Interactive Electronic Tattoo



It's not such much a literal tattoo as an electronic interface implanted beneath the skin:

The basis of the 2x4-inch "Digital Tattoo Interface" is a Bluetooth device made of thin, flexible silicon and silicone. It´s inserted through a small incision as a tightly rolled tube, and then it unfurls beneath the skin to align between skin and muscle. Through the same incision, two small tubes on the device are attached to an artery and a vein to allow the blood to flow to a coin-sized blood fuel cell that converts glucose and oxygen to electricity. After blood flows in from the artery to the fuel cell, it flows out again through the vein.

On both the top and bottom surfaces of the display is a matching matrix of field-producing pixels. The top surface also enables touch-screen control through the skin. Instead of ink, the display uses tiny microscopic spheres, somewhat similar to tattoo ink. A field-sensitive material in the spheres changes their color from clear to black, aligned with the matrix fields.

The tattoo display communicates wirelessly to other Bluetooth devices - both in the outside world and within the same body. Although the device is always on (as long as your blood´s flowing), the display can be turned off and on by pushing a small dot on the skin. When the phone rings, for example, an individual turns the display on, and "the tattoo comes to life as a digital video of the caller," Mielke explains. When the call ends, the tattoo disappears.


Link via Say Uncle

Come now. When posting things like this you really must point to the fact that it's a concept, not a functioning model. Unless, of course, you are trying to stir people into a frothing frenzy. Me, even if they come out with such an implant, I will never put an electronic communications device inside of me, for several reasons.

I can almost guarantee that this would have long-term negative impacts on the sympathetic and central nervous system. And, it would be a huge "here I am" stamp" for whoever wanted to find me. Call me crazy, but no thank you.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
From the article: "Could such an invasive device have harmful biological effects? Actually, the device could offer health benefits. That´s because it also continually monitors for many blood disorders, alerting the person of a health problem."

Sounds pretty sweet, although the process of "unfurling" between the skin and muscle sounds very painful. Also I'm pretty paranoid about anything that could be used as Big Brother, and like Briannana said, it could be used to track you down or listen in on your conversations.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"When posting things like this you really must point to the fact that it’s a concept, not a functioning model." I strongly agree. What's up Neatorama?

Clotting and infection are a major risk with this, as they are with all current artificial veins and subcutaneous accesses.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Not a pipedream, but also not 'here' right now.

This would be cool, and I think it's just a display (no interactivity beyond on/off), so I don't think you'd dial keypads on your arm.

I would think it'd be much like a monochrome LCD, so it could be set to display caller ID, other text, the time, and depending on the resolution, animated characters or even mobil-phone quality video.

I wonder, though... if the device operates off of gluecose and such in the blood, would it be safe for diebetics? Would it have a significant impact on your caloric health? Would it have a waste product?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Does it come with Caller ID? Can you register your arm on the Do Not Call List? Can you put your arm on Speaker Phone? I have so many questions......
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Think of the possibilities! If it's powered by blood flow you could easily code the phone to call emergency services if the users heart rate went above or below certain thresholds. No need to call someone if you're having a heart attack, you're taken care of.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
My first thought is: what can this do that a wafer thin screen strapped outside the skin can't? And the answer is not a lot really. The fact that it is powered by blood is neat, but there are probably better ways. Also it has the disadvantage of requiring minor surgery every time you want to upgrade.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 19 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Interactive Electronic Tattoo"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More