it's okay as long as your poor and you give 10% back to the church.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Comments here look like a FreeRepublic message board. Thank you, MadMolecule, for putting a little perspective in this. I seriously doubt the priest was talking about stealing things like flat-screen TVs & the like. I'm sure he meant food, clothing, etc. which sounds reasonable to me. Especially given violent/self-destructive crimes as a possible alternative. The priest is right: society has screwed the poor.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@people

"Let's not get the tired old Dawkins vs. Religion dungball rolling again. Let's stick to the issue."

Why not? The fundamentalists make snide comments whenever Evolution is brought up, it's only fair that the other side gets a few shots in right? Welcome to neatorama, we're one big happy dysfunctional family.

@Alex

O I C WUT U DID THAR!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
So a socialist country (in this case, England) can't afford to help the poor? And how will the US fare once it becomes socialist?

It stretches belief to the breaking point to call this guy a Christian. Apparently he does not read the commandments ("Thou shall not steal") nor how people, even through the church, are to help each other.

Why not do what my church is doing? Typically, we have a free will offering that goes to those who are needy--we used to collect this monthly, now we are collecting it twice a month. Allows those who have money to help out those who need money/food/shelter.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I can't believe he would actually advise people to steal. Shoplifting is stealing regardless of the size of the business or who owns it. It's coming out of someone's pocket somewhere down the line regardless. Plus, stealing is absolutely against the Christian religion, I can't imagine a church leader teaching his flock to sin. There's no rules in the Bible about "Thou shalt not steal except shoplifting from big stores when you're having financial hard-times".

I would think that if he had enough financially needy people in his congregation that he needed to address the situation in his sermon, he would have been better off to address the issue by working to connect his congregation with social services and charities that could aid them.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Max Power,

Could you please show the class where "York, England" is in America? You will then be required to stay after class and write an essay on the importance of reading comprehension.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Melissa (and the entire darn universe)

Charities and social services aren't working, that's his point. They serve to whitewash the issue, cleanse the middle-class guilt over how they molest the poor on a daily basis. The situation the way it is now is not acceptable. So we need radical solutions for radical problems - maybe not stealing, but at least he's giving the dialogue some urgency.

Ok, it's wrong to steal. What would you call the hundreds of billions that have been stolen from the American people over the last few decades, whether from corrupt businesses or their collaborators in government. Those men did not have an urgent need to steal, and yet they did and, in most cases, got away with it.
It seems the U.S. government has given its blessing to these business practices - why should the starving be exempt from the right to profit from the work of others?

And if you want to get more "philosophical" about it, aren't all English people thieves already? They have museums full of stolen artifacts reminding of us of that history. The rampant consumption on display over the holiday is another good reminder of how we, at this very moment, are exploiting developing nations, wasting resources and generally manipulating and destroying things that "are not ours to take".

You say stealing is stealing regardless of size. If a a industrial country pollutes the waterways of a developing country on the other side of the globe, robbing people of their livelihood, is that any different? When a government forces you to bail out thieves is that any different? Have you ever downloaded a song illegally, Melissa? So on and so on.

I'm not asking you to agree with what the priest is saying, but at least allow for the fact that stealing takes many forms and right now small-scale shoplifting for sustenance is hardly the most pressing kind.

This is an issue that requires you to address the idea of property, capital, right-of-ownership, and several other key ideas. It simply isn't as cut-and-dried as it's made out to be.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
And I realize that the priest is talking from an English standpoint and I have no idea if you're American or not. I was simply taking the U.S. as an easy example.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Jay

"Do not have any other gods before me."

How about that one? That is unless intolerance of other religions is actual virtue.

"Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy."

Would I be anti capitalist if I think that store owners that have their shop open on Sunday should be put to death? Hmm. Your right, definatly too liberal.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
You have to remember he said only take what you need. If you can survive off a loaf of bread, then you would take just that. I doubt you would get any more than a slap on the wrist, and you're not starving. What we should be criticizing is not those poor who are pressured to steal, but US, for not even thinking to provide for people who are starving. Obviously people could use his sermon with selective hearing to justify evil, but people do that with the bible every single day.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
hey if my family is starving I wont hesitate for a second to steal what I need to survive , I'm not talking ipod's and shoe's .

you people , after getting screwed over by big corporation are still backing them over the needy ?

this is a sad sad world we live in when money comes before life ...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
He would be much better off organizing and mobilizing his congregation to do something to help the poor, like offering a weekly meal for those in need. Food bought in large quantities is much cheaper than the small packages that the poor would likely try to steal. They could feed a whole bunch of hungry for $1-2 a meal if they put out a little effort.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
To shoplift means one is putting one's faith in the world's system and not on God's. Much better options include
-advocating for fair wages and more jobs
-turning away from affluenza and downsizing. Two great books on the topic are The "Tightwad Gazette" and "Your Money or Your Life". Using myself as an illustration, I moved from my own apartment in a so-so neighborhood to shared housing in a better area and cut my expenses 50%. I am having to learn how to share and get along with others though.
-increasing one's faith, which in turn will alert one to unusual opportunities, supernatural favor and freedom from a poverty mindset. God owes you a living if you follow his/her instructions- not any particular organization. Check out psalm 37:25; S(he) does not forsake the righteous or make them beg for bread. Chronic and long term use of welfare, foodlines and stealing suggest being out of touch with your rights as a follower of God.

Happy Kwanzaa and Christmas to all
Helen McKnight
Toronto, Canada
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ "society had failed the needy"

Excuse me? Aren't most poor people poor because they make poor choices? Why is this my problem now? I don't want to spend higher prices at my grocery store because some self-righteous Jeebusfreak is stealing from the frozen food section. I get enough of that with the standard shoplifting crowd as it is.

I give to one charity and one only: mandatory taxes. If my government does not think you deserve to be on their aid programs, then there is probably a reason for it.

I've been on government aid myself when I was between jobs; I can vouch for it being sufficient for people who live responsibly.

Religion is such utter shit anyway. I hope this gathers a lot of negativity.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ Zaulankris:

"Aren't most poor people poor because they make poor choices?"

No. I know it's hard, but it's important to understand that we live within a complex network of forces and are not, each of us, born at the same exact level with the same exact potentials and options. Have a gander at, I don't know, India, and ask yourself if the millions of destitute people there each simply made some bad decisions in an otherwise completely open and potential-rich environment. I'm not even sure why I'm saying this; it's so stunningly obvious. Unless you're trolling, in which case, well done.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
When I was completely out of money and trying to go to college at the time, I stole food from the supermarket a couple of times.

I don't the solution is to steal food, but I don't think anyone who has food to eat on a daily basis should take the moral high ground. There are people in real desperate situations, and sometimes you have to take drastic measures.

When he said: "I offer the advice with a heavy heart and wish society would recognise that bureaucratic ineptitude and systematic delay has created an invitation and incentive to crime for people struggling to cope."

This is not clear enough. He should of quoted quoted Ghandi, who said, "We have enough for everyone's needs, but we don't have enough for everyone's greed." It's pitiful that billions upon billions of dollars are wasted on war, entertainment, and greed while adults and children go hungry and homeless. There's no justification for it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 35 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Priest Advises Poor to Shoplift"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More